[IdiocyofMYUniverse]

Re: evolutionists get owneds again!

Oh, no! A misunderstanding on your behalf and my behalf has destroyed the atheist community. Contrast that to religion!

http://www.atheist-experience.com/

[FreeFromBrains]

Re: evolutionists get owneds again!

1 - We don't come from monkeys. All fossils are TRANSITIONAL fossils.

2 - Abiogenesis, see Stanley Miller-Spiegelman Experiment.

3 - The Christians once again making the rules so you can never win. Who created god? Using your logic everything has a creator. The CORRECT answer to this question is "I don't know." Not, "I'm gonna make up an invisible sky daddy to explain it." Nevertheless, have you heard of M-Strong Theory?

No such thing as M-Strong theory, hot pants.

If you mean M theory or one of the String theories please be more precise: you make atheists look bad.

[IdiocyofMYUniverse]

Re: evolutionists get owneds again!

Mr.EvolutionMyAss kick evolutionist butts in this here videos

1 - We don't come from monkeys. All fossils are TRANSITIONAL fossils.

2 - Abiogenesis, see Stanley Miller-Spiegelman Experiment.

3 - The Christians once again making the rules so you can never win. Who created god? Using your logic everything has a creator. The CORRECT answer to this question is "I don't know." Not, "I'm gonna make up an invisible sky daddy to explain it." Nevertheless, have you heard of M-Strong Theory?

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: evolutionists get owneds again!

Yes yes dahling, I know, I'm trying to dumb it down here ok? Keep it simples and so on.

You are doing a good job of the dumbing, dear.

Why, I'm thoroughly convinced you don't know what you're talking about.

[wait_what]

Re: evolutionists get owneds again!

Yes yes dahling, I know, I'm trying to dumb it down here ok? Keep it simples and so on.

Just a creative way to say that you are lying.

[Twiggy]

Re: evolutionists get owneds again!

As wait_what has pointed out, you would still be wrong according to Darwin.

Descendants do not, according to Darwinism, grow improvements because of their environment. Darwin said that the ones who had random mutations that enhanced their survival and their ability to reproduce outbred those who did not have those beneficial mutations.

In other words, giraffes didn't "grow longer necks" to reach tall trees. Giraffes with longer necks could reach tall trees, and survived to mate with other giraffes with long necks, which encouraged the trait of long-neckedness.

Granted, there's no evidence of short-necked giraffes, and God created them with long necks, but still . . . that's how Evilution is supposed to work.

Yes yes dahling, I know, I'm trying to dumb it down here ok? Keep it simples and so on.

[wait_what]

Re: evolutionists get owneds again!

As wait_what has pointed out, you would still be wrong according to Darwin.

Descendants do not, according to Darwinism, grow improvements because of their environment. Darwin said that the ones who had random mutations that enhanced their survival and their ability to reproduce outbred those who did not have those beneficial mutations.

In other words, giraffes didn't "grow longer necks" to reach tall trees. Giraffes with longer necks could reach tall trees, and survived to mate with other giraffes with long necks, which encouraged the trait of long-neckedness.

Granted, there's no evidence of short-necked giraffes, and God created them with long necks, but still . . . that's how Evilution is supposed to work.

Thank you. I could not find words to express to her what I knew being as enraged as I was that would still speak the truth. I appreciate your fine command of Truth and understanding of the lies that are constantly spread Reverend.

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: evolutionists get owneds again!

No I didn't..
Apart from the mistake between ancestors and descendants, but I corrected myself afterwards

As wait_what has pointed out, you would still be wrong according to Darwin.

Descendants do not, according to Darwinism, grow improvements because of their environment. Darwin said that the ones who had random mutations that enhanced their survival and their ability to reproduce outbred those who did not have those beneficial mutations.

In other words, giraffes didn't "grow longer necks" to reach tall trees. Giraffes with longer necks could reach tall trees, and survived to mate with other giraffes with long necks, which encouraged the trait of long-neckedness.

Granted, there's no evidence of short-necked giraffes, and God created them with long necks, but still . . . that's how Evilution is supposed to work.

[wait_what]

Re: evolutionists get owneds again!

No I didn't..
Apart from the mistake between ancestors and descendants, but I corrected myself afterwards

Yes, you did. You are going to lie to us now? Really? There was discussion about needing to lift your arms to climb and everything. You tried to defend large deltoids being necessary to climbing.

And still, your version of evolution does not fit with Darwin's model nor modern "understanding" at all. I suggest after reading your Bible re-taking your Intro to Biology classes and paying attention this time.

[Saint Elmo]

Re: evolutionists get owneds again!

I ain't for sure what y'all talking bout but TIME TRAVEL IS AN OBOMINATION!

[Twiggy]

Re: evolutionists get owneds again!

Not only that, but according to your version of "natural selection" you said that if an organism underwent certain selective pressures that would cause it to change its environment, i.e. moving to trees, then said organism's ANCESTORS would grow new adaptations such as big deltoids. Which is really weird since gorillas have bigger deltoids than their tree dwelling neighbors even though they don't climb much.

What's funny is even if you switched ancestors for descendants you would still be wrong according to Darwin.

No I didn't..
Apart from the mistake between ancestors and descendants, but I corrected myself afterwards

[wait_what]

Re: evolutionists get owneds again!

I see what;s happened here. You saw my post about liking Doctor Who and assumed that I believe I time travel even though I explained that I had made a mistake afterwards and rectified it

Not only that, but according to your version of "natural selection" you said that if an organism underwent certain selective pressures that would cause it to change its environment, i.e. moving to trees, then said organism's ANCESTORS would grow new adaptations such as big deltoids. Which is really weird since gorillas have bigger deltoids than their tree dwelling neighbors even though they don't climb much.

What's funny is even if you switched ancestors for descendants you would still be wrong according to Darwin.

[Twiggy]

Re: evolutionists get owneds again!

Really you have no frame of reference. Read the KJV 1611. Then, I suggest once you have the proper perspective, to go out and read Mendel's work, Darwin's, and any other scientist. You obviously haven't. There are some interesting "theories" out there. While they are not the truth, I have a full understanding of them.

They do not talk of the wizardry of time travel like your version does, I can tell you that. They also don't hop species when they come up with a non-functioning example either. They label it "experimental error." Learn your stories before you share them, otherwise you just mess them up.

I see what;s happened here. You saw my post about liking Doctor Who and assumed that I believe I time travel even though I explained that I had made a mistake afterwards and rectified it

[wait_what]

Re: evolutionists get owneds again!

Ok sweet pea

Really you have no frame of reference. Read the KJV 1611. Then, I suggest once you have the proper perspective, to go out and read Mendel's work, Darwin's, and any other scientist. You obviously haven't. There are some interesting "theories" out there. While they are not the truth, I have a full understanding of them.

They do not talk of the wizardry of time travel like your version does, I can tell you that. They also don't hop species when they come up with a non-functioning example either. They label it "experimental error." Learn your stories before you share them, otherwise you just mess them up.

[Twiggy]

Re: evolutionists get owneds again!

Changing your story won't help your cause at all. I am not going to google anything until you have read the KJV 1611 cover to cover. You came here, remember?

If you knew my secular training, you would know that I actually have a firm understanding of the "theory" you atheists think is true. I tolerated it so that I could get a profession where I can really do some good missionary work while making great money to pay tithing with.

Ok sweet pea