[Didymus Much]

Originally Posted by UNI0NJ4CK

Congratulations 'MitzaLizalor', you have just reinforced your own glaring idiocy!
Do you not understand simple sentence structure? I started my first post saying; I worship neither Jesus, God or Satan. That simply means that I do not worship Jesus, I do not worship God and I do not worship Satan.
That was one sentence, NOT two seperate quotes. I realise I have to make allowances for. Your primitive brain but do I really need to breakdown a simple sentence in order for you to understand its meaning?
You attained stupidity and just kept aiming lower didn't you?

Then a properly grammatic sentence would have been, "I worship neither Jesus, Satan NOR God". Your uneducated choice left the meaning ambiguous (as well as telling us NOTHING about your beliefs, just your habits). A more politic approach would have been to apologize for your sloppy English, and to restate your point more clearly.

Though Mitza may be deluded as to the existence, nature and worship-worthiness of the Abrahamic God, her brain is far from primitive. Show the open-mindedness you profess and read more of her work. She may not convert you, but you will learn a lot. I know I have.

[MitzaLizalor]

Originally Posted by UNI0NJ4CK

You attained stupidity and just kept aiming lower didn't you?

Well by your standards yes, I suppose I did. Thank you for the compliment

I Corinthians 1:18

[Bible Student]

Originally Posted by MitzaLizalor

There is only one Jesus.

Satan or God what?

There are some links here which might be useful for you.

Oh, please MitzaLizalor, don't do that again. I laughed so hard I snorted my coffee and my sides ache.

[Bible Student]

Originally Posted by UNI0NJ4CK

Congratulations 'MitzaLizalor', you have just reinforced your own glaring idiocy!
Do you not understand simple sentence structure? I started my first post saying; I worship neither Jesus, God or Satan. That simply means that I do not worship Jesus, I do not worship God and I do not worship Satan.
That was one sentence, NOT two seperate quotes. I realise I have to make allowances for. Your primitive brain but do I really need to breakdown a simple sentence in order for you to understand its meaning?
You attained stupidity and just kept aiming lower didn't you?

That is the problem. As MitzaLizalor pointed out, your sentence structure is simple. And wrong. She parsed the sentence for you. Remember parsing and diagramming of sentences way back in 6th grade? At least she did you the courtesy of providing a university level link. Mine would have been about 6 years earlier in subject matter.

Neither (not either) implies that none of two choices is the correct one and those two choices are separated by the word nor. You do not use or accompanying neither. Nor does one use a multiple choice of three or more when using neither.

You incorrectly use grade school grammar and yet you insult MitzaLizalor by saying she has a "primitive brain?" Have you heard of the story about the pot and the kettle yet? A word of caution -- notice that MitzaLizalor is an Honorary True Christian™. That is way above you in the pecking order. Let's see if you are intelligent enough to understand what I mean.

[Jack O'fagan]

Have evolutionists managed to find a Crocoduck yet?

Clearly animals do change within their kind. That's Micro evolution as seen within the different breeds of dogs. But evolutionists say that Macro evolution exists and an animal changes into another animal . There has never been ONE example of this happening EVER! Have they found an example? Have they got a Crocoduck to show us yet?

YIC

Jack

[MitzaLizalor]

Originally Posted by Jack O'fagan

Have evolutionists managed to find a Crocoduck yet?

Clearly animals do change within their kind. That's Micro evolution as seen within the different breeds of dogs. But evolutionists say that Macro evolution exists and an animal changes into another animal . There has never been ONE example of this happening EVER! Have they found an example? Have they got a Crocoduck to show us yet?

YIC

Jack

That crocoduck would have so many competitive advantages that they'd be everywhere by now — if evolution were true! And what a fantastic example of "convergent evolution" — if evolution were true! It must be so embarrassing for them when their Darwin-idol is exposed like that.

[fiestagameplayer]

Forty Some Odd Pages In This Thread - ain't gonna read 'em all!

what I saw was a lotta smack and yakking - what about the verses of the Good Book? Where are THE FACTS??

Some of ya missed the boat a bit

what about these verses from the O.T.?

Gen 1:20 - And God said, Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and fowl that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven

Gen 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. The sex of male and female were made here

Gen 2:7 - And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul. note in second chapter - God made man from the dust of the ground
THEN He breathed in the living soul (wasn't there until God breathed it into man!)

Gen 2:8 - And the LORD God planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he had formed.

NOTICE: 10 VERSES LATER HE MADE WOMAN - in the following verse.

