X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: More immigration? Why not just bring back Imperialism?

    Now from what I hear, very frequently shouted and displayed on banners, the occident is the domain of satan. Satans, more particularly, with one country labelled the great satan. What terrible places these must be. No risk would be too great to escape from such tyranny, no eager hope more sweet than the hope to live in a land where one's most cherished beliefs prevailed as the law and government of the land. And we can see on that woman's face this hope that soon she will be free.

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: More immigration? Why not just bring back Imperialism?

      Originally posted by MitzaLizalor View Post
      And we can see on that woman's face this hope that soon she will be free.
      That was wonderfully poetic of you, sister. Best of all, it's on topic. I was expecting the thread to get derailed as people debate why she's wearing a pair of men's boxer-briefs on her head.
      Last edited by Jeb Stuart Thurmond; 09-08-2015, 09:23 PM.
      Disagree? By failing to register and debate me, you prove that liberals are factless frauds who only persuade through intimidation. To prove otherwise, debate me!
      Got Questions? See Frequently Asked Questions, or use Forum Search, tag system, or our guides on Geography, History, Science, Comparative Religion, Civics, and Current Events.
      Did I use a new word you've never heard? Definitions here. | Vote! Everything you need to vote here!

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: More immigration? Why not just bring back Imperialism?

        If the sincerest form of flattery is imitation, then near-plagiarism is even more so. Here's what I wrote on April 9th, followed by what someone else wrote on November 7th:

        Originally posted by Jeb Stuart Thurmond View Post
        All across the world, people are willing to leave tropical paradises, crossing oceans on overcrowded, rickety boats, agreeing to be smuggled by criminals, suffering hardships and dangers I can't even imagine, all in the name of arriving at frozen wastelands.

        Why?

        Because brown people really, really want to be governed by white people...

        The problem with their scheme is that it involves moving millions of people thousands of miles, just to cross an imaginary line on a map to get them closer to a couple of politicians.

        A more efficient way would be to move the handful of politicians over that imaginary line, so nobody has to get on rickety rafts or trade tropical paradise for snow in April.

        I hear that a lot of people want to migrate to...Finland. I'm pretty sure it's not because they like Finland's climate, or scenery. I don't think it's got anything to do with the physical geography of Finland. I think that they want to move to Finland because they like Finland's political, legal, and social institutions, and all the good things those institutions bring. They want to live somewhere that is ruled by Finns.

        There are two ways to satisfy that desire.

        1. We can move the people who want to live there to the country they want to live in.

        2. We can move the country they want to live in to the people who want to live there.

        If nobody cared about physical geography, those two solutions would be exactly the same. But if people do care about physical geography, and want to move to Finland despite not liking its climate, the second solution would be better.

        Letting people migrate across borders is not enough; we need to let land migrate across borders too.

        So instead of moving the people across the borders, we should move the borders across the people. What people are really voting for, when they vote with their feet, is imperialism. They want to be ruled by foreigners.

        I can't complain, it's written far better than the original. The author sure isn't "butchering the classics".
        Imperialism has a bad name only because, in the past, countries moved to places where the people living there didn't want to be ruled by foreigners.

        Yeah, Ghandi and company were a bunch of xenophobic racist pricks. But they had a point, empires tended to be exploitative, because the empires were monopolies and all monopolies are exploitative.

        But what if the empires competed against each other, with elections? So Nigerians could vote for "The China Party" to have Chinese rulers, or the "The Sweden Party", or of course the regular Nigerian parties, let's call them the "Getheadsawnoffbybokoharamicrats" and the "rapingvirginscuresAIDSipublicans".
        Disagree? By failing to register and debate me, you prove that liberals are factless frauds who only persuade through intimidation. To prove otherwise, debate me!
        Got Questions? See Frequently Asked Questions, or use Forum Search, tag system, or our guides on Geography, History, Science, Comparative Religion, Civics, and Current Events.
        Did I use a new word you've never heard? Definitions here. | Vote! Everything you need to vote here!

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: More immigration? Why not just bring back Imperialism?

