[Cranky Old Man]

Obama has done it again. Throwing away billions and billions of hard earned American tax dollars on yet another NASA hoax. Obama immediately gave a speech after this hoax landing claiming, I am not kidding here, just click the link, that all this nonsense will "save taxpayer dollars". Spending money to save money, only a democrat can say something so idiotic. The Bible warns us for people like Obama: Matthew 24:24 "For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect."

Let's look at the facts here. NASA has openly admitted that it is incapable of putting people in space. According to NASA only the Russians are capable of manned space flight. No doubt a Russian hoax, but that's a different story.

And even though NASA has openly admitted they are incapable of putting humans in space they still haven't admitted to the Moon landing being a big hoax! As if it would be possible to bring someone to the Moon without putting them in space first.

Proof of the Moon landing hoax (you can clearly see the flag moving due to the wind, even though NASA claims there is no air on the Moon, and also the shadows are clearly caused by multiple light sources):


Fake image of Curiosity landing (even a child can see it is fake, and if it would be real, as NASA claims, then what or who made this picture...:


This image of someone's backyard is worth billions of tax dollars?


Yet more proof NASA is a bunch of liars, shadows from multiple dirctions:


Another one, the shadow shows the "Sun" is behind, yet the front the suit is clearly highlighted by a light source:

[Felicity]

My father always says that Obama is the worst thing that ever happened to America.

[Titus Templeton]

If you look at the clip below you see that these NASA - "experts" are nothing more then homosexuals lusting after each other.

[Pastor Ed Lowman]

Originally Posted by Titus Templeton

If you look at the clip below you see that these NASA - "experts" are nothing more then homosexuals lusting after each other.

I knew it and I've known it for a long time. All these lies and paperwork and "calculations" about so-called "space exploration" are more than enough to create a red tape-based smokescreen for satellite-assisted bukkake. This video is yet more evidence of that.

[Zechariah Smyth]

I'm pretty sure I saw "Tonka" on the side of that thing.

[GayAssDemon]

OMG YOU'RE SO RIGHT

[Mary Etheldreda]

Originally Posted by GayAssBaptist

OMG YOU'RE SO RIGHT

But of course! Cranky Old Man may be cranky, and he may be a day older than water, but he's like a bloodhound after a trail of stench when it comes to finding facts.

Now, why don't you hop on over to our friendly Introductions Forum so we can get to know you and greet you properly!

[ilovethesatanicscience]

Science

Take a table for example, how do you know if a table still exists if you go out of a room and can no longer see it? For all you know the table could pack up and disappear out of the window, it could visit the international space station, maybe even fly to the moon. All this before returning to the exact spot an instant before you re enter the room. This of course is a pretty unlikely scenario! But one we cant rule out. It is much simpler to assume the table stays put when we are not there, it is our best fit model of 'reality'.

This is essentially what they do in science, they create best fit models of how we believe the universe actually works. The ancient Greeks were the first to build such scientific models, they suggested that the earth was a large sphere motionless and fixed at the center of the universe. But later pioneering scientists like Copernicus and Galileo found a much simpler and revolutionary model to describe the same observations. They proposed that the earth itself was spinning and orbiting the sun at the same time along with all the other planets. But neither can be said to be actually true because they, like all models are just models in our heads that best fit the reality we perseve. In fact physicists are forever creating more sophisticated models and the truth of their models, is impossible to establish. A good example of this came in the 1960's when physicists came up with the really tiny bits of matter called 'Quarks' . These Quarks were posed to be the building blocks of the sub atomic particle called a proton. The model suggested that these Quarks were held together by a force that got stronger as you tried to separate them. This model also implied that there is no way one could ever see a single isolated Quark. At first some people were skeptical, if something by its very definition can never been seen, can it be said to exist? Does it make sense to say that Quarks are real or not? In the large Hadron Collider, scientists are on the search for Quarks and other sub-atomic particles, by smashing protons together at incredible speeds, we can study the behavior of the tiniest atoms in nature. Although we have not directly observed Quarks, we have seen evidence of particle behavior predicted by the Quark model. So do Quarks exists? The answer is they exist in as far as they are a model that works. That is as far as we can go, this is called the concept of model based reality.

Reality

Most of share the common sense view of what reality is, the world around us exists interdependently from us. Its full of real things, that are really there, but science is unraveling this basic assumption. Our reality is a riot of sound, color, taste and smell all based on the many bits of information our senses are feeding our brains. But once we except that the mind is separate from the body, governed by physics yet unpredictable, reality itself begins to break down. It becomes subjective!

[John the Monkey Worshiper]

Originally Posted by Titus Templeton

If you look at the clip below you see that these NASA - "experts" are nothing more then homosexuals lusting after each other.

You have to be incredibly stupid if you don't understand why the flag is moving and why there seemed to be two light sources. They went to the moon and mars

[godswraith1]

Originally Posted by Cranky Old Man

Obama has done it again. Throwing away billions and billions of hard earned American tax dollars on yet another NASA hoax. Obama immediately gave a speech after this hoax landing claiming, I am not kidding here, just click the link, that all this nonsense will "save taxpayer dollars". Spending money to save money, only a democrat can say something so idiotic. The Bible warns us for people like Obama: Matthew 24:24 "For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect."

