"Missing link": Yet more evil-utionist nonsense

[Melissa D]

Re: "Missing link": Yet more evil-utionist nonsense

Australopithecus means Southern ape. It has nothing to do with humans. The media blew this completely out of proportion. It's just irresponsible and dangerous news reporting, as always. People will always find evidence for what they want to prove as opposed to looking at the facts first and then working out a conclusion from that.

[Rev. Jim Osborne]

Re: "Missing link": Yet more evil-utionist nonsense

The "evidence" these scientists offer is as tenable as a fart in the wind. Bone fragments? Seriously? How can they know what kind of creature they found if they found some bone fragments? It's not like they can draw a picture of it from this scant evidence.

It's funny how these evilutionists never, ever find a complete skeleton. It's always half a jawbone or some splinters from a femur. If evolution happened, these creatures would be everywhere and they would find a complete skeleton.

It's plainly obvious to anyone that this is just wishful thinking and conjecture. It pains me to realize our children are told lies like this in public schools!

[Brother Enoch]

Re: "Missing link": Yet more evil-utionist nonsense

Insanity. We have retarded children today, I'm sure they had retarded children 6,000 years ago. Missing link? No! It's just the bones of one of these:

[Pastor Isaac Peters]

Here is the latest attempt to support the evil-utionist monkey cult, as reported in an Englandistani "news" source:

Missing link between man and apes found
A "missing link" between humans and their apelike ancestors has been discovered.

The new species of hominid, the evolutionary branch of primates that includes humans, is to be revealed when the two-million-year-old skeleton of a child is unveiled this week.

Scientists believe the almost-complete fossilised skeleton belonged to a previously-unknown type of early human ancestor that may have been a intermediate stage as ape-men evolved into the first species of advanced humans, Homo habilis.

Of course, monkey-worshiping scientists must then discover a missing link between monkeys and that "hominid" and one between that "hominid" and man, as well as missing links between consecutive ones of those missing links, and so on. We Bible believers have no such problem, since we know that man came from dust, not monkeys:

Genesis 2:7: And the LORD God formed man [of] the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.

The following part of the article is also interesting:

Most fossilised hominid remains are little more than scattered fragments of bone, so the discovery of an almost-complete skeleton will allow scientists to answer key questions about what our early ancestors looked like and when they began walking upright on two legs.

So most of the "missing links" are just scattered fragments of bone? How convenient.