[James Hutchins]

Re: creationist mormons, i challenge you.

do you have a question or not?

Sure do! Being you are a Oxford biologist, you will have the scientific (lies) answer to this:

Only camels and humans have concave hemoglobin. Why is this?

I know you will give me a real answer (and some wiki BS) as you are so qualified and came here to be challenged.

[tom111]

Re: creationist mormons, i challenge you.

Sure do! Being you are a Oxford biologist, you will have the scientific (lies) answer to this:

Only camels and humans have concave hemoglobin. Why is this?

I know you will give me a real answer (and some wiki BS) as you are so qualified and came here to be challenged.

i have already answered that, their are many types of the heamaglobin protien in many different animals, the fact that the human and camel heamaglobin molecule have the same chemical structure is down to prabability.

[James Hutchins]

Re: creationist mormons, i challenge you.

i have already answered that, their are many types of the heamaglobin protien in many different animals, the fact that the human and camel heamaglobin molecule have the same chemical structure is down to prabability.

B.S. answer. Either answer it or leave and never return. I tire of your silliness.

[James Hutchins]

Re: creationist mormons, i challenge you.

Time is up, little tom.
No I am no biologist, my degree was in Organic Chemistry (only a masters) from Princeton, so I did not know the exact explanation, though Ihad an idea.

I got this:

Mammalian erythrocytes are biconcave disks: flattened and depressed in the center, with a dumb-bell shaped cross section. This shape (as well as the loss of organelles) optimizes the cell for the exchange of oxygen with its surroundings. The cells are flexible so as to fit through tiny capillaries, where they release their oxygen load. Erythrocytes are circular, except in the camel family Camelidae, where they are oval.

From here.

Bye tom.

[tom111]

Re: creationist mormons, i challenge you.

B.S. answer. Either answer it or leave and never return. I tire of your silliness.

how many times must i answer a question with fact before you consider it answered, you don't have to believe my answer to be true, (considering the nature of the website you probably won't) but i have answered the question with scientific fact.

next question.

[James Hutchins]

Re: creationist mormons, i challenge you.

how many times must i answer a question with fact before you consider it answered, you don't have to believe my answer to be true, (considering the nature of the website you probably won't) but i have answered the question with scientific fact.

next question.

OK, what is the difference in mass between the right and left hemispheres of the average female brain.

Remember, no peeking.

[James Hutchins]

Re: creationist mormons, i challenge you.

Come on tom, I am not getting any younger. This is a easy one, just like the blood question.

[tom111]

Re: creationist mormons, i challenge you.

OK, what is the difference in mass between the right and left hemispheres of the average female brain.

Remember, no peeking.

what does that have to do with evolution and creationism.

[James Hutchins]

Re: creationist mormons, i challenge you.

what does that have to do with evolution and creationism.

It took you five minutes to ask this?

OK, it seems I'll have to walk you to the evilutionist answer...

Man....Woman----> They are different

Brain, has a right and left side...... Woman----->How do they think (hint---Evilutionists have a 'excuse')

Difference in the brain????? Gee.... Which side is dominant and therefore a greater mass?


tom, I thought you might be a tad entertaining. Instead, you are turning out to be an utter dolt. You should show the registrar this thread and demand a refund from Oxford. Use the money to learn how to dig ditches.

[tom111]

Re: creationist mormons, i challenge you.

It took you five minutes to ask this?

OK, it seems I'll have to walk you to the evilutionist answer...

Man....Woman----> They are different

Brain, has a right and left side...... Woman----->How do they think (hint---Evilutionists have a 'excuse')

Difference in the brain????? Gee.... Which side is dominant and therefore a greater mass?


tom, I thought you might be a tad entertaining. Instead, you are turning out to be an utter dolt. You should show the registrar this thread and demand a refund from Oxford. Use the money to learn how to dig ditches.

the reason it took me that long is because there is a time limit between posts for me and my infarction.

dont ask me questions you know the answer to.

[James Hutchins]

Re: creationist mormons, i challenge you.

the reason it took me that long is because there is a time limit between posts for me and my infarction.

dont ask me questions you know the answer to.

But tom... I am the (in your words) 'mormon', what could I possibly know.

The reality here, tom, is that it appears I have a much stronger education than you. In fact, I think you'll find, nearly ever member in good standing has more knowledge than you.
See tom, you came to a battle of wits unarmed. Not a good choice though, knowing you as I do now, I am not surprised. You simply did not know any better.
Your best chance of saving any respect is admit your massive mistakes, stay and learn.

[tom111]

Re: creationist mormons, i challenge you.

But tom... I am the (in your words) 'mormon', what could I possibly know.

The reality here, tom, is that it appears I have a much stronger education than you. In fact, I think you'll find, nearly ever member in good standing has more knowledge than you.
See tom, you came to a battle of wits unarmed. Not a good choice though, knowing you as I do now, I am not surprised. You simply did not know any better.
Your best chance of saving any respect is admit your massive mistakes, stay and learn.

you people seem to diliberately misunderstand everything i say, their is no point persuing this further.

oh well, hail satan, good night.

[James Hutchins]

Re: creationist mormons, i challenge you.

No tom, we understand exactly what you say. You thought you'd argue that we came from fish or monkeys. However, part of that argument also covers the questions we asked that you had zero answer for. You, a biologist from the mighty Oxford. You are an embarrassment to the free Godly world. You should be ashamed.

Such a witty salutation!

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: creationist mormons, i challenge you.

[...]the direct question that has been put to me has been answered, what is your question.

No it hasn't! What evolutionary advantage has there been in the concave hemoglobin? Why do not humans and camels rule the earth side by side? Why was there not an Jesus equivalent of a camel? (and don't give me anything about the Hunchback of Notredame - he was a catlick!)

PS, we think that Mormons are morons; please do not confuse Independent Baptists with any other "social gathering".

Another question - Why the platypus? Whither the echidna? Whence the nigra? Why for the virus, which is probably not even alive?

Do the wonders of God not abound?

[James Hutchins]

Re: creationist mormons, i challenge you.

Sadly, tom has played out as an idiot. No other way to put it. Simple 'science' questions that any grade schooler can answer, he was clueless. Even the simplest one of all, the difference between hemispheres of a female brain. He had nary a clue.