Christian history forum This forum is dedicated to the history of Christianity, and its impact on the history of the world. |
|
Didn't write the Bible, just obeys it
|
|
Posts: 6,639
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
|
Is it "the War On Terror" or "World War 4"? -
03-24-2013, 06:31 AM
The idea of terms like " islamofascism", " Fourth World War" and " World War 4" is to remind everybody that George W Bush, like every GOP leader, is the reincarnation (so to speak) of Winston Churchill, and that the war effort is so important that we have to make sacrifices, except where it's not.
The problem with this is that it reminds people that we survived ww2 without scrapping the constitution, or crushing children's testicles. Plus it brings back memories of anti-capitalist ideas like " shared sacrifice".
So what do we call the war? I'm partial to writing it as " World War ][ ][", pronounced " World War Two, Two". As in, the sequel to WW2. Only this time it's personal.
We must make some sacrifices for the war effort, like for example we have to give up the constitution. But no " excess profits taxes" like in WW2. Do your bit for the war effort by going to Disneyland. Sit down, shut up, go shopping.
Disagree? By failing to register and debate me, you prove that liberals are factless frauds who only persuade through intimidation. To prove otherwise, debate me!
Got Questions? See Frequently Asked Questions, or use Forum Search, tag system, or our guides on Geography, History, Science, Comparative Religion, Civics, and Current Events.
Did I use a new word you've never heard? Definitions here. | Vote! Everything you need to vote here!
Last edited by Jeb Stuart Thurmond; 04-03-2013 at 12:56 AM.
|
|
Unsaved trash, Arrogant Atheist Dick
|
|
Posts: 14,455
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: The other end of the internet
|
|
Re: Is it "the War On Terror" or "World War 4"? -
03-24-2013, 07:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeb Stuart Thurmond
...So what do we call the war? I'm partial to writing it as "World War ][ ][", pronounced "World War Two, Two"...
|
As Lyndon Johnson's "War on Poverty" was, well, I don't know how to describe what happened, I guess "abandoned" would work (and still allow you to maintain the dillusion that the USA has never lost a war), maybe borrowing (borrowing from a Democrat? lol, nah, "recycling", yeah, that's better, even makes it sound like you give a shit for "green" issues), ok, recycling the name, but with an "improvement" or extension to make it seem more focused (in effect it's the exact opposite, but insane war spending just boosts the economy, right? it's not like you're going to have to deal with the exploding national debt because the Rapture is sure to happen soon), and hey presto we now have the "War on Poverty Stricken People". That's the ticket.
And if they're not actually poverty stricken before the War starts, well, you just have to do something about that first (Free Market Fred is your go-to guy on that front, I'm sure he could handle it for a suitable fee), and then nothing's stopping you.
|
Fourm Member
Forum Member
|
|
Posts: 9,264
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: On my way to Paradise
|
|
Re: Is it "the War On Terror" or "World War 4"? -
03-24-2013, 07:47 AM
When did WWIII end?
|
|
Didn't write the Bible, just obeys it
|
|
Posts: 6,639
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
|
Re: Is it "the War On Terror" or "World War 4"? -
03-24-2013, 12:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BelieverInGod
When did WWIII end?
|
When Reagan won it. Watch the docudramas Rambo 3, Red Dawn, and Red Dawn.
Disagree? By failing to register and debate me, you prove that liberals are factless frauds who only persuade through intimidation. To prove otherwise, debate me!
Got Questions? See Frequently Asked Questions, or use Forum Search, tag system, or our guides on Geography, History, Science, Comparative Religion, Civics, and Current Events.
Did I use a new word you've never heard? Definitions here. | Vote! Everything you need to vote here!
|
|
Mayor of Freehold
|
|
Posts: 12,176
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: City Hall, Freehold, Iowa
|
|
Re: Is it "the War On Terror" or "World War 4"? -
03-24-2013, 03:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeb Stuart Thurmond
When Reagan won it. Watch the docudramas Rambo 3, Red Dawn, and Red Dawn.
|
A brilliant way to explain our present times, Brother Thurmond. We need to think of ourselves as being in a "Just War" like WWII.
We must fight to our rightous death against Satan and the socialist government of Obama. Yes!! WWII, WWII.
Isaiah 24:1-3 Behold, the LORD maketh the earth empty (2)...as the taker of usury, so with the giver of usury to him. (3) The land shall be utterly emptied, and utterly spoiled: for the LORD hath spoken his word.
|
|
Putting the "stud" back in Bible Study
|
|
Posts: 79,910
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Freehold, Iowa
|
|
Re: Is it "the War On Terror" or "World War 4"? -
03-24-2013, 05:25 PM
We have to think about reaching out to the youth. They like to say "v2" which I am led to believe means "version 2." What about WWIIv2?
