There's A Good Reason "Papist" Rhymes With "Rapist!" -
01-01-2011, 03:31 PM
With the continuing exposure of more and more sex abuse scandals of crimes committed by catholick priests, I thought I would look up some actual numbers. Wikidpedia notes that in the U.S. alone (which contains only 6% of the world's catlickers) there have been about 11,000 reported cases of abuse between 1950 and 2002. Of these, only 6,700 were investigated and substantiated against 1,800 priests. This means that each papist ring-kissing priest was diddling about 3.7 innocent children each. And this is JUST in the US!
Why is it that the catholic cult lends itself so easily to these orgies of pedophilia that go unpunished?
I found a good summation which I will paraphrase:
The most crucial problem with the pope-followers is its belief that faith alone in Christ is not sufficient for salvation. The Bible clearly and consistently states that receiving Jesus Christ as Savior, by grace through faith, grants salvation (John 1:12; 3:16,18,36; Acts 16:31; Romans 10:9-10,13; Ephesians 2:8-9). The catlickers rejects this. The official position of the "Roman Catholic Church" is that a person must believe in Jesus Christ AND be baptized AND receive the Eucharist along with the other sacraments AND obey the decrees of the "Roman Catholic Church" AND perform meritorious works AND not die with any mortal sins AND etc., etc., etc. Catholic divergence from the Bible on this most crucial of issues, salvation, means that yes, Catholicism is a false religion. If a person believes what the Catholic Church officially teaches, he/she will NOT be saved. Any claim that works or rituals must be added to faith in order for salvation to be achieved is a claim that Jesus’ death was not sufficient to fully purchase our salvation! HERESY!
It is because the very CORE of the catholic faith is based on lies and deception about the teaching of Jesus that everything they touch becomes poisoned. Want proof? have you ever heard of a True Christian pastor abusing his position of power? I didn't think so.
|