[Wide-Open]

Originally Posted by just Jimi

To come back at the original subject,
if the earth would be flat, then how did Steve Fosset (and all the others) fly around the world?

Do you realise that he somewhat got lost? And is presumed to have keeled over? Snuffed it? Is no longer amongst us?

If the earth is round, where is he know? Tell me, oh smart one.

He's fallen away, that's what. Go past the corners, and you fall off. Finito.

Amen.

BTW, you're not a Limburger are you? I know you like your Steves and all that, but there are limits.

[Stridex Puss Bucket]

gravity on earth is weak
it cannot bend light, for gravity on earth is nothing like a black hole
The 4 corners are obvously the North and south pole, the other two are in the Holy land, and somewhere in Texas (or maybe California I don't remember which one)

[Ahimaaz Smith]

Originally Posted by just Jimi

To come back at the original subject,
if the earth would be flat, then how did Steve Fosset (and all the others) fly around the world? Did they went to one side of the earth and then suddenly appeared on the other side of the planet?

Does anybody bother reading the whole thread before posting anymore? We have explained this now about 16 different times.

The Earth is flat, but it does rotate once per day around the Central Pole (much like a record player or a potter's wheel rotating). This rotation causes a coriolis force that gently pushes boats, airplanes, etc. around in a circle, so that it appears to those who are unfamiliar with the physics involved that they have traversed a globe.

If you don't believe me, take a ruler to a map of the world and draw a straight line between New York and London. It goes out over the ocean, never coming close to Canada or Greenland:




Yet here is the actual path that planes take between these two cities, which passes over parts of Canada and close enough to Greenland to spot the ice pack (which, BTW, looks pretty intact to me, contrary to the Al Gore propaganda line):



Why the difference? As Dr. Ville has described in his excellent 24 volume monograph, Creation Science At The Crossroads: Biblical Geography In The Transportation Industry, they need to fly farther north than a direct route to correct for the coriolis force.

Now, you're probably thinking, if the Earth rotates like this once per day around the Central Pole, why don't we see the Sun, the Moon, and the stars moving in a circle in the sky? The answer is simple--the Firmament of the Heavens is attached to the Earth by fixed pillars, so when the Earth rotates, the sky rotates with it. And, if you go far enough north or south, you actually do see the Sun complete a daily circle around the sky during the summer months.

Maybe you should go check it out yourself? Just get in your car, boat, plane or whatever and just keep going in one direction. Maybe you will fall of the earth

As I've just explained, that won't happen. The closer you get to the edge, the more foreceful is the coriolis force, so, no matter how hard you try, you cannot actually reach the edge--unless, like Steve Fawcett, you are there trying to prove the Bible wrong. God does not like to be mocked, and he has been known to let an unbeliever or two fall off the edge (landing in Hell, where the unbeliever dies immediately on impact, heads up to Heaven for the Final Judgement, then goes right back down to Hell).

And yes, I have been on airplanes between New York and London, and, sure enough, you fly as much north-south as you do east-west, just as predicted by Dr. Ville's theory.

Originally Posted by Deus Ex Machina

gravity on earth is weak
it cannot bend light, for gravity on earth is nothing like a black hole

The coriolis force applies to light, just the way it applies to airplanes and boats--but, because the strength of the coriolis force is proportional to the velocity of the object, light gets bent far beyond what Einstein ever could have imagined when you get close to the edge of the World.

The 4 corners are obvously the North and south pole, the other two are in the Holy land, and somewhere in Texas (or maybe California I don't remember which one)

The Central Pole is in the mid-Atlantic. Nobody really knows where the four corners are exactly, since, being the farthest points from the Central Pole, they are the hardest to reach. Although I like your idea that one corner is in the Holy Land, I can assure you that I have explored every street in Freehold, Iowa (collecting evidence for successful lawsuit against Mapquest et al. to have Freehold, whose location is copyrighted, removed from their maps, unless they paid a substantial royalty; so far, they have refused to fork over the cash), and there is no corner of the Earth anywhere to be seen around here.

[Sommanol Beatmeup]

[just Jimi]

Originally Posted by Ahimaaz Smith

Does anybody bother reading the whole thread before posting anymore? We have explained this now about 16 different times.

The Earth is flat, but it does rotate once per day around the Central Pole (much like a record player or a potter's wheel rotating). This rotation causes a coriolis force that gently pushes boats, airplanes, etc. around in a circle, so that it appears to those who are unfamiliar with the physics involved that they have traversed a globe.