Here is a partial list from just a few scripture verses:
Hypocrites (Matthew 24:51), The Unforgiving (Mark 11:26), Homosexuals (Romans 1:26, 27), Fornicators (Romans 1:29), The Wicked (Romans 1:29), The Covetous (Romans 1:29), The Malicious (Romans 1:29), The Envious (Romans 1:29), Murderers (Romans 1:29), The Deceitful (Romans 1:29), Backbiters (Romans 1:30), Haters of God (Romans 1:30), The Despiteful (Romans 1:30), The Proud (Romans 1:30), Boasters (Romans 1:30), Inventors of evil (Romans 1:30), Disobedient to parents (Romans 1:30), Covenant breakers (Romans 1:31), The Unmerciful (Romans 1:31), The Implacable (Romans 1:31), The Unrighteous (1Corinthians 6:9), Idolaters (1Corinthians 6:9), Adulterers (1Corinthians 6:9), The Effeminate (1Corinthians 6:9), Thieves (1Corinthians 6:10), Drunkards (1Corinthians 6:10), Reviler (1Corinthians 6:10), Extortioners (1Corinthians 6:10), The Fearful (Revelation 21:8), The Unbelieving (Revelation 21:8), The Abominable (Revelation 21:8), Whoremongers (Revelation 21:8), Sorcerers (Revelation 21:8), All Liars (Revelation 21:8)
|
Fourm Member
Forum Member
|
|
Posts: 9,264
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: On my way to Paradise
|
|
Re: Is it "the War On Terror" or "World War 4"? -
03-25-2013, 01:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeb Stuart Thurmond
When Reagan won it. Watch the docudramas Rambo 3, Red Dawn, and Red Dawn.
|
Ah, so the cold war was WWIII, okay, that makes more sense.
|
|
Unsaved trash, inbred retard
Under Investigation
|
|
Posts: 24
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: In bed with your wife
|
|
Re: Is it "the War On Terror" or "World War 4"? -
04-09-2013, 11:46 PM
Your human leaders never officially declared a war on the Soviet Union, therefore WWIII never occurred. Yes the name says war, but there was no conflict between the nations. The Cold War was simply an arms race.
|
|
Landover Security Superviser Asset Loss Prevention and Personal Security Expert NOT angry and positively NOT Gay
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 18,554
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Freehold Iowa
|
|
Re: Is it "the War On Terror" or "World War 4"? -
04-10-2013, 12:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gibbor
Your human leaders never officially declared a war on the Soviet Union, therefore WWIII never occurred. Yes the name says war, but there was no conflict between the nations. The Cold War was simply an arms race.
|
Quit trying to belittle REAL America's victory over socialism.
Time to reclaim our FREEDOM from the “Mullah in Chief” and his growing activist voter hoards of socialists, communists, anti-Semites, anti-Christians, atheists, radical gays and lesbians, feminists, illegal immigrants, Muslims, anti-Anglo whites and others.
Hot Must ReadThreads!
Time to come clean on Benghazi Mr Obama!
|
|
Forum Member
Forum Member
|
|
Posts: 206
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: In the fold of Saved Souls.
|
|
Re: Is it "the War On Terror" or "World War 4"? -
04-10-2013, 03:14 PM
It shall be a Holy War - where Christians defend the world from jihadists!
I Samuel 20:4
"Then said Jonathan unto David, Whatsoever thy soul desireth, I will even do it for thee."
This is not a reference of a homosexual relationship but a friendship of depth and platonic commitment! Why must liiebrals always make everything sound so DIRTY!?
|
|
Unsaved trash, inbred retard
Under Investigation
|
|
Posts: 24
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: In bed with your wife
|
|
Re: Is it "the War On Terror" or "World War 4"? -
04-11-2013, 01:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby-Joe
Quit trying to belittle REAL America's victory over socialism.
|
There was no "victory" against the Soviet Union during the Cold War. The Soviet Union's government crumbled out from under its structure. The people of the former Soviet Union chose democracy. No victory for America. Only peace.
A whip for the horse, a bridle for the ass, and a rod for the fool's back. Proverbs 26:3
|
|
Walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless.
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 15,223
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Thong-infested Florida©
|
|
Re: Is it "the War On Terror" or "World War 4"? -
04-11-2013, 01:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gibbon
There was no "victory" against the Soviet Union during the Cold War. The Soviet Union's government crumbled out from under its structure. The people of the former Soviet Union chose democracy. No victory for America. Only peace.
|
The Soviet Union crumbled because of the personal efforts of Ronald Reagan and you know it. To claim otherwise is disingenuous.
Even by your own definition, the USSR failed because it was trying to keep up with the Christian efforts of the Reagan Administration, but they failed because they are God-less commies.
