[GOD=life]

As we know, at the end of WW2 when the USA single-handedly liberated Europe (not that they deserved it), Japan had the audacity to cowardly declare war on us. The result was that they got two atom bombs dropped on their heads, which really got them to know their place.

So now we have nothing to worry about, right? WRONG! They figured out that they cannot beats us militarily, so they try to corrupt our children through video games and pokemon.

Once Republicans recapture the white house, we can FORCE them to withdraw all their attacks OR ELSE. To give this some punch, we should throw some ATOM BOMBS on them so they know we're serious.

Reasons this won't lead to political fallout:

• Japan is hated throughout the region -- China hates them, Korea hates them, Russians don't care, etc. They will have no allies.
• They aren't Christians, so the entire Western world won't care about them anyway.
• If the French make a fuss, they can get an atom bomb too and surrender to the USA. Even Europeans think the French smell.
• If Africa makes a fuss, we'll just cut their food aid and they will all die within a year.
• If mooslims make a fuss, they can get an atom bomb on their headscarves too.

My suggestion is to build up the pressure throughout 2010, 2011 and the 2012 election cycle. They KNOW what we are capable of, so hopefully they will retreat in 2010 already. Otherwise, the first order of the new Republican President will be to throw an ATOM BOMB on Japan.

And then we'll hopefully have another few decades of peace from these Christ haters.

ARE YOU WITH ME?? FOR THE CHILDREN!!

[Cranky Old Man]

Why wait so long?

[GOD=life]

Originally Posted by Cranky Old Man

Why wait so long?

Because the current president is in league with the enemies of the USA.

Hopefully, he'll be impeached though...

[Cranky Old Man]

Can't we just let Free Market Fred take care of this?

[Gabriel Reproba]

I wasn't sure what all the Nip-Related "Pokemon" stuff was all about, so I went to thier home page. What I saw was a headline that MOCKS JESUS:

[A Follower]

My choice is to kill them all and let God sort them out, because that's how Jesus commanded us to treat foreigners.

1 Corinthians 5
12 For what have I to do to judge them also that are without? do not ye judge them that are within? 13 But them that are without God judgeth. Therefore put away from among yourselves that wicked person.

[Free Market Fred]

Well, I'm afraid that I must raise my voice in objection to this topic.

Atom bombs are a terrible thing. Look at all the property damage they caused in Hiroshima:







This is unacceptable, especially since these days Japan is home to so many big manufacturing corporations. Surely you don't want to destroy the Toyota factory, do you? Even American auto companies like GM and Ford source most of their engine components from Japan. And let's face it, Nikon and Canon cameras are hard to beat. No, it would be a tragic mistake to use conventional nuclear weapons on Japan.

That's why I advocate that instead we use neutron bombs. Unlike primitive atomic and hydrogen bombs, neutron bombs send out a powerful blast of fatal gamma rays, killing people BUT there is only a very small explosive blast. Thus, private property is protected! This is a far more civilized form of warfare.

Neutron bombs do have a few problems though. The intense radiation can damage sensitive electronic microchips. For this reason, you don't want to use them on places where there is a lot of electronics manufacturing, such as Japan's Silicon Valley region. For those areas, I recommend chemical and biological weapons - maybe not quite as fast as neutron bombs, but they get the job done with no property damage.

A win-win situation, as I'm sure you'll all agree.

Praise Jesus!
Brother Fred

[Oakland "Reb" Griner]

Tough to argue with that logic there, Free Market Fred.

A war of conquest would go far in redressing this countries $$ problems, and I for one am certainly tired of only attacking poor countries! Heck, the last prosperous country we attacked was Germany, and they refused to surrender until the whole place was destroyed!

[MarkHenry]

The international community has banned the use of Atomic Bombs. Plus don't forget that the USA has military stationed in Japan to protect that nation.
Please look up your countries relations with another before suggesting genocide.
And doesn't a commandment say "don't kill"?

Plus pokemon are 10 years old, noone cares about them anymore. Why don't you (US) create something fun for your kids, instead of complaining what about what other people offer you. Noone forces those kids to play with japanese toys, its just that they are the most fun and entertaining.

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Originally Posted by MarkHenry

The international community has banned the use of Atomic Bombs.

Most interesting, what is "the International Community" going to do about it if one is used? Wag a finger at us?

Plus don't forget that the USA has military stationed in Japan to protect that nation.

