[Remy Lebeau]

Originally Posted by Liberator

Matthew 22:36-40

Do you not read your bible Rev.?
If you do you may find that there are many instances in which it says to do two different things, so how do you decide which one is right?

Another ignorant pick and chooser psuedo christian interpreting the Bible instead of comprehending it.

"Master, which is the great commandment in the law? Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets." - Matthew 22:36-40

Who are my neighbors? Certainly not ungodly abominations.

I'm not allowed to even fraternize with unbelievers much less live along side them.

"Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel?" - 2 Corinthians 6: 14-15

Jesus is a supporter of the laws He gave in the Old Testament.

"Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled." - Matthew 5:17-18

"If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them." - Leviticus 20: 13

[WilliamJenningsBryan]

Originally Posted by Liberator

1)i hope you guys realize that homosexuality is caused by the brain not the penis.

Well, I don't know about that. I've heard some scientifical types say that it is caused by jeans. Now that just does not make much sense, but maybe if the jeans are too tight it cuts off circulation and turns you into one of those castrati type homers. Are you some kind of expert on homers or are you speaking from experience?

I know one thing, my tallywhacker seems to have a mind of its own when it comes to laying pipe for Sarah Palin (if you catch my drift). We need that natural gas from Alaska.

Originally Posted by Liberator

2)wrapping it in foil would only amplify electromagnetic partials.

I'm not sure what you mean by "electromagnetic partials". Foil does shield electromagnetic waves, and as far as "amplifying" them, you need some kind of active device to do that (aluminum foil is entirely passive).

Originally Posted by Liberator

3) there is no such thing as a homo particle.

Would you care to cite your source for this blanket assertion?

Originally Posted by Liberator

4)if you believe what you are saying you are retarded.

Son, I think you are the one that is displaying a lack of intelligence and common sense.

Originally Posted by Liberator

The Large Hadron Collide (LHC) has already been tested numerous times. Each time we have learned more about the beginning of the universe and its birth. Yes there is a chance that it will create a black hole when used, but it has not yet and the probability is very slim. You have about the same chance of teleporting to mars when you walk across the street. Many of these scientists are christian just as you are, its just they live in the 21st century.

Now you are going to have a hard time defending this. Just why is it that we need to know more about the creation of the universe?

[Remy Lebeau]

Originally Posted by Liberator

1)i hope you guys realize that homosexuality is caused by the brain not the penis.

Homersexuralism is a choice made by those too weak of will to fight the influence of demons that can metaphysically infest the rectum of those prone to sin.

2)wrapping it in foil would only amplify electromagnetic partials.

There is nothing electromagnetic about demons.

3) there is no such thing as a homo particle.

What else are we to expect from a gateway to Hell? Prayer particles?

4)if you believe what you are saying you are retarded.

Typical atheist ad hominem attack. The tool of the ignoramus who can't argue his beliefs seeing as they have no foundation.

The Large Hadron Collide (LHC) has already been tested numerous times.

So why are they talking about possible black holes if they already tested it and know better? Who is paying you a spew this dribble? Is is Dawkins? Did he put you up to this?

Each time we have learned more about the beginning of the universe and its birth. Yes there is a chance that it will create a black hole when used, but it has not yet and the probability is very slim. You have about the same chance of teleporting to mars when you walk across the street. Many of these scientists are christian just as you are, its just they live in the 21st century.

Christians do not forsake Jesus, the Creator of the universe, for a group of mortal men who have only been around for 1 percent of the universe's existence. Any True Christian who has read the Bible already knows how everything came to be.

[Gothzilla]

People, lol calm down. The LHC is a circular tube with magnets that make protons go around in circles, and when ready, make them hit other protons. That's all.

[Virginia Day Templeton]

Originally Posted by Gothzilla

People, lol calm down. The LHC is a circular tube with magnets that make protons go around in circles, and when ready, make them hit other protons. That's all.

Why do you believe in protons?

[Gothzilla]

Originally Posted by Virginia D. Templeton

Why do you believe in protons?

I have never found a plausible alternative to the model of the atom (neutrons, protons, and electrons). Electrons are responsible for electricity, so I'm sure they exist, as sure as I am electricity exists. If it weren't for protons, electrons wouldn't have a reason to stay on atoms, making conductivity impossible. I see that some metals conduct electricity, so I conclude that protons exist.