YiC,
Zech
|
|
Completely CRAZY for the Lord
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 14,666
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Leviticus Landing
|
|
Re: Is it "the War On Terror" or "World War 4"? -
04-14-2013, 11:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gibbon
Your human leaders never officially declared a war on the Soviet Union, therefore WWIII never occurred. Yes the name says war, but there was no conflict between the nations. The Cold War was simply an arms race.
|
The "Allies" occupying Germany remained an occupying force until the "Allies" held a meeting withdrawing. That was known as the reunification of Germany and marks the end of WWII.
The ongoing struggle of communism however, originally an internal dispute among socialists from the camps of national socialism in Germany and Marxism in Russia, launched temporarily successful invasions, unconnected with WWII, into China, North Korea, Rhodesia and numerous other countries of that type. That offensive ended with the lease of Hong Kong and liberation has now reached China. This victory is celebrated in the art of Hu Ming, for example.
But no-one seemed to have informed the Kim dynasty, brainchild of soviet Russia and about to become a large scale example of therapeutic psychodrama.
|
Unsaved trash, unrepentant godmocker
Under Investigation
|
|
Posts: 9
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Godless Europistan
|
|
Re: Is it "the War On Terror" or "World War 4"? -
05-11-2013, 05:07 PM
Two nations staring each other out is hardly a war never mind a world war
|
|
Forum Member
Forum Member
|
|
Posts: 45
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Kazakhstan, Karaganda.
|
|
Re: Is it "the War On Terror" or "World War 4"? -
08-03-2013, 04:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zechariah Smyth
The Soviet Union crumbled because of the personal efforts of Ronald Reagan and you know it. To claim otherwise is disingenuous.
Even by your own definition, the USSR failed because it was trying to keep up with the Christian efforts of the Reagan Administration, but they failed because they are God-less commies.
YiC,
Zech
|
Zbigniew Brzezinski, Secretary of the Security Council of the United States:
"We destroyed the Soviet Union, and destroy Russia. The chances that you have no "
- This statement was winged in the West
For if the casting away of them (Jews) - reconciliation of the world, what will their acceptance be but life from the dead?
|
|
Didn't write the Bible, just obeys it
|
|
Posts: 6,639
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
|
Re: Is it "the War On Terror" or "World War 4"? -
08-03-2013, 06:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ruslan111
Zbigniew Brzezinski, Secretary of the Security Council of the United States:
"We destroyed the Soviet Union, and destroy Russia. The chances that you have no "
- This statement was winged in the West
|
I googled this and it just brought me back here. PS it's also total gibberish.
Disagree? By failing to register and debate me, you prove that liberals are factless frauds who only persuade through intimidation. To prove otherwise, debate me!
Got Questions? See Frequently Asked Questions, or use Forum Search, tag system, or our guides on Geography, History, Science, Comparative Religion, Civics, and Current Events.
Did I use a new word you've never heard? Definitions here. | Vote! Everything you need to vote here!
|
|
True Christian™
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 1,941
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: With Jesus
|
|
Re: Is it "the War On Terror" or "World War 4"? -
08-03-2013, 07:04 PM
Brzezinski said “ We destroyed the USSR, we will also destroy Russia.”
I don't understand the rest and have absolutely no idea what this means:
Quote:
This statement was winged in the West
|
The problem is with the meaning of "winged". Angels are winged, sometimes spelled wingèd. Men who are grazed by bullets are winged. Women's eyeliner that goes up in the outside corner is winged.
Hope that helps.
YiC
Attila's Wife
2 Timothy 3:16
All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
|
|
Didn't write the Bible, just obeys it
|
|
Posts: 6,639
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
|
Re: Is it "the War On Terror" or "World War 4"? -
08-03-2013, 10:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Attila's Wife
Brzezinski said “We destroyed the USSR, we will also destroy Russia.”
|
The quote shows up once on some swiss website and that's it. Anyway, those bunch of glorified polacks are so likely to destroy themselves they don't need our help.
Disagree? By failing to register and debate me, you prove that liberals are factless frauds who only persuade through intimidation. To prove otherwise, debate me!
Got Questions? See Frequently Asked Questions, or use Forum Search, tag system, or our guides on Geography, History, Science, Comparative Religion, Civics, and Current Events.
Did I use a new word you've never heard? Definitions here. | Vote! Everything you need to vote here!
|
|
True Christian™
|
|
Posts: 9,361
Join Date: Jan 2007
|
|
Re: Is it "the War On Terror" or "World War 4"? -
08-04-2013, 03:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Attila's Wife
Brzezinski said “ We destroyed the USSR, we will also destroy Russia.”
I don't understand the rest and have absolutely no idea what this means:
The problem is with the meaning of "winged". Angels are winged, sometimes spelled wingèd. Men who are grazed by bullets are winged. Women's eyeliner that goes up in the outside corner is winged.
Hope that helps.
