Quote:
Originally Posted by Sacha-DG
Typical of a creationist to insist on mireading my post. I stated that light is composed of photons, particles of zero resting mass. I also made the point that gravity is the attraction between two masses. Explain how an object of mass, such as the Earth, attracts particles of no mass via gravity.
Oh, wait. It doesn't.
|
How can you say it doesn’t? God decrees what gravity is. Christian sciences has long ago proven that gravity is just angels holding things down. Basically the angels fly up and grab the light photons and drag them down a little bit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sacha-DG
As for seeing the stars during a solar eclipse (When making a point about an eclipse, be sure to point out which kind, for argument's sake.), this is the same effect as seeing the stars at night. The Sun's light outshines that of the stars during the day, explaining why we cannot see them at daytime. During an eclipse, the Sun's light is blocked by the moon. As such, this allows us to view the light from the stars previously hidden by the light from the Sun.
|
No, what happened was a star near the edge of the sun observed “position” was moved by the gravitational effect of the sun. This could only be seen during an eclipse because the sun is so bright.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sacha-DG
A racial cheap shot? You know what light and dark means, right?
|
It also means ignorant. You are saying Australians are backwards. There is no room for hate at Landover.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sacha-DG
I was not always an atheist, I have considered the points from evolution and science and those from Christianity from a neutral perspective. I find that every creationist argument can be disproven, and at the end of the day, you have but your book, whereas science has fact, logic and reason.
|
So, another ex-Christian atheist? I am so sad you chose reason over damnation. I do hope you are not here just to use Landover to mock Christians by making us sound like a bunch of raving idiots.