Why would His Unholiness have wanted to drug little children? Oh, never mind; I think I've figured it out.
Anyway, another sin of the Roman institution is its infatuation with the liberal notion of "social justice." The papists have twisted and cherry-picked Scripture to make Jesus sound like some sort of liberal do-gooder. Anyone who has actually read the Bible knows that Jesus preferred a
Robb Report lifestyle for himself to charity for the poor:
John 12:1-8: Then Jesus six days before the passover came to Bethany, where Lazarus was which had been dead, whom he raised from the dead. There they made him a supper; and Martha served: but Lazarus was one of them that sat at the table with him. Then took Mary a pound of ointment of spikenard, very costly, and anointed the feet of Jesus, and wiped his feet with her hair: and the house was filled with the odour of the ointment. Then saith one of his disciples, Judas Iscariot, Simon's [son], which should betray him, Why was not this ointment sold for three hundred pence, and given to the poor? This he said, not that he cared for the poor; but because he was a thief, and had the bag, and bare what was put therein. Then said Jesus, Let her alone: against the day of my burying hath she kept this. For the poor always ye have with you; but me ye have not always.
I guess we're not supposed to notice that the only one preaching the "social gospel" was Judas, who proved himself to be an early version of a liberal welfare pimp.