[Atheism is logic]

Originally Posted by Mary Etheldreda

There's no explaining the kind of conspiracy theories atheopaths come up with, dear. It simply doesn't make sense. They are so wrapped up in being angry and satisfying unquenchable lust for doing gay stuff that they simply cannot see the Truth© staring them right in the face. It would be sad and pathetic if they weren't so militant and destructive to the rest of society.

conspiracy theories plural of con·spir·a·cy the·o·ry

Noun
A belief that some covert but influential organization is responsible for an unexplained event.

how is it a conspiracy theory? first of all it is NOT a belief it is fact because those bible verses contradict each other and you can not explain it. then you say that pointing out the contradictions somehow makes you homosexual?

[Atheism is logic]

Originally Posted by Redeemed Papist

You atheists are all the same. You just hate God because you know deep down you're going to burn forever so you want us all to join you. You can't stand the thought that anyone could rise above the desire to stick things in his bottom and love Jesus back for His temporary death.

Well we can see what's real when we read the Bible and we want people to read it also and see what we see about God. Is that so bad? :thumbsup:

where in the bible does it say i can't stick stuff up my butt and why did god give me that desire(don't have tat because im not gay)

and no i don't believe in hell because it is not logical and a horrible thing if god is real then he is a REDACTEDsending innocent children to hell is more than a dick not even describable but makes him SUPER REDACTED

why did it take god until the second testament to mention hell?

(yeah oh by the way if you don't believe in me you go to hell i probably should of old you a few thousand years before but ya know oh well)

[Dr Laurence Niles]

Originally Posted by Atheism is logic

conspiracy theories plural of con·spir·a·cy the·o·ry

Noun
A belief that some covert but influential organization is responsible for an unexplained event.

how is it a conspiracy theory? first of all it is NOT a belief it is fact because those bible verses contradict each other and you can not explain it. then you say that pointing out the contradictions somehow makes you homosexual?

If you can't see why the gaywise hate God you can't see the woods for the tree .

Being a dirty queer is the biggest contraction: contradiction of God's law! Zing!

Lev 20:13 13 If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

YIC

[Atheism is logic]

Originally Posted by Dr Laurence Niles

If you can't see why the gaywise hate God you can't see the woods for the tree .

Being a dirty queer is the biggest contraction: contradiction of God's law! Zing!

Lev 20:13 13 If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.

YIC

again you assume that you have to be gay to not believe in god what i was saying is that the site below this is not conspiracy these are factual contradictions within the bible and so far i have only been presented with gay slander against me as to why they somehow can't contradict eachother.4

<<< danish Porn Link Removed - Admin >>>

[Atheism is logic]

furthermore being "gay" is not a sin anywhere in the while acting on gay impulses is a sin not just being gay. so your move christians.

all im saying is the only evidence you have that the bible is the word of god is that someone told you that. and THATS ALL THE EVIDENCE YOU HAVE!!!!



now you guys are just laughable you think biblical contradictions are porn


IT WAS "WRITTEN BY GOD" ARE YOU SAYING GOD MADE PORN

HAHAHAHA

<<< danish gay Porn Link Removed - Admin >>>

this is not porn these are a lists of sex contradictions and if you take away for that then you have truly lost any argument for your faith

[James Hutchins]

Originally Posted by Atheism is logic

furthermore being "gay" is not a sin anywhere in the while acting on gay impulses is a sin not just being gay. so your move christians.

all im saying is the only evidence you have that the bible is the word of god is that someone told you that. and THATS ALL THE EVIDENCE YOU HAVE!!!!



now you guys are just laughable you think biblical contradictions are porn


IT WAS "WRITTEN BY GOD" ARE YOU SAYING GOD MADE PORN

HAHAHAHA

<<< danish gay Porn Link Removed - Admin >>>

this is not porn these are a lists of sex contradictions and if you take away for that then you have truly lost any argument for your faith

Friend, you cannot lure decent people into having 'cybersex'. It will not happen. The DoF is onto you.

Further more, we do not argue, we praise God. You are just upset you cannot con the faithful.

[PraiseHawking]

In response to the first four reasons:
1) You claim the Bible is true because God wrote it, and God is right because the Bible says so. This kind of circular justification is ridiculous. Surely, by this logic, if I publish a book which says I am god and this is true because I said so then no one can argue it.

