[Pastor Ezekiel]

Now THIS is an idea who's time has come! I only wish Sister Marla Jennings had offered an incentive like this when I purchased my rolling estate. I'd have gotten a free arsenal!

Real estate agent gives guns to homebuyers

HOUSTON (Reuters) - A Texas real estate agent looking to add more bang to her business is offering clients a free Glock pistol if they buy a home from her.

Julie Upton, a Houston-area real estate agent, spurned traditional buyer incentives like free gasoline cards or home improvement store gift certificates.

Instead, she placed an advertisement offering a pistol with the purchase of any home worth at least $150,000 in the monthly publication, "Family Gun."

"We thought it would be a good way to entice the right kind of people to buy in our community," Upton said. "And whether people want the gun or not, it has stirred up a lot of attention."

Upton has given away twenty pistols to True Christians™ who purchased homes from her. The guns cost about $500 each.

And so far the advertisement has not generated negative attention from the communist anti-gun lobby, she said.

In Texas, no license is required to own a rifle, shotgun or handgun, but a permit is needed to carry a concealed weapon, according to the National Rifle Association.

She'd better be careful there. $150,000 isn't much. My dog kennels cost more than $150,000. Even a nigra could afford that much, and we sure don't need any more armed nigras running around.

Maybe we pastors should consider a program like this for saving souls. Those free Play station 3's have gotten pretty spendy. The kids might appreciate a Glock more than some mindless game console....And Praise Jesus they are attractive.

[Brother Temperance]

Originally Posted by Pastor Ezekiel

She'd better be careful there. $150,000 isn't much. My dog kennels cost more than $150,000. Even a nigra could afford that much, and we sure don't need any more armed nigras running around.

We don't need any more unsaved hellbound scum like that running around with guns, either:
Leviticus 19:28 Ye shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor print any marks upon you: I am the LORD.

[Elmer Christianson]

Originally Posted by Pastor Ezekiel

Now THIS is an idea who's time has come! I only wish Sister Marla Jennings had offered an incentive like this when I purchased my rolling estate. I'd have gotten a free arsenal!



She'd better be careful there. $150,000 isn't much. My dog kennels cost more than $150,000. Even a nigra could afford that much, and we sure don't need any more armed nigras running around.

Maybe we pastors should consider a program like this for saving souls. Those free Play station 3's have gotten pretty spendy. The kids might appreciate a Glock more than some mindless game console....And Praise Jesus they are attractive.

Brother Zeke, are there any more pictures of that gun? Maybe a little more vertical and less horizontal?

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Originally Posted by Elmer Christianson

Brother Zeke, are there any more pictures of that gun? Maybe a little more vertical and less horizontal?

Sorry, but that's the only one I found. I think its the real estate agent posing with the glock she's giving away...What a mouth watering offer!

[Jesus is Lord]

Originally Posted by Pastor Ezekiel

Sorry, but that's the only one I found. I think its the real estate agent posing with the glock she's giving away...What a mouth watering offer!

If it is then she is not only breaking Leviticus 19:28 with that piercing she is also breaking Deuteronomy 22:4-6 by wearing jeans, which are men's clothing. She is also very close to showing off her upper unmentionables like a tramp.

Deuteronomy 22:4-6: The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God.

[Brother V]

Originally Posted by Jesus is Lord

If it is then she is not only breaking Leviticus 19:28 with that piercing she is also breaking Deuteronomy 22:4-6 by wearing jeans, which are men's clothing. She is also very close to showing off her upper unmentionables like a tramp.

Deuteronomy 22:4-6: The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God.

While trousers are generally considered male attire. I don't see how any man could wear those pants. The crotch area is much too tight. While it might be fun to get into those jeans, I don't think I could do it.

You know... because of my ... er... condition.

Go Jesus

YIC
V

[Jesus is Lord]

Originally Posted by Brother V

While trousers are generally considered male attire. I don't see how any man could wear those pants. The crotch area is much too tight. While it might be fun to get into those jeans, I don't think I could do it.

You know... because of my ... er... condition.

