Creation Science The origins of life and the earth from a creationist (Biblical) perspective. |
|
Biblical Poet, Warrior and Scholar Biblical Black Belt Jr. Pastor
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 6,232
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
|
Another ridiculous evolutionist "argument" REFUDIATED -
12-02-2010, 03:08 AM
Some evolutionists are saying the fact that the red squirrel is dying out and being replaced by the grey squirrel due to disease is a form of "natural selection."
The red squirrel is dying because the grey is spreading a disease. This is what happens when things mix. This has nothing to do with 'natural selection'.
The Bible says God created everything within a specific boundary and designated it an area. The greys are not native and have broken out of their indigeous habitat and are killing off the red squirrels.
If you think otherwise, I don't think you understand the term 'natural selection'.
|
|
Putting the "stud" back in Bible Study
|
|
Posts: 79,909
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Freehold, Iowa
|
|
Re: Another ridiculous evolutionist "argument" REFUDIATED -
12-02-2010, 03:55 AM
I've heard it said that the red squirrels just taste better too. That might have something to do with it.
Here is a partial list from just a few scripture verses:
Hypocrites (Matthew 24:51), The Unforgiving (Mark 11:26), Homosexuals (Romans 1:26, 27), Fornicators (Romans 1:29), The Wicked (Romans 1:29), The Covetous (Romans 1:29), The Malicious (Romans 1:29), The Envious (Romans 1:29), Murderers (Romans 1:29), The Deceitful (Romans 1:29), Backbiters (Romans 1:30), Haters of God (Romans 1:30), The Despiteful (Romans 1:30), The Proud (Romans 1:30), Boasters (Romans 1:30), Inventors of evil (Romans 1:30), Disobedient to parents (Romans 1:30), Covenant breakers (Romans 1:31), The Unmerciful (Romans 1:31), The Implacable (Romans 1:31), The Unrighteous (1Corinthians 6:9), Idolaters (1Corinthians 6:9), Adulterers (1Corinthians 6:9), The Effeminate (1Corinthians 6:9), Thieves (1Corinthians 6:10), Drunkards (1Corinthians 6:10), Reviler (1Corinthians 6:10), Extortioners (1Corinthians 6:10), The Fearful (Revelation 21:8), The Unbelieving (Revelation 21:8), The Abominable (Revelation 21:8), Whoremongers (Revelation 21:8), Sorcerers (Revelation 21:8), All Liars (Revelation 21:8)
|
|
Confirmed Enemy of God
BANNED from Landover -- Aeternal Damnation Assured
|
|
Posts: 56
Join Date: Nov 2010
|
|
Re: Another ridiculous evolutionist "argument" REFUDIATED -
12-10-2010, 02:42 AM
lol, refudiated.
|
|
Biblical Poet, Warrior and Scholar Biblical Black Belt Jr. Pastor
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 6,232
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
|
Re: Another ridiculous evolutionist "argument" REFUDIATED -
12-10-2010, 04:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by clownbaby
lol, refudiated.
|
You clearly misunderestimate the changing nature of the English language!
|
Unsaved trash
|
|
Posts: 144
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: USA
|
|
Re: Another ridiculous evolutionist "argument" REFUDIATED -
12-10-2010, 04:18 PM
Ha probably becuase hunters' selection of nature finds the red ones make better clothing
|
|
Landover Security Superviser Asset Loss Prevention and Personal Security Expert NOT angry and positively NOT Gay
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 18,555
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Freehold Iowa
|
|
Re: Another ridiculous evolutionist "argument" REFUDIATED -
12-10-2010, 04:23 PM
No, the answer is simple. God's Wrath, as explained in the Theory Punctuated Smiting. The red squirrels are clearly a bunch of degenerates into butt sex so God is killing them off one by one, slowly in horrible ways.The increase in gray (as in not gay) squirrels is just The Good Lord's angels creating replacements for the red squirrels who have been destroyed by God.
Time to reclaim our FREEDOM from the “Mullah in Chief” and his growing activist voter hoards of socialists, communists, anti-Semites, anti-Christians, atheists, radical gays and lesbians, feminists, illegal immigrants, Muslims, anti-Anglo whites and others.
Hot Must ReadThreads!
