Quote:
Originally Posted by GuessImHellbound
As stated by the previous member, different species evolve differently.
|
So evolution only works for some species? Evolution is changes brought about by competition. If the prey, fish went to the land to get away from sharks, sharks would have followed them on to land in due course. If evolution was true we should be afraid because sharks camouflaged as lawyers would attack us every time we left our houses.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GuessImHellbound
I also was going to ask where is this evidence, and how would that prove anything in relation to Earth?
|
Typical Darwinist reply; when dealt with a set back attack the questioner with trivialities like a lack of facts. Fact is never an issue with THE TRUTH™
I will put that as “unable to answer” .
Quote:
Originally Posted by GuessImHellbound
Not just luck. People continue to survive because of medical research and improvements, which save countless lives that would otherwise die off.
|
These people are unsuccessful and stupid. This means they are to incompetent to take advantage of medical research or have no access to it. By the laws of your evolution they should die off, not sneak across our borders looking for jobs. I am amazed you liberals aren’t gunning them down because they undermine the central tenant of your faith. Shows you who is the better because we REAL American Conservatives give them jobs.
That’s call compassion. You should try it sometimes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GuessImHellbound
The person before me continuously seems to have said what I wanted to say anyways, but as he or she or it said, evolution does work by what someone wants, and mutations are unpredictable.
|
Oh, so having a third arm would not be an advantage?? If someone had a third arm they would be able two work a third faster and get better jobs. Since you Darwinists claim Panda’s lost and re-grew their thumbs and third arm should be child’s play.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GuessImHellbound
Again I agree with the previous poster. Cremation was the first idea that came to my mind, then I also would have said decomposition. The previous poster had another explanation, which I had forgotten, but is correct; scavengers.
|
Even if they ate them all assuming an average of 100lbs per person that would be 75 billion tons of human remains in worm guts.
Face, your answers are weak. Worse they hypothetical because you lack direct observation. That is were we Creationists trump you, we have the ultimate direct observer; God. Now turn your lives over to Jesus.