[Bobby-Joe]

Wired draws the obvious conclusion that Bush was RIGHT after all about Iraq.
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010...ising-results/

Combing threw the vast number of documents realized by the Wikileaks traitors.

But even late in the war, WMDs were still being unearthed. In the summer of 2008, according to one WikiLeaked report, American troops found at least 10 rounds that tested positive for chemical agents. "These rounds were most likely left over from the [Saddam]-era regime. Based on location, these rounds may be an AQI [Al Qaeda in Iraq] cache. However, the rounds were all total disrepair and did not appear to have been moved for a long time."

American Thinker discusses this revulation that Bush was right all along

As for WMD, no new weapons were found but the fact that there was so much of it still in Iraq after the UN was supposed to have gotten rid of it is significant [sic]. Don't expect any apologies from the rest of the world or even any acknowledgment that they were wrong. The narrative is set and nothing will change it.

The Blaze weighs in
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/wiki...-wmds-in-iraq/

Will this new information quell the debate at all?

Not likely. While the weapons were found and used against American troops, Bush detractors like Andrew Sullivan of the Atlantic argued that they were "degraded left-overs from the earlier Saddam era" and "not part of an ongoing stockpile program."

What do you think? Does this new information lend any more justification to the U.S. military action in Iraq?

Note this is not some discredited source like the yellow uranium or that Nigerian prince was trying to sell Saddam or that Ukrainian enrichment centrifuge tube extender website, these are hard FACT released by liberal TRAITORS in the government and can be trusted.