<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>The Landover Baptist Church Forum - Creation Science</title>
		<link>https://www.landoverbaptist.net/</link>
		<description>The origins of life and the earth from a creationist (Biblical) perspective.</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2026 02:00:26 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>When they named God, was oral sex involved?</title>
			<link>https://www.landoverbaptist.net/forum/church-forums/creation-science/2080427-when-they-named-god-was-oral-sex-involved</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 16:08:14 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. 2 Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters. 
 
This is how the Bible opens, one could assume God named God, always is, always was. But respectfully,...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. <sup>2 </sup>Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters.<br />
<br />
This is how the Bible opens, one could assume God named God, always is, always was. But respectfully, I've been around the block, and I have to glock, that single syllable is all too familiar to me, that one could assume when the name God was first uttered, Hagar tripped and fell unto a zizi and was gagged, and by the force, the name God was conceived, as his gag reflex activated. Now, there is a contradiction here, and that is the &quot;d&quot; at the end of the word. If this oral act did indeed name the almighty, that d sound is a closure movement and surely would have bit the zizi off. So perhaps this is a baseless conspiracy theory. Of course, someone like Hagar, sounds like the name of someone seasoned around the block, and makes a credible candidate for this proposal. <br />
<br />
Merci for reading and your attention to this issue.]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="https://www.landoverbaptist.net/forum/church-forums/creation-science">Creation Science</category>
			<dc:creator>Madame Frottage</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.landoverbaptist.net/forum/church-forums/creation-science/2080427-when-they-named-god-was-oral-sex-involved</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