Gen 2:18 - And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.

(This is my first post on this forum - I fight for the word as it was supposed to be ...
I fight against God, Incorporated - like a church I saw back in the 70's with the name in HUGE LETTERS on the front of the old converted warehouse in the ghetto CHURCH OF GOD, INC. - boy was I mad when I thought that God came down and started a new business!!! ... hate to miss out on a good money maker)

[Richard the piratefag]

Yaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrr!! who wouldnt believe a book that be 3000 years old.

Originally Posted by Jack O'fagan

Have evolutionists managed to find a Crocoduck yet?

Clearly animals do change within their kind. That's Micro evolution as seen within the different breeds of dogs. But evolutionists say that Macro evolution exists and an animal changes into another animal . There has never been ONE example of this happening EVER! Have they found an example? Have they got a Crocoduck to show us yet?

YIC

Jack

Yaaaaaaarrrrrrr!, dogs were once wolfs ( changed animal ) and dat crocoduck you be talking about is a but foolish example.

[Dan U. Holier]

Originally Posted by GangPlank

Yaaaaaaarrrrrrr!, dogs were once wolfs ( changed animal ) and dat crocoduck you be talking about is a but foolish example.

Why yes of course, dogs were once wolves and ducks were once crocks; tell us some more fairy-tales, puhleeeese!

The macro evolution is unprovable; wait… maybe you can prove it “empirically”? Grab yourself a monkey and evolve me a man; just do it!

YiC, DUH

[Richard the piratefag]

Originally Posted by Dan U. Holier

Why yes of course, dogs were once wolves and ducks were once crocks; tell us some more fairy-tales, puhleeeese!

The macro evolution is unprovable; wait… maybe you can prove it “empirically”? Grab yourself a monkey and evolve me a man; just do it!

YiC, DUH

Well i am back after the lovely mature admins changed my name

How about this... grab me some dirt and make a man, grab me a rib and make a woman or show me someone who can.

[Redeemed Papist]

Originally Posted by Richard the piratefag

Well i am back after the lovely mature admins changed my name

How about this... grab me some dirt and make a man, grab me a rib and make a woman or show me someone who can.

Uh... God.

That wasn't a very hard riddle.

You got any more?

[Richard the piratefag]

Originally Posted by Redeemed Papist

Uh... God.

That wasn't a very hard riddle.

You got any more?

Hmm u said god what a surprise but i said show me not tell me i would like to see this wizard of a man.

[Redeemed Papist]

Originally Posted by Richard the piratefag

Hmm u said god what a surprise but i said show me not tell me i would like to see this wizard of a man.

That's not even a riddle. You're not playing fair.

[Richard the piratefag]

Originally Posted by Redeemed Papist

That's not even a riddle. You're not playing fair.

Neither are your admins by changing my name but hey i`m not here to be fair

[Redeemed Papist]

Originally Posted by Richard the piratefag

Neither are your admins by changing my name but hey i`m not here to be fair

1 Corinthians 13:11 When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things.

[Didymus Much]

Originally Posted by Richard the piratefag

Hmm u said god what a surprise but i said show me not tell me i would like to see this wizard of a man.

Please show Scripture which says God answers to you.

[Richard the piratefag]

Originally Posted by Redeemed Papist

1 Corinthians 13:11 When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things.

Shame your admins cant do the same :

Changing my name to piratefag and saying "i live in my mommy's" closet and saying "drooling retarded" which doesn't really make sense in the context it was used.

Maybe they should take advice from a book they oh so worship.

[Dan U. Holier]

Originally Posted by Richard the piratefag

Hmm u said god what a surprise but i said show me not tell me i would like to see this wizard of a man.

Show me not tell me I would like to see:

• microbes and viruses
• atomic and subatomic particles
• the evolution – not the alleged effects of it.
• the big bang – not the alleged effects of it.
• gravity – not the alleged effects of it.

etc.

Remember, you came to this Godly site and made a bunch of preposterous claims; the burden of proof is on your side.

YiC, DUH

[Richard the piratefag]

Originally Posted by Didymus Much

Please show Scripture which says God answers to you.

i would but i don't take my opinions from 3000 year old books ( give or take a few years) which were not translated correctly into English.

[Redeemed Papist]

Originally Posted by Richard the piratefag

i would but i don't take my opinions from 3000 year old books ( give or take a few years) which were not translated correctly into English.

So far as I can see the only thing you do here is post drug-addled gibberish.

How about you go and properly introduce yourself that we may know you.