2) The only monkeys that evolved were the ones that did to so they could survive. Some monkeys never had to so they remained monkeys. That's simple biology.

3) We don't know how the Big Bang happened but we have narrowed it down to a singularity. We can't work out what it is. However, if god created the Big Bang, where did God come from. If God can be eternal then so can the universe.

4) Show me a quote directly mentioning dinosaurs in the Bible.

[MitzaLizalor]

Originally Posted by PraiseHawking

3) We don't know how the Big Bang happened but we have narrowed it down to a singularity.

Maths please. You can make an introductory post here

[PraiseHawking]

What do you mean by maths? Do you want me to provide the evidence behind the singularity?

[Pim Pendergast]

Originally Posted by PraiseHawking

What do you mean by maths? Do you want me to provide the evidence behind the singularity?

That would be a good start. An assertion is not evidence. But as Sister Mitza said, you should introduce yourself to us properly.

[PraiseHawking]

Okay, so scientists have been able to identify how the universe began to within 1/10 of a second from when it happened. What we have found is expansion. This supports the idea that a small space containing all that would be in the universe expanded quickly, causing the Big Bang. They have also used the red shift detected from stars to show that the universe is still expanding, which supports the idea of expansion.

[Pim Pendergast]

Originally Posted by PraiseHawking

Okay, so scientists have been able to identify how the universe began to within 1/10 of a second from when it happened. What we have found is expansion. This supports the idea that a small space containing all that would be in the universe expanded quickly, causing the Big Bang. They have also used the red shift detected from stars to show that the universe is still expanding, which supports the idea of expansion.

Atheist?

If not, tell us what church you go to, your favorite Bible verse, and how you came to faith in Christ.

[PraiseHawking]

Yes I am an Athiest. I though that would be obvious from my posts.

[Dr Laurence Niles]

Originally Posted by PraiseHawking

Yes I am an Athiest. I though that would be obvious from my posts.

As a self identified atheist you are just proving that your a priori assumption that there is no God is the fundamental problem here.

You are trying to prove that the universe isn't made by God and any fool knows you can't prove a negative; it does not matter how many set squares or white coats you own.

YIC

[PraiseHawking]

I assume that this is based of the ideas of James Randi, but didn't he also state that people claiming the existence of something must give evidence as well. Please provide your evidence.

By the way, don't use the Bible because using something that is circularly justified is not real evidence.

[Mary Etheldreda]

Hello and welcome to our friendly forums. You can read all kinds of helpful information ON THIS THREAD for newcomers like yourself. If you’d like to share your opinion, kindly provide the Scriptural Support where we can see how wonderfully God said it first. Your rights on our forum can be found HERE. And finally please refrain from such ad hominem attacks as comparing a decent, God-fearing True Christian™ to an atheist clown-for-hire like James Randi. It not only makes you look like a greater fool, but it prevents you from opening your mind and seeing the Truth©. Thank you.

[Dr Laurence Niles]

Originally Posted by PraiseHawking

I assume that this is based of the ideas of James Randi, but didn't he also state that people claiming the existence of something must give evidence as well. Please provide your evidence.

By the way, don't use the Bible because using something that is circularly justified is not real evidence.

No it is based on the scientific method and a philosophical positivism.

But you would need a higher eduction to realise that.

YIC

[PraiseHawking]

=scientific method and a philosophical positivism.

Please explain to me the scientific method that proves the Bible.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Originally Posted by PraiseHawking

Please explain to me the scientific method that proves the Bible.

[MitzaLizalor]

How's the introductory post coming along? It doesn't have to be a very good post. At first my posts were all weird because I had only used the one browser and then it crashed or something so I had to use a different browser or I was on a different computer or I can't remember now but anyway, I saw all these peculiar fonts and all different sized text and thought "who's this crackpot?" and then saw it was me because the other browser didn't recognise ¾ of what the other other one did but you are having a different problem viz:

Originally Posted by PraiseHawking

In response to the first four reasons:
1) You claim the Bible is true because God wrote it, and God is right because the Bible says so. This kind of circular justification is ridiculous. Surely, by this logic, if I publish a book which says I am god and this is true because I said so then no one can argue it.

