Questions to ask linguistic evolutionists -
12-11-2007, 08:56 PM
Just as biological evolutionists preach a dogma that contradicts the first two chapters of Genesis, linguistic evolutionists advocate a belief system that contradicts the 11th chapter of Genesis, which plainly states that the Lord "did there confound the language of all the earth" to enforce His holy zoning laws. If a linguistic evolutionist tries to convert you to his demonic doctrine, here are some hard questions for you to ask:
How do you know that languages evolved? Were you there? Why don't you trust the account given to us by God, Who tells that He was there?
How could language have evolved from random babbling? If a tornado going through a junkyard couldn't produce a Boeing 747, how could random babbling result in something so complicated as the Spanish verb paradigm?
How could random mutations in language introduce information, which is what language is all about? Whenever I see a typo in a document, it doesn't add information, but takes it away.
If the language spoken by English settlers in what is today Brooklyn evolved into Brooklynese, why are there still other dialects of English? Shouldn't the entire English-speaking world now sound like Vinny Barbarino?
Which evolved first, the ability to speak French or the ability to understand spoken French?
If languages evolved, why don't we see one language kind suddenly becoming another language kind? Why don't Portuguese speakers suddenly start speaking Farsi? For that matter, why don't we hear people speaking a transitional form?
How could a language evolve in stages from less complicated to more complicated? Of what use is half of a future tense?
The Nazis, the Communists, and American racists have all tried to force people to give up their "less evolved" languages in favor of "more evolved" German, Russian, and English. Doesn't that prove that linguistic evolutionism is at the root of Nazism, Communism, and racism?
How do you experimentally verify the supposed evolution of French from Latin? What would you use as the control? If you can't, is linguistic evolutionism scientific at all?
The "evidence" for linguistic evolutionism consists of a bunch of supposedly old documents that are dated either by reference to one another or by the dates that those documents themselves purport. Isn't that circular logic?
If languages improve through evolution, why don't teenagers automatically speak better English than their parents?
This church is dedicated to preaching True Christianity™ and the King James Bible exactly as they are, with no alterations to make them more politically correct for modern liberals. If you think that we've misquoted or twisted Scripture or quoted any verse out of context, please explain in detail how we've done so. Otherwise, if what you read on this site offends you, then you're offended by Almighty God and His Word, not by us.
Questions to ask liberal "Christians" ✞ Things that the Bible doesn't say ✞ Tolerance
|