[Cranky Old Man]

Originally Posted by Tachi123

the part where I could not see the logic is the point where you connect one woman to all women

True, I should have said most woman. I failed to mention there are exceptions.

I'm happy we can agree on that point. Though I do not understand why her parents would be to blame?

A 6 year old girl should never be in a situation where she could be raped. Her parents should have prevented that. She should never be alone without protection from her family. This is one of the reasons True Christians home school their kids instead of sending them to schools where they can be raped by the teachers there.

If a woman wears... let's say a miniskirt, would that be an act of seduction?

Yes. What other reason could she have for wearing a mini skirt but to seduce man? And no one forced her to do it. She choose to do it.

Is a man justified in forcing himself upon a girl (or the other way around, for that sake) because he finds that she was 'seducing' him?

No. As I already mentioned the man should not have sex with her unless they are married. But it would not be rape because she seduced him.

I would say it all depends on whether the woman says no, or if she willingly indulges in the sex. This makes it a very touchy and difficult subject, since it will almost always be word against word.

The problem is indeed that it is word against word and unfortunately in most cases a women is believed if she claims rape, even though in many cases the women is to blame.