Let's look at the facts here. NASA has openly admitted that it is incapable of putting people in space. According to NASA only the Russians are capable of manned space flight. No doubt a Russian hoax, but that's a different story.

And even though NASA has openly admitted they are incapable of putting humans in space they still haven't admitted to the Moon landing being a big hoax! As if it would be possible to bring someone to the Moon without putting them in space first.

Proof of the Moon landing hoax (you can clearly see the flag moving due to the wind, even though NASA claims there is no air on the Moon, and also the shadows are clearly caused by multiple light sources):


Fake image of Curiosity landing (even a child can see it is fake, and if it would be real, as NASA claims, then what or who made this picture...):


This image of someone's backyard is worth billions of tax dollars?

How can you say a flag is moving in a still image

There was a metal rod put threw the flag to support the fabric if it was not there then the flag would of hung limply And would not of made for such a good photo

Also it was folded in transit which explain the creases And the rid did not fully extend

[Jeremiah Gray]

Originally Posted by godswraith1

How can you say a flag is moving in a still image There was a metal rod put threw the flag to support the fabric if it was not there then the flag would of hung limply And would not of made for such a good photo Also it was folded in transit which explain the creases And the rid did not fully extend

How can that be a real image? We know from the Bible that the earth is flat. Isiah 40:22 - "It is he that sitteth vpon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grashoppers; that stretcheth out the heauens as a curtaine, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwel in" We also know that the Earth has pillars supporting it. Job 9:6 - "Which shaketh the earth out of her place, & the pillars thereof tremble". Obviously NASA is just making these works of art just to cover up the fact that Obama pockets all of their funding.

[Cranky Old Man]

Originally Posted by godswraith1

Also it was folded in transit which explain the creases And the rid did not fully extend

Do you always believe everything NASA says?

I am curious what your explanation for the multiple light sources (clearly caused by studio lamps) on the Moon is. Multiple Suns?

Yet more proof NASA is a bunch of liars, shadows from multiple dirctions:


Yet another one, the shadow shows the "Sun" is behind, yet the front the suit is clearly highlighted by a light source:

[liar mcguillicuddy]

Originally Posted by Cranky Old Man

Do you always believe everything NASA says?

I am curious what your explanation for the multiple light sources (clearly caused by studio lamps) on the Moon is. Multiple Suns?

Yet more proof NASA is a bunch of liars, shadows from multiple dirctions:


Yet another one, the shadow shows the "Sun" is behind, yet the front the suit is clearly highlighted by a light source:

There's a hilarious music video called Dick-Riding Obama. You'll never guess what tv show it's from.

[Zechariah Smyth]

Like there would be shadows on the moon in the first place...HELLOOOOOOO! How would you cast a shadow on something that is shining?

(Genesis 1:16) "And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also."

Atheists are so DUMB.

YiC,

Zech

[Jooosha]

[loveoneanother2]

Thank you.

[Rev. Edward Clement]

Originally Posted by loveoneanother2

Thank you.

Friend, your post has no point except a demonstration of your own desire and how you enjoy smelling your one flatulence.

Apparently, you are an individual of very few words thus, you may possibly be cathiolck.

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Originally Posted by sumdumgai808

I wish to make a simple correction to your statement my friend. The number of Americans who identify themselves as Christian have been steadily decreasing over the years. There was more people in the 1990s that identified as Christian, I believe closer to 85%.

That's not a correction. I said currently 78%. I said nothing about the 1990s, or that there were always 78%.

The influx of Muslims has had a negative impact on the percentage of the population which is Christian, that is true, and the removal of prayer from schools has also left children without guidance.

Even with Christianity being the majority, there is still an extremely small number that can identify them as TrueChristians that follow the bible as strictly as the forum members here.

That is true, as we say frequently.

Fortunately, most of the false Christians still vote Republican and agree with us on major policy issues, like making abortion illegal and ensuring everyone knows this is a Christian nation, especially schoolkids. They also agree with mandatory Bible readings and Christian prayer in all public schools, with a Constitutional amendment to make Christianity the official religion.

As for the "In God We Trust" on the American currency, it was not added to paper currency until 1956. The original, yet unofficial motto of the currency was E pluribus unum. The term was used on various coins since 1864, which was used in part to say that God was on the Union's side when they fought against the south. If I am not mistaken, it was originally a ploy to gain support for the north to say that God was against slavery despite that slavery was okay in the bible.

You are. Mistaken, that is.

http://www.treasury.gov/about/educat...-we-trust.aspx

At no point have I said "this was founded as a Christian nation."

I have said, "This IS a Christian nation."

Note the present tense.

Might want to work on that reading comprehension.

[Zachariah4Christ]

I was so excited to watch the developments of the curiosity landing on Mars. The "fake" picture is of course not real! Even NASA says it's just an artists rendition of the spacecraft!

Either way, I eagerly await the higher resolution colour images that will follow later this week. God has made a magnificent and wonderful universe, and these new discoveries and technological advances are proof that such a vast and wonderful universe could have only been created by a high power.

Praise be to God.

[Redeemed Papist]

Mars is a little moving light on the firmament.