2) The only monkeys that evolved were the ones that did to so they could survive. Some monkeys never had to so they remained monkeys. That's simple biology.

3) We don't know how the Big Bang happened but we have narrowed it down to a singularity. We can't work out what it is. However, if god created the Big Bang, where did God come from. If God can be eternal then so can the universe.

4) Show me a quote directly mentioning dinosaurs in the Bible.

1) You seem to be having things all mixed up. God is all powerful because, with respect to the universe He created, He is greater than the sum total of its constituent parts. Since "universe" signifies that of which there is only one i.e. everything that exists whether we can observe it or not (which means that your dopey "multiverse" models collapse because however many of them there may be they still fall within the category "everything that exists whether we can observe it or not" I could demonstrate that using set theory, it's pretty basic really). Therefore when God speaks (He uses the Imperative mood incidentally) what He says may be relied on. If it were not so the universe would not exist. As you can see, there is no begging the question going on here.

Based on what you've posted so far, I probably wouldn't read one of your books much beyond the subtitle. The veracity of what you claimed in its pages is a question that would never arise.

In response to the first four reasons:
1) You claim the Bible is true because God wrote it, and God is right because the Bible says so. This kind of circular justification is ridiculous. Surely, by this logic, if I publish a book which says I am god and this is true because I said so then no one can argue it.

2) The only monkeys that evolved were the ones that did to so they could survive. Some monkeys never had to so they remained monkeys. That's simple biology.

3) We don't know how the Big Bang happened but we have narrowed it down to a singularity. We can't work out what it is. However, if god created the Big Bang, where did God come from. If God can be eternal then so can the universe.

4) Show me a quote directly mentioning dinosaurs in the Bible.

2) Simple biology. Well what you have here is not biology at all. It is simple however. Your pope, Richard Dawkins, frequently addresses exactly the error you hiss. Just because some nutter has this theory how worms turn into Chinese hairless dogs (which is obviously ridiculous) does not mean we have not understood what the "theory" actually claims. Normally it's discussed at junior school level. Perhaps you missed that day?

It is because we understand what maniacs (such as the Dawkins) have to say that we are able to discern their error. Yes, at school there are young and impressionable minds for the Godless science of atheism to warp and corrupt. Their ignorance is exploited. But the full grown evolutionary biologist has no such excuse. His aim is to destroy God's Plan to remove the disgusting sin that brims in each newborn baby so that it and all its siblings will never hear The Gospel winding up in HELL FOREVER.

In response to the first four reasons:
1) You claim the Bible is true because God wrote it, and God is right because the Bible says so. This kind of circular justification is ridiculous. Surely, by this logic, if I publish a book which says I am god and this is true because I said so then no one can argue it.

2) The only monkeys that evolved were the ones that did to so they could survive. Some monkeys never had to so they remained monkeys. That's simple biology.

3) We don't know how the Big Bang happened but we have narrowed it down to a singularity. We can't work out what it is. However, if god created the Big Bang, where did God come from. If God can be eternal then so can the universe.

4) Show me a quote directly mentioning dinosaurs in the Bible.

3) Singularity. Originally what masquerades as "physics" these days came under the umbrella of alchemy but even so, some elements of the subject remain in Valence Bond Theory which you must have been taught at some stage if you're interested in chemistry. Again, without understanding these satanic lies it would be impossible for us to point out how they contradict Scripture which, as has already been demonstrated, is The Inerrant Word of God. According to nitwits such as Sam Harris, who addresses this point frequently, the whole point of your "singularity" is that it must be causeless. The maths would be needed to describe its location. If there were a singularity, where was it?

In response to the first four reasons:
1) You claim the Bible is true because God wrote it, and God is right because the Bible says so. This kind of circular justification is ridiculous. Surely, by this logic, if I publish a book which says I am god and this is true because I said so then no one can argue it.

2) The only monkeys that evolved were the ones that did to so they could survive. Some monkeys never had to so they remained monkeys. That's simple biology.

3) We don't know how the Big Bang happened but we have narrowed it down to a singularity. We can't work out what it is. However, if god created the Big Bang, where did God come from. If God can be eternal then so can the universe.

4) Show me a quote directly mentioning dinosaurs in the Bible.

4) Job 40 . picture . etymology