[Mary Etheldreda]

Let's play a game! Answer the question as if you had rejected Jesus' Saving Grace.
I'll start:


"Moral Progress is when a society throws away the shackles of respect, honor, nobility, liberty, and family, and embraces instead whatever physical impulse evolution plants in one's materialistic mind at the time. For me, that might translate to leaving my children at home and going out dressed like a harlot, spreading my legs for any Tom, Dick, or Harry to come along and plant his seed in my eager womb, just so I can run to get it aborted."

Atheists have no moral code,
so anything and everything is fair in the game of moral progress!

[Titus Templeton]

I can talk like a liberal. Listen.

We can not eat anything that has nerve system.
Suffering in any way is immoral. The same goes for making war. We simply have no moral reason to stop the baddies killing innocent Christians. It was wrong trying to stop the nazis and it is wrong stopping ISIS. Like the great Mahadma Ghandi has said just let them kill you and slowly but surely the world changes to the better.

Moral progress is when any man can enter a women's shower and tell them he feels like a women today and he wants to shower with them.
And if the women in the shower give a warm smile and even offer to share their soap with him then we have reached a new better reality and a better place for everyone.

A better planet that we can share with our friends the muslims. A better planet that gives women double the income of a man for half the work.

[Redeemed Papist]

I heard a liberal tell me the other day that punching queers and dragging them screaming and kicking into fathering soldiers for Christ was wrong. He was screaming at me like a little girl while acting like God actually creates gays to be gay.

They are so twisted up. As if God creates nancy boy queers in His image.

Genesis 1:28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth

I bet that lib was also a vegan and can't even bring himself to choke a chicken for his dinner.

[handmaiden]

Hmmm . . . If I were thinking like a liberal I would say that we need to give animals the vote. After all, animals have rights and anything else would be inhumane. But I wouldn't use words like "inhumane" because that suggests the humans are the natural bearers of some moral standard and it would marginalize animals and no doubt make them cry.

Fluffily Yours,


Handmaiden

[Redeemed Papist]

That's not the only thing they will do with animals. If a man can fornicate with another man in his exit chute then it's only a matter of time before they are anally raping horses and sheep and marrying them. It wouldn't surprise me if one of them put together one of their "logically sound" arguments for betrothing their daughters to a carrot!

[handmaiden]

Originally Posted by Redeemed Papist

That's not the only thing they will do with animals. If a man can fornicate with another man in his exit chute then it's only a matter of time before they are anally raping horses and sheep and marrying them. It wouldn't surprise me if one of them put together one of their "logically sound" arguments for betrothing their daughters to a carrot!

And I can see them offering their daughters to be torn apart by a pack of wolves in order to save themselves.


Distastefully Yours,


Handmaiden

[Redeemed Papist]

Originally Posted by handmaiden

And I can see them offering their daughters to be torn apart by a pack of wolves in order to save themselves.

What's stopping them? They have no moral code. They'd never obey the voice of God like Abraham did. They just please themselves and don't even beat their children.

[handmaiden]

Originally Posted by Redeemed Papist

What's stopping them? They have no moral code. They'd never obey the voice of God like Abraham did. They just please themselves and don't even beat their children.

Without the Voice of God they are just listening to themselves. Mind you, there are some accusers suggesting that we here at LBC are doing the same thing. But I continually search my heart, because I don't want that to be the case.


Heart-Searchingly Yours,


Handmaiden

[Levi Jones]

Moral progress is a world where whitey is dead.

[Titus Templeton]

Moral Progress is when I can make you call me superman.

[I Man Rastafari]

Moral progress will occur when the old white men of America finally accept their responsibility and agree to pay reparations to the Black man for centuries of slavery. The Black man built America with their sweat and it is time for their descendants to be rewarded for these efforts. I feel that a first class ticket to Africa and 6.2 million dollars would be a fair payment for every Black person in America. I will spare you the complicated formula that I used to come up with those figures but I think it would be very fair to everyone.

[Johny Joe Hold]

Moral progress is when naked homers can have butt sex on the church roof.

[WilliamJenningsBryan]

Rejecting the Saving Grace of Jesus is also rejecting the certainty of Gods inevitable punishment for sin in the form of a one-way ticket to an eternity in the Lake of Fire. Welcome to the world of the Clinton's.

[handmaiden]

Originally Posted by WilliamJenningsBryan

Rejecting the Saving Grace of Jesus is also rejecting the certainty of Gods inevitable punishment for sin in the form of a one-way ticket to an eternity in the Lake of Fire. Welcome to the world of the Clinton's.

Very true, Brother WJB. Do you know that once, many years ago, when I was attempting to convey the significance of Jesus in the worldview of believers, a young woman actually turned to me and asked what being saved meant? The concept held no resonance for her at all.