[Remy Lebeau]

Originally Posted by Gothzilla

I have never found a plausible alternative to the model of the atom (neutrons, protons, and electrons). Electrons are responsible for electricity, so I'm sure they exist, as sure as I am electricity exists. If it weren't for protons, electrons wouldn't have a reason to stay on atoms, making conductivity impossible. I see that some metals conduct electricity, so I conclude that protons exist.

What exactly makes the atomic model plausible?

How do you KNOW that electrons are responsible for electricity?

Seems to me your entire belief system is based on assumptions.

You have never seen an atom. You have never seen a molecule. Your belief in such things is entirely based on blind faith. Brother Brooks debunked the myth of atoms a while ago. Food for thought.

[Teflon©]

Originally Posted by Remy Lebeau

What exactly makes the atomic model plausible?

How do you KNOW that electrons are responsible for electricity?

Seems to me your entire belief system is based on assumptions.

You have never seen an atom. You have never seen a molecule. Your belief in such things is entirely based on blind faith. Brother Brooks debunked the myth of atoms a while ago. Food for thought.

You have never seen wind either, yet we know it exists. And you never have seen bacteria or viruses with you naked eye but still they exist. It's not because you can't see them they are not real. If you use a very powerful microscope you can see molecules too. And why do scientist know certain things? Because they investigate them and repeat their findings and tests over and over again to show they are reproducible, only when the tests can be reproduced they are valid. Saying that something is not real because you can't see them is plain dumb, there are dozens of things you can't see while there are all around us, just think about radiowaves or radioactivity, both are invisible but still you can hear radiowaves on the radio every day if you want and you can get sick and die if the level of radioactivity is to high.

[Glendora Christianson]

Dear Lord! I just glanced at this thread's title, and I don't even want to tell you folks what kind of collider brother Percy was talking about . . . now that I put on my reading glasses, I feel much better.

[Remy Lebeau]

Originally Posted by Teflon©

You have never seen wind either, yet we know it exists.

I've felt wind. I've seen wind carry other objects within its grasp. No one has ever seen, smelt, felt, tasted or otherwise interacted with an atom.

And you never have seen bacteria or viruses with you naked eye but still they exist.

I've seen plenty of micro-demons and we know that curses exist because of the effects they have on individuals and societies.

It's not because you can't see them they are not real. If you use a very powerful microscope you can see molecules too.

No, you cannot. That is a secular lie which only demonstrates your own ignorance on the subject. Do you atheist believe everything you're told without evidence? No one has ever seen an atom or molecule. Given the supposed small mass of protons and the relatively HUGE space between protons and electrons and so-called random ultra fast orbit of electrons, it would be impossible to view an entire molecule. Athests just show their gullible peons a computerized representation of an atom and the idiots accept it hook, line and sinker. I can make up anything and claim it's too small to see, but have a computer representation of it. Would you believe in tini tiny unicorns if it was printed in Scientific Weekly?

And why do scientist know certain things? Because they investigate them and repeat their findings and tests over and over again to show they are reproducible, only when the tests can be reproduced they are valid.

You can't test what you cannot see, hear, feel or taste. And more importantly; what does not exist. I take it you're not a scientist. Yet you think you are knowledgable about something you have never tested yourself; something that you are merely taking somebody else's word on. You're no better than an illiterate catholic or salad bar christian simply believes whatever their lieberal preists and pastors tell them. People who has never read the Bible, but feel they are qualified to debate the tenants of Christianity with True Christians even though they have never read the Bible themselves.

Saying that something is not real because you can't see them is plain dumb, there are dozens of things you can't see while there are all around us, just think about radiowaves or radioactivity, both are invisible but still you can hear radiowaves on the radio every day if you want and you can get sick and die if the level of radioactivity is to high.

Again, you compare something that has "tangible" effects to something that not only makes no sense, but has no "tangible" effects. Did you even read Brother Brook's debunking of atomism? He pretty much put the last nail in the coffin of that idiotic theory.