Do you actually believe the crap you are saying?
and I thought there couldn't be such mormons.....
aai feel soow sorry for you

[Kerplunki Zerplopski]

Originally Posted by Ahimaaz Smith

Does anybody bother reading the whole thread before posting anymore? We have explained this now about 16 different times.

The Earth is flat, but it does rotate once per day around the Central Pole (much like a record player or a potter's wheel rotating). This rotation causes a coriolis force that gently pushes boats, airplanes, etc. around in a circle, so that it appears to those who are unfamiliar with the physics involved that they have traversed a globe.

If you don't believe me, take a ruler to a map of the world and draw a straight line between New York and London. It goes out over the ocean, never coming close to Canada or Greenland:




Yet here is the actual path that planes take between these two cities, which passes over parts of Canada and close enough to Greenland to spot the ice pack (which, BTW, looks pretty intact to me, contrary to the Al Gore propaganda line):



Why the difference? As Dr. Ville has described in his excellent 24 volume monograph, Creation Science At The Crossroads: Biblical Geography In The Transportation Industry, they need to fly farther north than a direct route to correct for the coriolis force.

Now, you're probably thinking, if the Earth rotates like this once per day around the Central Pole, why don't we see the Sun, the Moon, and the stars moving in a circle in the sky? The answer is simple--the Firmament of the Heavens is attached to the Earth by fixed pillars, so when the Earth rotates, the sky rotates with it. And, if you go far enough north or south, you actually do see the Sun complete a daily circle around the sky during the summer months.

As I've just explained, that won't happen. The closer you get to the edge, the more foreceful is the coriolis force, so, no matter how hard you try, you cannot actually reach the edge--unless, like Steve Fawcett, you are there trying to prove the Bible wrong. God does not like to be mocked, and he has been known to let an unbeliever or two fall off the edge (landing in Hell, where the unbeliever dies immediately on impact, heads up to Heaven for the Final Judgement, then goes right back down to Hell).

And yes, I have been on airplanes between New York and London, and, sure enough, you fly as much north-south as you do east-west, just as predicted by Dr. Ville's theory.

The coriolis force applies to light, just the way it applies to airplanes and boats--but, because the strength of the coriolis force is proportional to the velocity of the object, light gets bent far beyond what Einstein ever could have imagined when you get close to the edge of the World.

The Central Pole is in the mid-Atlantic. Nobody really knows where the four corners are exactly, since, being the farthest points from the Central Pole, they are the hardest to reach. Although I like your idea that one corner is in the Holy Land, I can assure you that I have explored every street in Freehold, Iowa (collecting evidence for successful lawsuit against Mapquest et al. to have Freehold, whose location is copyrighted, removed from their maps, unless they paid a substantial royalty; so far, they have refused to fork over the cash), and there is no corner of the Earth anywhere to be seen around here.

okay... so what you're saying is that flying from America to say.. Japan or China without first crossing the whole of the planet?

then... how did all those people travel between those countries in less than a day?

[F. Nietzsche]

Originally Posted by Bobby-Joe

How would it be dark if the earth was round friend? Light bends from gravity so the light would bend around a round earth making day all the time.

Right now it is currently 1:15 AM in Weimar, Germany, where I live. If in fact the earth was flat, the entire world would have more or less the same day/night cycle, not to mention the same overall view of the night sky, which is completely wrong.

Travel several hundred miles south and the position of Polaris shifts towards the horizon, until once the Equator is crossed, it ceases to be visible. Explain to me again how such a thing can take place in a flat earth with roughly the same plane of reference for all points on said disc (which I assume is the model you have of it.)?

The simple fact is, there is more which can be done with optics and simple observation which can show the curvature of the Earth than several NASA photographs.

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Originally Posted by Sommanol Beatmeup

stop derailing a very good thread - all anyone can see is some circles and a big fat arrow and your word "BELGIUM" This is not proof!

There's nothing there - and even if you had been a bit more careful, I rather think the mythical Kingdom of The Belgs was much further south and east. Goodness! How many times do you have to be told!

Enough! On with the Godly thread.

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Originally Posted by F. Nietzsche

Right now it is currently 1:15 AM in Weimar, Germany, where I live. If in fact the earth was flat, the entire world would have more or less the same day/night cycle, not to mention the same overall view of the night sky, which is completely wrong.

Travel several hundred miles south and the position of Polaris shifts towards the horizon, until once the Equator is crossed, it ceases to be visible. Explain to me again how such a thing can take place in a flat earth with roughly the same plane of reference for all points on said disc (which I assume is the model you have of it.)?

The simple fact is, there is more which can be done with optics and simple observation which can show the curvature of the Earth than several NASA photographs.

Fisheye lenses friend - everything looks spherical.

