View Single Post
(#5)
Old
Meek and Humble's Avatar
Meek and Humble Meek and Humble is offline
Biblical Poet, Warrior and Scholar
Biblical Black Belt
Jr. Pastor
True Christian™

True Christian™ Saved 1 Year One Year/1000 posts True Heterosexual™ 1st Year Bible College 2nd Year Bible College 3rd Year Bible College 4th Year Bible College Gold Tither Ex-Mary Worshipper Christian Love The Al E. Pistle Award for Excellence in Rebuking Tagging for Jesus TC Bravery Heaven Bound Protected by JESUS Ex-Masturbator Ready for the Rapture True Christian Caucasian Real American™ Friend of Jesus Flat Earth Persecuted Mission to Las Vegas Porn Resistant Pro-Life The Lord’s Witness Wound Teabag Patriot Prayer Warrior

 
Posts: 6,232
Join Date: Dec 2008
Meek and Humble will sit at the right hand of Jesus Himself come the Glory!Meek and Humble will sit at the right hand of Jesus Himself come the Glory!Meek and Humble will sit at the right hand of Jesus Himself come the Glory!Meek and Humble will sit at the right hand of Jesus Himself come the Glory!Meek and Humble will sit at the right hand of Jesus Himself come the Glory!Meek and Humble will sit at the right hand of Jesus Himself come the Glory!Meek and Humble will sit at the right hand of Jesus Himself come the Glory!Meek and Humble will sit at the right hand of Jesus Himself come the Glory!Meek and Humble will sit at the right hand of Jesus Himself come the Glory!Meek and Humble will sit at the right hand of Jesus Himself come the Glory!Meek and Humble will sit at the right hand of Jesus Himself come the Glory!
Default Re: "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone" - not Biblic - 02-22-2010, 10:27 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Godfly View Post
I don't care what may or may not have been in the original. The story is in the ONE TRUE BIBLE 1611 KVJ! Unsaved trash may read whatever bible they like, but if they're lookin for a map to Heaven, It's 1611 KVJ or they may as well read a romance novel for all the good it does them.
Boy, did you just imply that I am unsaved trash?! Even King James made mistakes. After all, his Bible also contained the Apocrypha, but we all know THAT isn't really part of the Bible either.

For more info, follow the link I provided.


http://www.conservapedia.com/Talk:Jo...8Translated%29

"Thanks for your superb analysis, Michael, from which I learned immensely.

For the record, the ideological objection is not to how liberals "twist" this passage, but how the passage itself is written in such a liberal way that it renders its authenticity doubtful. It would be akin to discovering a passage that said something like this: "Jesus then said that government should take from the rich and give to the poor." Historical analysis can prove that to be non-authentic; political analysis can reach the same conclusion more efficiently and with a high degree of certitude.

Jesus did not forgive without repentance, yet the Adulteress Story claims He did. Jesus did not comment on capital punishment, yet the Adulteress Story claims He did. Jesus was not permissive about adultery, yet the Adulteress Story He was. Older people are not always wiser than younger ones, yet the Adulteress Story claims they are. And so on."
Reply With Quote