[Elmer G. White]

A new claim has emerged. It would be easy to react to it with rage and dismissal, but being an unbiased scholar of Creation Science, it is necessary to examine this outrageous assertion first. I'll expose its main content right away. Atheists are claiming Jesus was married.

...a manuscript dating back to 570 AD and written in Syriac — a Middle Eastern literary language used between the 4th and 8th centuries and related to Aramaic, the language spoken by Jesus...

For the past 160 years, the document has been studied by a few scholars but has been considered pretty unremarkable.
But then Simcha Jacobovici, an Israeli-Canadian film-maker, and Barrie Wilson, a professor of religious studies in Toronto, took a look. After six years of study, they are convinced they’ve uncovered a missing fifth gospel — to add to the four gospels

Let us start by organizing this preposterous and unlikely claim into bite-size morsels.

1. The document was written in AD 570! This is approximately 500 years after the actual Gospels and Epistles that are contained within the New Testament Canon that God wrote through His scribes. While the Gospels contain actual evidence of eye-witness accounts, it is impossible that any eye-witnesses would have been present in AD 570 to tell these later authors about the actual life of Jesus. In addition, the principal investigator is a Jewish film-maker. What made him the expert? Logic 1 - atheists 0.
2. A fifth Gospel?! Missing?! Not so according to the actual Bible! Proverbs 30:5-6 tell us about this! "Every word of God is pure: he is a shield unto them that put their trust in him. Add thou not unto His words, lest he reprove thee, and thou be found a liar." This alone would be sufficient to disprove this ridiculous claim. No additions! Anyone who does that is a liar! Thus, these scholars are liars. Logic 2 - atheists 0.
3. The Syriac language? Yes, it is present in the Bible. Some anecdotal stories (see Daniel 2:4) that are good when acquainting children to God's word were first spoken in Syriac. Why would God replace His proper tongues Hebrew, Greek and American with Syriac? Syria is a country in a sorry state with Islamic swarms fighting each other. This also associates with Peshitta - the not very good Aramaic/Syriac translation of the Gospels that is considered by some atheists the "original text". This is highly unlikely. Thus: Logic 3 - atheists 0.

Now, let us look some of this "new evidence":

According to Jacobovici and Wilson, it tells of Jesus’s marriage through the story of the Old Testament character Joseph and his wife Aseneth... Central to their claim is that Joseph was actually Jesus — and that Aseneth was actually Mary Magdalene.

This is the alleged "manuscript".

4. The Jewish scholar thus asserts that Joseph = Jesus and Aseneth = Mary Magdalene. I could claim that Elmer G. = King David and Esther = my wife. What would that make me? Yes, a lunatic! Logic 4 - atheists 0.

Now we come to the most disgusting part of the new study. It is, however, necessary to inform Good Christians about this scheme to fight against Jesus and God:

After a seven-day wedding feast, the text is said to read: ‘Joseph had intercourse with Aseneth . . . And Aseneth conceived from Joseph and gave birth to Manasseh and his brother Ephraim in Joseph’s house.’...If you look at the cumulative evidence for Jesus’s marriage, it’s getting overwhelming,’ says Jacobovici. ‘This new discovery is probably the most important piece.

5. Basically, all the filth is here. The authors actually claim that Jesus practiced intercourse, that Jesus Christ was a fornicator. If we follow this logic, the following picture emerges. Jesus is God (John 10:30) and as the Only God He is Perfect (Matthew 5:48). We also know that Jesus actually did have a tallywhacker, as He was circumcised (Luke 2:21). As the claim actually contains intercourse, it means that these people claim that Jesus would really have inserted His tallywhacker in an erect state into the cooter of a woman. Jesus as the perfect God would have had the most endowed tallywhacker of all times. This means that these atheists are actually depicting Jesus Christ as a male porn star. God also tells us that only the sinful fallen men of the corrupted world would take on a woman (Ecclesiastes 7:26): "...whoso pleaseth God shall escape from her; but the sinner shall be taken by her." Jesus was not a sinner but was perfect and could not have entered Heaven had he been a fornicator (1 Corinthians 6:9). But we KNOW that Jesus is Heaven (John 20:17) and could not have had "stirrings" or an erect state in His male organ. Thus: logic 5 - atheists 0.
6. They are also making Jesus half man half God with children. This is Gnosticism with Demiurges. We DO KNOW that Jesus was not half a man but Wholly Man, Wholly God, Wholly Holy! He DID NOT have mortal urges of the flesh. Logic 6 - atheists 0.

This is what atheists would make us believe - that Jesus was a man of a massive tallywhacker fornicating all the time with His harlot wife. This did not happen! This is false.

7. Jesus is God. Atheists are mortal men bound to end up in Hell, in the Furnace (Matthew 13:42). Who do you believe? The omniscient God or fallible biased scientists? The answer is OBVIOUS. Logic INFINITE - atheists still only 0.

Case closed.


Yours in Christ,

Elmer

PS. The scientist has "promised" that "Later this week, he will present his findings at a conference hosted by the British Library". Needless to say, we will be following this closely and we are going to rebuke all additional ridiculous claims that might emerge.