[Kerplunki Zerplopski]

what about the difference in time? (Solar time that is, not general time)

if the earth was flat, every country in the world would have the Exact same time at exactly the same moment!

[Ahimaaz Smith]

Originally Posted by Kerplunki Zerplopski

then... how did all those people travel between those countries in less than a day?

The key is that the distance you measure when you fly between cities, and the actual distances, are different, because of the coriolis effect. I provided a reference to Dr. Ville's study in which he sets out the real location of every major city on the Earth, with a formula showing apparent distances after considering the coriolis effect. You will find that it is in full accord with published airline schedules, etc. worldwide. I don't really have anything to add to the perfectly lucid explanation you will find there.

Originally Posted by F. Nietzsche

If in fact the earth was flat, the entire world would have more or less the same day/night cycle, not to mention the same overall view of the night sky, which is completely wrong.

That's not at all true. Why do you think that a flat Earth has to have the day/night cycle in phase everywhere?

Travel several hundred miles south and the position of Polaris shifts towards the horizon, until once the Equator is crossed, it ceases to be visible. Explain to me again how such a thing can take place in a flat earth with roughly the same plane of reference for all points on said disc (which I assume is the model you have of it.)?

The stars are only 40 or 50 miles away, in the firmament of heaven. So why wouldn't the angles change when you move hundreds of miles?

Originally Posted by Kerplunki Zerplopski

if the earth was flat, every country in the world would have the Exact same time at exactly the same moment!

Why can't a flat Earth have different times in different places?

There places in Western Texas on Central Time that are farther West than places in Nebraska that are on Mountain Time. Time in a particular places is a human-imposed convention.

[F. Nietzsche]

Originally Posted by Ahimaaz Smith

That's not at all true. Why do you think that a flat Earth has to have the day/night cycle in phase everywhere?

Simple. Time differentials are caused by different geographic areas having different times of sunrise and sunset. While time zones as imposed by man are in fact arbitrary, there is difference between the hour of sunrise in say, Los Angeles, from London, which can be measured in hours. In a flat Earth, sunrise would happen at one consistent time for the entire planet from Seattle to Nairobi, rather than at staggered measured intervals as we observe. A spherical Earth solves this problem perfectly, as the Earth rotates, portions of the planet leave view of the sun as others enter it, something a Flat Earth cannot.

The stars are only 40 or 50 miles away, in the firmament of heaven. So why wouldn't the angles change when you move hundreds of miles?

Simple geometry really. The plane of the earth in this case is a continous reference point facing a fixed object, while the angle does change and the hypotenuse of the triangle becomes increasingly lengthened, the object itself remains in full view even at the edges of this planar disc. Of course, since polaris ceases to be observable beyond the equator, and for that matter, the constellations of the southern hemisphere are equally inobservable from the Northern Hemisphere, that is an effective indication that the Earth cannot be anything other than curved.

Why can't a flat Earth have different times in different places?

There places in Western Texas on Central Time that are farther West than places in Nebraska that are on Mountain Time. Time in a particular places is a human-imposed convention.

Yes, the hours of the day and time zones are arbitrary, but there is a measurable differential in the time of sunrise on the East Coast of the United States and in Europe. If you feel unsure using seconds and minutes to do the job, use some natural constant, there is a measureable difference between the overall position in the day/night cycle in Greece or the United States.

A flat earth cannot do this because if it was in fact flat, every single point on earth would in fact be in view of the sun whenever one point was.

Of course, from this point, I could go on to say how a planar disc the size and mass of the Earth is physically impossible due to the effect of gravity on objects the size of Earth, but that would involve a large amount of mathematics which I don't feel like diving into.

[Ahimaaz Smith]

Originally Posted by F. Nietzsche

Simple. Time differentials are caused by different geographic areas having different times of sunrise and sunset.

I think I see the problem here. You are assuming that day and night are caused by presence and absence of the Sun. Nothing could be further from the truth. God created light and darkness on the First Day of Creation:

And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness. And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day. Genesis 1:3-5

The Sun was not created until the Fourth Day:

And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years: And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so. And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also. And God put them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth, And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and God saw that it was good. And the evening and the morning were the fourth day. 1 Genesis 14-19

So the position of the Sun follows the day, not the other way around. Now, since the Sun is only about 50 miles above the Earth in the Firmament of Heaven, naturally it gets dimmer as it moves across the face of the Earth following the Day. What appears to you to be a sunset is really a combination of (a) the Sun moving farther away, (b) the atmospheric bending of light to make it appear that the Sun is setting, when it is really only moving away, and (c) the onset of Night, which is dark. If it were not Night, then you would still be able to see the Sun, albeit at a very small angle and very far away. But, since it is Night, it is dark, so you can't see the Sun at all.