Go Jesus

YIC
V

Those particular pants may not be designed for men to wear as it was probably designed by some feminazi. Pants of almost any kind are male attire, women should only wear skirts. The belt she is wearing also looks quite male, it lloks like the kind of belt a father would wear, the kind he would use to discipline his children.

[Brother V]

Originally Posted by Jesus is Lord

Those particular pants may not be designed for men to wear as it was probably designed by some feminazi. Pants of almost any kind are male attire, women should only wear skirts. The belt she is wearing also looks quite male, it lloks like the kind of belt a father would wear, the kind he would use to discipline his children.

Brother, I've prayed over this many many times. "That which pertaineth unto a man" is one of those verses that can be read many ways. In my opinion, this verse means solely man's clothing. Not clothing designed to simulate men's clothing.

If you look further in the verse, you see this "neither shall a man put on a woman's garment". Does this mean men cannot wear a robe (like a dress)? Didn't Jesus wear a robe? Does this mean men cannot wear a skirt? A kilt is a skirt and there are very few things more masculine than a man in a kilt.

Friend, it is acceptable for women to wear trousers, so long as they are purchased in the women's department of the store.

It is not acceptable for a girlfriend to sleep in one of your shirts, nor can she tramp around in boxer shorts. Women's attire must be purchased in the women's department, just as men's in the men's. Anything that is uni-sex should be burned and stores that sell uni-sex attire should be firebombed.

In my opinion, women may wear trousers and not be committing a sin. Men may wear a kilt and not be committing a sin. It's all in the cut of the fabric, as to if a sin is committed.

I know this may cause some discourse and dialague between the bretheren, but that's what we're here for.

Go Jesus!!!

YIC
V

[Jesus is Lord]

Originally Posted by Brother V

Brother, I've prayed over this many many times. "That which pertaineth unto a man" is one of those verses that can be read many ways. In my opinion, this verse means solely man's clothing. Not clothing designed to simulate men's clothing.

If you look further in the verse, you see this "neither shall a man put on a woman's garment". Does this mean men cannot wear a robe (like a dress)? Didn't Jesus wear a robe? Does this mean men cannot wear a skirt? A kilt is a skirt and there are very few things more masculine than a man in a kilt.

Friend, it is acceptable for women to wear trousers, so long as they are purchased in the women's department of the store.

It is not acceptable for a girlfriend to sleep in one of your shirts, nor can she tramp around in boxer shorts. Women's attire must be purchased in the women's department, just as men's in the men's. Anything that is uni-sex should be burned and stores that sell uni-sex attire should be firebombed.

In my opinion, women may wear trousers and not be committing a sin. Men may wear a kilt and not be committing a sin. It's all in the cut of the fabric, as to if a sin is committed.

I know this may cause some discourse and dialague between the bretheren, but that's what we're here for.

Go Jesus!!!

YIC
V

Thank you for your wise words, Brother. I understand better now what men and women can and can't wear.

Praise Jesus!

YIC,
Jesus is Lord

[Pastor Al E Pistle]

I can also recommend the Fobus® holster the young man is wearing.

[Bobby-Joe]

Originally Posted by Brother V

While trousers are generally considered male attire. I don't see how any man could wear those pants. The crotch area is much too tight. While it might be fun to get into those jeans, I don't think I could do it.

You know... because of my ... er... condition.

Go Jesus

YIC
V

Poor Brother V. I though you brought up your condition to the Landover Christian Benevolence Committee, did they turn you down again V?

[Brother V]

Originally Posted by Bobby-Joe

Poor Brother V. I though you brought up your condition to the Landover Christian Benevolence Committee, did they turn you down again V?

Ezekiel 23:20 For she doted upon their paramours, whose flesh is as the flesh of asses, and whose issue is like the issue of horses.

Alas, thus is the burden I have to bear and bear alone. I have no Simon... or simone either.

Mark 15:21 And they compel one Simon a Cyrenian, who passed by, coming out of the country, the father of Alexander and Rufus, to bear his cross.

Due to my condition, I've become like Paul.

1 Corinthians 7:7 For I would that all men were even as I myself. But every man hath his proper gift of God, one after this manner, and another after that.

YIC
V

[Pastor Ezekiel]

I wonder if this deal is still on?