Take away the fear of unending, unendurable torment and people don't even think about accepting Jesus as Lord and that means that they live morally corrupt lives powered by no other impetus than their lower animal urges.


I never would have thought to give thanks for false Christians, but at least the streets are marginally safe in most places because most people have at least a semblance of respect for the Judeo-Christian ethic.


Removing all traces of that divine influence on people's lives and larger society-- THAT is thinking like a liberal.


Unthinkingly Yours,
Handmaiden

[MitzaLizalor]

Moral progress is not needing a moral compass.

It's the difference between anarchy and anarchism, the path of our journey as a species and isn't it exciting! All around us a paradigm shift is underway; as hackneyed stereotypes collapse the genderist elite implodes and religion simply fades away.

Yes, the future is bright and I'm particularly encouraged by how successful the multicultural demonstration has been as we step boldly into the future, putting the past behind us.

Now that really is progress.

[Alvin Moss]

Moral progress will be served by embracing socialism so that we can all be equally poor and ride bicycles like the people in Denmark do. This will prevent those who are simply lucky from obtaining things the rest of us cannot afford.

[MitzaLizalor]

Originally Posted by Alvin Moss

Moral progress will be served by embracing socialism so that we can all be equally poor and ride bicycles like the people in Denmark do. This will prevent those who are simply lucky from obtaining things the rest of us cannot afford.

“And since Marx we have understood why! Sure, eight years before The Communist Manifesto was given to us Pierre-Joseph Proudhon[anarchist] had waffled on a similar theme yet had to introduce defunct concepts like "God" and "Heaven" but we had advanced a bit more by 1848 v.i.

Karl Marx and Frederick Engels Manifesto of the Communist Party 1848

The bourgeoisie keeps more and more doing away with the scattered state of the population, of the means of production, and of property. It has agglomerated population, centralized the means of production, and has concentrated property in a few hands.

Marriage is another defunct property right. And yes, this progress was also anticipated.

The bourgeois claptrap about the family and education, about the hallowed correlation of parents and child, becomes all the more disgusting, the more, by the action of Modern Industry, all the family ties among the proletarians are torn asunder, and their children transformed into simple articles of commerce and instruments of labor.

But you Communists would introduce community of women, screams the bourgeoisie in chorus.

The bourgeois sees his wife a mere instrument of production. He hears that the instruments of production are to be exploited in common, and, naturally, can come to no other conclusion that the lot of being common to all will likewise fall to the women.

He has not even a suspicion that the real point aimed at is to do away with the status of women as mere instruments of production.

For the rest, nothing is more ridiculous than the virtuous indignation of our bourgeois at the community of women which, they pretend, is to be openly and officially established by the Communists. The Communists have no need to introduce free love; it has existed almost from time immemorial.

Our bourgeois, not content with having wives and daughters of their proletarians at their disposal, not to speak of common prostitutes, take the greatest pleasure in seducing each other's wives. (Ah, those were the days!)

Bourgeois marriage is, in reality, a system of wives in common and thus, at the most, what the Communists might possibly be reproached with is that they desire to introduce, in substitution for a hypocritically concealed, an openly legalized system of free love. For the rest, it is self-evident that the abolition of the present system of production must bring with it the abolition of free love springing from that system, i.e., of prostitution both public and private.

The hallucination of national pride, itself a pathetic construct, also fades away just as we see happening today! Marx understood our future but had no magic ball to scry in for information. That's the difference between overly-verbose-claptrap-of-state and genuine inspiration.

Yes, socialist sensibilities are a great leap forward in Moral Progress!

And as America embraces this new ideal, overturning anachronistic and restrictive marriage mores, endorsing the rich diversity of unions cherished by the proletariat but crushed underfoot by callous and grasping tyrants who divide populations by race and seek to enslave us all, so the dream grows.

But it's not a dream anymore!”
LINK TO THE TEXT OF THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO

[I Man Rastafari]

I know that my white friends are being sarcastic when they make the comments they have made about progress but all of these comments are how the world should be. The old white men have kept the world in slavery for too long and they must be overthrown so that everyone will be brothers and equal in all things. The Black man will of course be slightly more equal than everyone else because that is the plan of Jah Rastafari.

[handmaiden]

Originally Posted by I Man Rastafari

I know that my white friends are being sarcastic when they make the comments they have made about progress but all of these comments are how the world should be. The old white men have kept the world in slavery for too long and they must be overthrown so that everyone will be brothers and equal in all things. The Black man will of course be slightly more equal than everyone else because that is the plan of Jah Rastafari.

Hmm. . .Where have I heard that before?


"All animals are equal but some are more equal"


Somewhat Literately Yours,


Handmaiden

[Brother Gonzalez]

Moral progress is when rich people give all their money to the poor people, for no compensation at all. Of course, this excludes rich liberal people, because they think about the poor people all day; so they can keep their money. Only republican rich people is due to give away their money.