          Originally posted by Jeb Stuart Thurmond View Post
          Here's a compromise: how about we conquer only useless, uninhabited parts of the the third world - deserts like what Las Vegas was before white government, swamps like what Hong Kong used to be, before white government. We allow anyone to immigrate into our uninhabited city-state.

          Then we wait.

          Then freedom does its thing.
          I see you had a talk with Donald Trump, he's talking about your plan:




          Donald Trump copied this post too, right down to talking about the weather:
          Instead, he would build a safe zone for refugees, who, Trump says, all want to go home after the crisis is over anyway.
          "In Syria, take a big swatch of land, which believe me, you get for the right price, okay? You take a big swatch and you don't destroy all of Europe."
          He expanded on the issues moments later, saying, "What I'd like is build a safe zone, it's here, build a big beautiful safe zone and you have whatever it is so people can live, and they'll be happier."
          As Trump sees it, this happiness stems from the fact that they won't have to learn the languages of the places they'd move and wouldn't have to get used to new climates or weather patterns.
          "I mean they're gonna learn German, they're gonna learn all these different languages. It's ridiculous. The weather — a friend of mine lives in Minnesota. And he calls me, he says 'Can you imagine? It's 130 degrees in Syria and now they want to send some up to Minnesota where its 30 degrees.' Well, these people are gonna be very, very unhappy. It's cold and beautiful, but it's cold."
          Founder and CEO of Trickle-Down Charities™, LLC.

          Current Project: Bedmates For Billionaires: Biblical eldercare straight from King David
          Goal:
          $500,000 Currently raised: $0.11 DONATE NOW! Yes, we accept Biblecoins!

          True Christians™ believe they they exist to serve the Bible-revealed will of God.
          False Christians believe the Bible exists to serve their will. GOD IS NOT YOUR YES-MAN!

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: More immigration? Why not just bring back Imperialism?

            A bit late for April Fools day, oh well:

            Founder and CEO of Trickle-Down Charities™, LLC.

            Current Project: Bedmates For Billionaires: Biblical eldercare straight from King David
            Goal:
            $500,000 Currently raised: $0.11 DONATE NOW! Yes, we accept Biblecoins!

            True Christians™ believe they they exist to serve the Bible-revealed will of God.
            False Christians believe the Bible exists to serve their will. GOD IS NOT YOUR YES-MAN!

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: More immigration? Why not just bring back Imperialism?

              Originally posted by Jeb Stuart Thurmond View Post
              Come to think of it, why not have an immigration policy that ONLY allows women in?

              ...I'm sure that even life-long fans of policy wonkage have never heard of the idea crossing anyone's minds, even as a joke.
              This is the closest I've found:
              The feminists in Europe have notably been in favor of this mass migration of young men, and conspicuously unconcerned with sexual violence perpetrated by Muslims in Europe. I am not surprised by this at all, because I don't take feminists or feminism at face value. I am sure that they would be up in arms if the migration consisted mainly of cute Japanese girls.
              The whole article is good, it says that feminists import foreign men to drive down male bargaining power. This is why I can't get on board Trumps Muslim ban. For a guy called the God-emperor, he thinks way too small.

              Let's weaponize our immigration policy, and allow unlimited young women from the worst Muslim countries to immigrate.

              Let's make it such an attractive option that the worst Muslim countries turn into continent-spanning sausage parties, and they have to fight civil wars over who gets sloppy seconds on the last camel that can still stand up.

              And just think of what will happen when every American man is given a choice between being divorced by a fat purple-haired feminist bitch, or growing old with three meek, submissive, doe-eyed wives in the kitchen.

              Both the Islamists and the Feminists, killed with the same stone! What's not to love?
              Last edited by Jeb Stuart Thurmond; 02-19-2017, 04:54 PM.
              Disagree? By failing to register and debate me, you prove that liberals are factless frauds who only persuade through intimidation. To prove otherwise, debate me!
              Got Questions? See Frequently Asked Questions, or use Forum Search, tag system, or our guides on Geography, History, Science, Comparative Religion, Civics, and Current Events.
              Did I use a new word you've never heard? Definitions here. | Vote! Everything you need to vote here!

              Comment

              Working...
              X