[friendofdorothy]

Originally Posted by Rev. M. Rodimer

I'll be by for my personal fitting at 6:30 on Sunday.

Thank you for your thoughtful offer of help to all us non-queer gentlemen! You are truly a generous and loving Christian!

REV Why don't you just admit you are a gay man yourself. you look like a big old queer. you have the style of glasses loved by all homos. The hair on your chin is called an ass tickler(used to get your husband/boyfriend/lover in the mood before sex)


Just remember at least 1 in 10 men are gay. so that means you have lots of "friends" here.

[Gothzilla]

Originally Posted by friendofdorothy

Just remember at least 1 in 10 men are gay. so that means you have lots of "friends" here.

Where does that figure come from?

[Star Finder]

The LHC WILL open up a new world! A very small world, granted, but a world which will truely expalin the movements of the stars in the heavens.

You may not know it, but ever since that night on that beach in Cali, I have been observing and travelling to stars in order to determine the motivations of their movements.

The LHC is the best chance we have to reach the pure knowledge of space in time and be FREE!

FREE I SAY!

and there will be no cultists there and note I typed LHC and NOT LBC!

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Originally Posted by Star Finder

The LHC WILL open up a new world! A very small world, granted, but a world which will truely expalin the movements of the stars in the heavens.

(i) I hope it will be a world with spellcheckers (ii) if it’s a very small world, will there be little midgets on it? Those guys could be sold at a fair profit!

You may not know it, but ever since that night on that beach in Cali,

(under the influence of mind-bending drugs…)

I have been observing and travelling to stars in order to determine the motivations of their movements.

I’ll tell you their motivations – God told them to do it. Case closed.

The LHC is the best chance we have to reach the pure knowledge of space in time and be FREE!

I thought someone like you would be more interested in impure knowledge! Ha!

FREE I SAY!

…apart from the several billion dollars costs and millions of annual costs.

and there will be no cultists there and note I typed LHC and NOT LBC!

There would be none of this rubbish in Landover anyway – God has told us everything we need to know – we do NOT need a Hardon Colander to know that God made the world 6000yrs ago – Huh! Even the new VP knows that!

[Bob4God]

Originally Posted by friendofdorothy

REV Why don't you just admit you are a gay man yourself. you look like a big old queer.

The good Reverend is NOT gay!!!!

[friendofdorothy]

Originally Posted by Gothzilla

Where does that figure come from?

The one in to number is a pretty common figure. The 2000 census list 658,000 gay households.

[Born Again Bob]

Dear Friend,

Originally Posted by friendofdorothy

The 2000 census list 658,000 gay households.

10 years from now, there won't be any at all.

Praise His name!

Yours in Him,
bab <-----

[Star Finder]

Originally Posted by Ezekiel Bathfire

(– Huh! Even the new VP knows that!

no this is "expalin".. i.e. after palin..

[Nobar King]

Are they ever going to turn on that Hadron collider and destroy all those gays, anyway? It seems like they're waiting for something special to happen. Just light it off, guys. We'll take care of the refuse, afterwards.

[Teflon©]

Originally Posted by Remy Lebeau

Again, you compare something that has "tangible" effects to something that not only makes no sense, but has no "tangible" effects. Did you even read Brother Brook's debunking of atomism? He pretty much put the last nail in the coffin of that idiotic theory.

I might not be a scientist that works in a research lab or making theoretically models but I worked in various production labs for some years, so don't tell me that atoms don't exists or what they do. Debunking of atomism? He thinks he can explain such a complex matter with a quote on marbles and basketballs? Ridicules to say the least. Many processes need a form of activation with use of a catalyst, need purification or even more complex processes, it's not just drop all the stuff in a bucket and voilà, some processes need dozens of steps to get the right configuration of molecules. If he really wants to show that there aren't any atoms he will have to devise a test to do so, merely saying so is just not gonna cut it. Even the most common processes use atoms to actually work, how else for instance would a photographic negative turn out? Not by some Godly work but simply because you convert silverhalide atoms into silver atoms by means of a developer and in the second phase being disolved by the fixer you use thus creating a negative image. Without atomic interaction such a manouvre would not be possible. but maybe all this is beyond your grasp and you don't understand it, so you are simply deny something you don't understand.