In a flat Earth, sunrise would happen at one consistent time for the entire planet from Seattle to Nairobi, rather than at staggered measured intervals as we observe.

I think you are assuming that the Sun is millions of miles away. Recalculate based on the Sun being much closer to Earth, and add in the refractive index of the atmosphere, and you will find that the Sun indeed does appear at different times in different parts of the world.

Of course, since polaris ceases to be observable beyond the equator, and for that matter, the constellations of the southern hemisphere are equally inobservable from the Northern Hemisphere, that is an effective indication that the Earth cannot be anything other than curved.

Please don't slip the words "of course" into a scientific discussion. If you have a point to make, make it, but it's really not fair to everyone else for you to use rhetorical flourishes like "of course" to make statements for which you have no supporting evidence.

The reason you can't see Polaris from south of the "equator" is that it is too far away. It's just like if you stood on the top of Pike's Peak and looked for a single Christmas tree light in Denver--there's no problem with the line of sight, but the light is too dim, so you can't see it.

Yes, the hours of the day and time zones are arbitrary, but there is a measurable differential in the time of sunrise on the East Coast of the United States and in Europe. If you feel unsure using seconds and minutes to do the job, use some natural constant, there is a measureable difference between the overall position in the day/night cycle in Greece or the United States.

I never disputed that.

Of course, from this point, I could go on to say how a planar disc the size and mass of the Earth is physically impossible due to the effect of gravity on objects the size of Earth, but that would involve a large amount of mathematics which I don't feel like diving into.

If you don't want to present your evidence, that's fine, but saying "I don't fell like giving you my evidence" is not science, it's just a cop out. You strike me as someone who actually has a brain, unlike, say, Peter, who just pulls the "science" out of his a$$, so I'm happy to delve into it as deeply as you'd like.

Also, you need to be careful what views you attribute to True Christians™. We do not believe that the Earth is a planar disk, exactly. The Earth is certainly a circle:

It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in. Isaiah 40:22

It is a most unusual circle, however, since it has four corners:

And he shall set up an ensign for the nations, and shall assemble the outcasts of Israel, and gather together the dispersed of Judah from the four corners of the earth. Isaiah 11:12

Truly wonderous is the power of God to have fashioned such a shape!

Of course, I can't tell you where your error is without the benefit of seeing the math, but I suspect that you are making some untenable assumptions about the mass of the Earth--the best calculations from Creation Scientists put it as a square about 20-30 miles thick. In addition, the undersupport is made of adamantine, the same material as that which makes up that the pillars that hold the Heavens up above the Earth (we know this from studying the way earthquake waves bounce off the bottom). No way would that configuration be pulled into a ball by the force of gravity, it's both too stiff and insufficiently massive.

[Peter]

If the Earth has four "corners" acoording to your book, how are you so sure that it's flat, and not a tetrahedron?

The earth is a sphere, have you never seen the pictures of the earth made by satelites? Gravity would be messed up to if the earth would be flat.

[Bobby-Joe]

Originally Posted by Peter

If the Earth has four "corners" acoording to your book, how are you so sure that it's flat, and not a tetrahedron?

The earth is a sphere, have you never seen the pictures of the earth made by satelites? Gravity would be messed up to if the earth would be flat.

It's flat like a coin, "disk" is the word used in Isaiah. A disk also solves the whole gravity issue.

[Kerplunki Zerplopski]

No it doesn't... the laws of Gravity direct that any object in space will form into a globe-like object if it has enough mass (and the Earth does!)

[Jonesy]

Originally Posted by Ahimaaz Smith

Hmmm, the first computer was ENIAC, which was completed in 1946. The first so-called satellite was Sputnik, which launched in 1957. So how exactly did they take those pictures that show that the Earth was Round before 1946?

Yes i'm sure that you could alter pictures in 1946. People could still take photos of other planets before 1946.

[just Jimi]

Originally Posted by just Jimi

Do you actually believe the crap you are saying?
and I thought there couldn't be such mormons.....
aai feel soow sorry for you

I said mormons and not mormons!
Thou shall not change words of other people!!

[Peter]

I never said that those photos were taken before 1946, but I think that doesn't matter right now. The Earth isn't flat or a tetrahedron, but it's round. (What would be on the other side according to you, and what would keep humans from falling of?)

[Peter]

I must say I find your contradictions quite amusing:
loe and behold! The topic where you al say the Earth is round:
http://www.landoverbaptist.net/showthread.php?t=5007