Time to come clean on Benghazi Mr Obama!
|
|
Forum Member
Forum Member
|
|
Posts: 903
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Knockin' on God's door
|
|
Re: Another ridiculous evolutionist "argument" REFUDIATED -
12-10-2010, 07:36 PM
I always thought it was quite obvious - the flamboyant Red Squirrels are raving homosexuals and are being punished by God just like that damnable queer "Yangze River Pink Dolphin".
|
|
Biblical Poet, Warrior and Scholar Biblical Black Belt Jr. Pastor
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 6,232
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
|
Re: Another ridiculous evolutionist "argument" REFUDIATED -
12-11-2010, 08:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ksevio
Ha probably becuase hunters' selection of nature finds the red ones make better clothing
|
Only evolutionists believe disease is an environmental factor. The root of disease in the Bible is sin or faulty thinking or doing. Again this is the case where we have polar opposite beliefs on an issue.
|
Unsaved trash
Under Investigation
|
|
Posts: 18
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Belgium
|
|
Re: Another ridiculous evolutionist "argument" REFUDIATED -
12-15-2010, 01:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heathen_Basher
Only evolutionists believe disease is an environmental factor. The root of disease in the Bible is sin or faulty thinking or doing. Again this is the case where we have polar opposite beliefs on an issue.
|
Well even you people get the flu or a cold. So that means you guy's are sinners and have faulty thinking to if you think that is true.
|
|
Biblical Poet, Warrior and Scholar Biblical Black Belt Jr. Pastor
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 6,232
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
|
Re: Another ridiculous evolutionist "argument" REFUDIATED -
12-15-2010, 02:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff_Celler
Well even you people get the flu or a cold. So that means you guy's are sinners and have faulty thinking to if you think that is true.
|
So according to you, if one population spreads a disease to another, that is 'natural selection'?
I don't know if this is serious?
|
Unsaved trash
Under Investigation
|
|
Posts: 18
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Belgium
|
|
Re: Another ridiculous evolutionist "argument" REFUDIATED -
12-15-2010, 03:26 PM
The natural selection in that would be that those who are to weak to survive the disease dies out and only the ones strong enough to survive it will be able to reproduce.
Two parents with a strong immune system would have a child with a strong immune system. Basic genetics.
|
|
Biblical Poet, Warrior and Scholar Biblical Black Belt Jr. Pastor
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 6,232
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
|
Re: Another ridiculous evolutionist "argument" REFUDIATED -
12-15-2010, 04:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff_Celler
The natural selection in that would be that those who are to weak to survive the disease dies out and only the ones strong enough to survive it will be able to reproduce.
Two parents with a strong immune system would have a child with a strong immune system. Basic genetics.
|
No it isn't.
There is no 'selection'. The disease is a result of the two different squirrels mixing, in nature this is not natural, most animals stick to their own habitats.
You believe if things spread disease, that is evidence for 'natural selection', i find it hard to take this claim seriously as will most who read your posts.
|
Unsaved trash
Under Investigation
|
|
Posts: 18
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Belgium
|
|
Re: Another ridiculous evolutionist "argument" REFUDIATED -
12-15-2010, 04:33 PM
Well I think its hard to believe "god" says. you don't follow my commands so you get sick.
Besides you don't get natural selection, its simple though, the strong survive and can reproduce. The weak can't and they die.
Also why wouldn't animals change habitats? A lot of animal species are generalists, meaning they can survive in quite a lot of habitats. Ravens for example. Or cockroaches those guy's can live in almost any habitat as long as there is food.
|
|
Confirmed Enemy of God
BANNED from Landover -- Aeternal Damnation Assured
|
|
Posts: 145
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Belgium
|
|
Re: Another ridiculous evolutionist "argument" REFUDIATED -
12-15-2010, 04:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heathen_Basher
No it isn't.
There is no 'selection'. The disease is a result of the two different squirrels mixing, in nature this is not natural, most animals stick to their own habitats.
You believe if things spread disease, that is evidence for 'natural selection', i find it hard to take this claim seriously as will most who read your posts.
|
Two different squirrels can't reproduce together, they need to have the same gentic match, not any animal can 'mix', as you say, together, Basic genetic.
Diseases come with overpoulation, if one sort of animal comes too much in a habitat, diseases will come (fact) and they will be more attacked by predators because of their great number, also here principles of evolution, adaptation of the fittest. Those who survive the disease live and those who are better at escaping, evolution and geteics.
|
|
Linguistics and Translation Consultant
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 2,192
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: LBC Language Lab
|
|
Re: Another ridiculous evolutionist "argument" REFUDIATED -
12-15-2010, 04:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff_Celler
Well I think its hard to believe "god" says. you don't follow my commands so you get sick.
Besides you don't get natural selection, its simple though, the strong survive and can reproduce. The weak can't and they die.
Also why wouldn't animals change habitats? A lot of animal species are generalists, meaning they can survive in quite a lot of habitats. Ravens for example. Or cockroaches those guy's can live in almost any habitat as long as there is food.
|
Explain the disappearance of the Elephant Bird of Madagascar or the Moa when the Maoris arrived in Australia or the giant Ground Sloth, Sabre Toothed Tigers....and so on. HArdly pussies in the animal kingdom now , were they?