They are there to protect Godly US interests from the yellow peril, not protect the slants.

Having read the above, I suppose you have no further argument?

[GOD=life]

Originally Posted by MarkHenry

And doesn't a commandment say "don't kill"?

I says not to murder. A murder is an immoral killing. It is not immoral to kill people who try to harm your children, now is it?

We don't want to use an atom bomb on Japan, but as history as taught us, that's the ONLY way they will listen.

[Oakland "Reb" Griner]

My goodness, I suppose if the UN tells us 17 times to not nuke something we just might have to listen to them.

[GOD=life]

Brother Fred, it is obvious that you have more experience and insight in this area than I do. I salute you.

[True Disciple]

Originally Posted by Free Market Fred

Neutron bombs do have a few problems though. The intense radiation can damage sensitive electronic microchips. For this reason, you don't want to use them on places where there is a lot of electronics manufacturing, such as Japan's Silicon Valley region. For those areas, I recommend chemical and biological weapons - maybe not quite as fast as neutron bombs, but they get the job done with no property damage.

I think chemical/biological weapons are most suitable. Additionally, can we poison their water supplies? Might be old-fashioned, but it still works!

Depends as well on the manufacturing cost of the weapons we use. Maybe we need to make a more detailed cost-effect analysis...

Originally Posted by GOD=life

Because the current president is in league with the enemies of the USA.

Hopefully, he'll be impeached though...

Maybe we should pray harder for Obama to get assassinated. I will ask if we can move this item to the top of the prayer list next sunday.

[H. Montague Worthington]

Originally Posted by True Disciple

I think chemical/biological weapons are most suitable. Additionally, can we poison their water supplies? Might be old-fashioned, but it still works!

You're probably too young to remember, but in 1964 the liberal hippies put psychadelic drugs in the Chicago water, and the dirty, drug-addicted, bongo-playing hippies forced Corrupt Big City Mayor Richard M. Daley to nominate John Kennedy---- who won over Richard Nixon because of massive voter fraud by ACORN.

So a poisoned water supply has had catastrophic effects before. But in the name of humanitarianism, I would stick with the nuclear weapons.

[GOD=life]

Brother Fred raised an excellent point that we may as well seize the infrastructure instead of destroying something that can be used both for evil (creating Pokemon merchandise) and for good (creating Christian merchandise).

Perhaps a biological agent that attacks only asian DNA would be more suitable. That would make sure that the area is preserved for some time to come.

[John Scopes]

According to the Mayan calendar we will all go into the dark void on Dec 21, 2012. Why not just use the nukes for one last fireworks celebration in the desert southwest on Dec 20, 2012 ?

[Cranky Old Man]

It's starting to look like the UN here. Talk talk talk and still no nukes on Japan.

[True Disciple]

Originally Posted by H. Montague Worthington

So a poisoned water supply has had catastrophic effects before. But in the name of humanitarianism, I would stick with the nuclear weapons.

While it surely is more humanitarian, don't forget that we are talking about godless gibbering Japanese here. They are going to Hell anyway, and everything we can possibly do to them is dwarfed by what Jesus does to them when they arrive there.
Therefore, we can better do it the cheapest way, which I think would be poison. After all, God wants us to be good stewards of the money he blessed us with, unlike liberals who spend their money on God-knows-what kind of luxuries, and then whine about raising taxes of people who use their resources more wisely.
So, I think God would want us to use poison. We will have more money left for the renovation of the Main Chapel that way!

Originally Posted by John Scopes

According to the Mayan calendar we will all go into the dark void on Dec 21, 2012. Why not just use the nukes for one last fireworks celebration in the desert southwest on Dec 20, 2012 ?

I know that you, like all evilutionists, believe in all kinds of irrational, wiccan new age mumbo-jumbo, but the Bible says nothing about 2012. Who would you trust, Jesus or some bronze age barbarians who were too stupid to invent gunpowder by themselves?

[MarkHenry]

Ok easy solution:

Ban all imports from japan. Total cost: 0.01$ (cost of paper to write ban on)

Nuke them. Total cost: Priceless. This would result in a worldwide nuclear war against the USA.

Are you all really so dense? If you NUKE a country, do you expect the rest of the world to ignore this? What about the japanese in your country? Will they ignore this?

Please, before considering starting genocide because you don't like a product of another nation, think about if it is worth to destroy the planet or to attempt to ban the product from your country.