YiC
Attila's Wife
|
I don't speak Kazakhstan, and had trouble understanding the movie "Borat", but when it comes to Zbigniew Brzezinski we know a little more. Brzezinski served as National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter from 1977 to 1981. His daughter, Mika Brzezinski, is co-host on MSNBC's (socialist propaganda) Morning Joe.
Zbigniew is from Poland (heavily burdened with cathyliks) and likes to take credit for taking down the USSR. It might be said that he caused some other problems with the mooselimbs.
Quote:
Zbigniew Brzezinski How the US provoked the Soviet Union into invading Afghanistan
First Published: Le Nouvel Observateur (France), Jan 15-21, 1998, p. 76
Translated from the French by William Blum
Question: The former director of the CIA, Robert Gates, stated in his memoirs (From the Shadows), that American intelligence services began to aid the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan six months before the Soviet intervention. In this period you were the national security adviser to President Carter. You therefore played a role in this affair. Is that correct?
Brzezinski: Yes. According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the reality, closely guarded until now, is completely otherwise: Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention.
Question: Despite this risk, you were an advocate of this covert action. But perhaps you yourself desired this Soviet entry into war and looked to provoke it?
Brzezinski: It isn't quite that. We didn't push the Russians to intervene, but we knowingly increased the probability that they would.
Question: When the Soviets justified their intervention by asserting that they intended to fight against secret involvement of the United States in Afghanistan, people didn't believe them. However, there was a basis of truth. You don't regret anything today?
Brzezinski: Regret what? That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you want me to regret it? The day that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote to President Carter, in substance: We now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam war. Indeed, for almost 10 years, Moscow had to carry on a war unsupportable by the government, a conflict that brought about the demoralization and finally the breakup of the Soviet empire.
Question: And neither do you regret having supported the Islamic fundamentalists, having given arms and advice to future terrorists?
Brzezinski: What is most important to the history of the world? The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some stirred-up Moslems or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?
Question: Some stirred-up Moslems? But it has been said and repeated: Islamic fundamentalism represents a world menace today.
Brzezinski: Nonsense! It is said that the West had a global policy in regard to Islam. That is stupid. There isn't a global Islam. Look at Islam in a rational manner and without demagoguery or emotion. It is the leading religion of the world with 1.5 billion followers. But what is there in common among Saudi Arabian fundamentalism, moderate Morocco, Pakistan militarism, Egyptian pro-Western or Central Asian secularism? Nothing more than what unites the Christian countries.
…
http://www.informationclearinghouse....rticle7323.htm
|
Hell's foundations quiver at the shout of praise;
brothers, lift your voices, loud your anthems raise.
...and get off my lawn
|
|
Putting the "stud" back in Bible Study
|
|
Posts: 79,910
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Freehold, Iowa
|
|
Re: Is it "the War On Terror" or "World War 4"? -
08-04-2013, 03:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by WilliamJenningsBryan
I don't speak Kazakhstan, and had trouble understanding the movie "Borat", but when it comes to Zbigniew Brzezinski we know a little more. Brzezinski served as National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter from 1977 to 1981. His daughter, Mika Brzezinski, is co-host on MSNBC's (socialist propaganda) Morning Joe.
Zbigniew is from Poland (heavily burdened with cathyliks) and likes to take credit for taking down the USSR. It might be said that he caused some other problems with the mooselimbs.
|
Leave it to that rabid communist Jimmy Carter to try and steal from Ronald Reagan's resume!
Here is a partial list from just a few scripture verses:
Hypocrites (Matthew 24:51), The Unforgiving (Mark 11:26), Homosexuals (Romans 1:26, 27), Fornicators (Romans 1:29), The Wicked (Romans 1:29), The Covetous (Romans 1:29), The Malicious (Romans 1:29), The Envious (Romans 1:29), Murderers (Romans 1:29), The Deceitful (Romans 1:29), Backbiters (Romans 1:30), Haters of God (Romans 1:30), The Despiteful (Romans 1:30), The Proud (Romans 1:30), Boasters (Romans 1:30), Inventors of evil (Romans 1:30), Disobedient to parents (Romans 1:30), Covenant breakers (Romans 1:31), The Unmerciful (Romans 1:31), The Implacable (Romans 1:31), The Unrighteous (1Corinthians 6:9), Idolaters (1Corinthians 6:9), Adulterers (1Corinthians 6:9), The Effeminate (1Corinthians 6:9), Thieves (1Corinthians 6:10), Drunkards (1Corinthians 6:10), Reviler (1Corinthians 6:10), Extortioners (1Corinthians 6:10), The Fearful (Revelation 21:8), The Unbelieving (Revelation 21:8), The Abominable (Revelation 21:8), Whoremongers (Revelation 21:8), Sorcerers (Revelation 21:8), All Liars (Revelation 21:8)
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Powered by Jesus - vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com
Content Landover Baptist Forums © 1620, 2022 all rights reserved
|