God 1
Darwin 0
|
|
Biblical Poet, Warrior and Scholar Biblical Black Belt Jr. Pastor
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 6,232
Join Date: Dec 2008
|
|
Re: Another ridiculous evolutionist "argument" REFUDIATED -
12-15-2010, 04:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff_Celler
Well I think its hard to believe "god" says. you don't follow my commands so you get sick.
Besides you don't get natural selection, its simple though, the strong survive and can reproduce. The weak can't and they die.
Also why wouldn't animals change habitats? A lot of animal species are generalists, meaning they can survive in quite a lot of habitats. Ravens for example. Or cockroaches those guy's can live in almost any habitat as long as there is food.
|
Disease is not evidence for natural selection.
|
|
True Christian™ Televangelist Director of Fundraising and Tithing On the Look Out for Wife #6!
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 8,727
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Apostles Grove, Freehold, Iowa
|
|
Re: Another ridiculous evolutionist "argument" REFUDIATED -
12-15-2010, 04:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff_Celler
Or cockroaches those guy's can live in almost any habitat as long as there is food.
|
Speaking of which, if evolution was true, how come cockroaches are not immune to bug spray?
Watch the #1 Televangelist Gospel Hour in the World! "Turn or Burn: Accept Christ or Go to Hell with Rev. Jim Osborne." Check your local cable listings.
|
|
Linguistics and Translation Consultant
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 2,192
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: LBC Language Lab
|
|
Re: Another ridiculous evolutionist "argument" REFUDIATED -
12-15-2010, 04:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheldon
Diseases come if one sort of animal comes too much in a habitat, diseases will come (fact) and they will be more attacked by predators because of their great number,
|
Exactly. So you're saying that masturbation in their own habitats will cause disease to spread amongst them and eventually wipe them out.
I agree with that logic actually. Now all you have to do is to include 'Will of God' in your argument and you've clinched it.
Animal degenerates disgust Him. At the end of the day your 'natural selection' is just a euphemism for Divine Smiting.
Good work.
YIC, McUinnean of that Ilk.
|
Unsaved trash
Under Investigation
|
|
Posts: 18
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Belgium
|
|
Re: Another ridiculous evolutionist "argument" REFUDIATED -
12-15-2010, 05:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lost Sheep McUinnean
Explain the disappearance of the Elephant Bird of Madagascar or the Moa when the Maoris arrived in Australia or the giant Ground Sloth, Sabre Toothed Tigers....and so on. HArdly pussies in the animal kingdom now , were they?
God 1
Darwin 0
|
Simple. Quite a lot of reasons for it actually. Lack of food due to the dying out of prey or the plants they feed on, Disease, changes in the climate that destroyed the habitats they could live in.
Recount that score
God:0
Darwin:1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heathen_Basher
Disease is not evidence for natural selection.
|
Give facts, just you telling me those things will not convince a person, well not a person that thinks for himself anyway.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rev. Jim Osborne
Speaking of which, if evolution was true, how come cockroaches are not immune to bug spray?
|
Because first off evolution needs time, lots of it, Also bug spray is made of a chemical that doesn't exist in nature its artificially created in labs so the cockroaches where never able to develop an immunity
to it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lost Sheep McUinnean
Exactly. So you're saying that masturbation in their own habitats will cause disease to spread amongst them and eventually wipe them out.
I agree with that logic actually. Now all you have to do is to include 'Will of God' in your argument and you've clinched it.
Animal degenerates disgust Him. At the end of the day your 'natural selection' is just a euphemism for Divine Smiting.
Good work.
YIC, McUinnean of that Ilk.
|
You are just twisting his words. So your argument doesn't hold sense.
|
|
Linguistics and Translation Consultant
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 2,192
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: LBC Language Lab
|
|
Re: Another ridiculous evolutionist "argument" REFUDIATED -
12-15-2010, 05:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beth_Celler
Simple. Quite a lot of reasons for it actually. Lack of food due to the dying out of prey or the plants they feed on, Disease, changes in the climate that destroyed the habitats they could live in.
Recount that score
God:0
Darwin:1
|
Cheating with the score doesn't make you right. None of those things happened to the animals I mentioned. They were either smitten or eaten or smitten and eaten by those God deemed worthy of the protein intake.
Let's change that back to:
God 27
Darwin: minus20
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beth_Celler
You are just twisting his words. So your argument doesn't hold sense.
|
No. It's YOU who's twisting MY words. YOUR argument is the one lacking sense. Rumour and vagueness and fuzzy wuzzy fluffy logic is all you have there.
Do NOT twist my words please.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Powered by Jesus - vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
Content Landover Baptist Forums © 1620, 2022 all rights reserved
|