X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Jack O'fagan
    replied
    Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

    Originally posted by Zandthee View Post
    Even a brainless donkey can see the skeleton's have way different feet in one second.
    Yes, what you are looking at microevolutional changes. The modern day kangaroo has proportionally bigger feet that the K Rex. I have bigger feet than my grandad, does that mean that we are a different species?

    And do not dismiss donkeys as being brainless. Remember that they have been recorded historically as speaking human language.

    Numbers 22:29And Balaam said unto the ass, Because thou hast mocked me: I would there were a sword in mine hand, for now would I kill thee.
    30And the ass said unto Balaam, Am not I thine ass, upon which thou hast ridden ever since I was thine unto this day? was I ever wont to do so unto thee? and he said, Nay.

    YIC

    Jack

    Leave a comment:


  • Faith_Machine
    replied
    Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

    Originally posted by Zandthee View Post
    Even a brainless donkey can see the skeleton's have way different feet in one second.
    And if you'd bothered to give Dr. Jones' research anything more than a cursory reading, you would know he's already accounted for those changes quite satisfactorily.

    You can't hope to debate an issue that you don't understand, son.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zandthee
    replied
    Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

    Originally posted by Faith_Machine View Post
    Do you really think Dr. Isaiah Jones would put this much time and effort into a joke? Please read his research thoroughly, and you'll see that he has more than adequately accounted for any perceived differences in the skull shape of Kangaroosaurus Rex vs. modern kangaroos.
    Even a brainless donkey can see the skeleton's have way different feet in one second.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pastor Ezekiel
    replied
    Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

    Originally posted by Zandthee View Post
    Please PLEASE tell me this is a joke!! Ahaha looking at the pictures for one second you see the skeletons don't look alike at ALL. The head and feet are way WAY different! x) This "research" is totally bollocks.
    Like an eskimo would know anything about kangaroos.

    Leave a comment:


  • Faith_Machine
    replied
    Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

    Originally posted by Zandthee View Post
    Please PLEASE tell me this is a joke!! Ahaha looking at the pictures for one second you see the skeletons don't look alike at ALL. The head and feet are way WAY different! x) This "research" is totally bollocks.
    Do you really think Dr. Isaiah Jones would put this much time and effort into a joke? Please read his research thoroughly, and you'll see that he has more than adequately accounted for any perceived differences in the skull shape of Kangaroosaurus Rex vs. modern kangaroos.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zandthee
    replied
    Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

    Please PLEASE tell me this is a joke!! Ahaha looking at the pictures for one second you see the skeletons don't look alike at ALL. The head and feet are way WAY different! x) This "research" is totally bollocks.



    Originally posted by Dr. Isaiah Jones View Post
    In the pre-flood world there was a canopy of water in the stratosphere. This is clearly documented in Genesis 1:6-8 which states:
    "And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters. And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so. And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day."


    The water layer above the firmament had several important functions such as warm temperature, higher oxygen content and carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, and the blocking of ultraviolet radiation coming from the sun. This caused all plants and animals to grow much larger than they do today as it states in Genesis 6:4:
    "There were giants in the earth in those days;"
    Many secular scientists would probably try to refute this but at the same time they completely ignore the fact that this can be proven by a simple analysis.

    First let's take a look at the bone structure of a kangaroo:



    These are the bones of a normal Austrian kangaroo, not so much special about that… or is there?
    Well, let's take a look at the following image:



    Looks familiar? These are the bones of the Tyrannosaurus Rex dinosaur. According to secular science these "vicious" creatures roamed the earth "millions of years ago" before they ultimately became extinct following an "unexplained" catastrophic event.

    However, if we look at the bone structures of these two separate animals we notice that they're almost completely identical. As you can see, this is a definite PROOF that the Tyrannosaurus Rex did not become extinct. It was actually just a giant kangaroo.

    ---- UPDATE ----

    I have found some stunning evidence that further supports my theory regarding the Kangarosaurus:



    A "killer kangaroo", huh... Sounds familiar?



    It continues:



    Take that, stupid non-believers!



    - Dr. Isaiah Jones, Ph.D., Biblical Archaeologist

    Leave a comment:


  • Pastor Ezekiel
    replied
    Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

    Originally posted by Driveler View Post
    Sir True Disciple I was wondering:what caused all these animals to stray from the original path of God.Was making animals carnivore a smaller punishment that went along with the flood?Or was it the corruption of Satan?

    They're just dumb animals. They are put on the earth for Mankind to use as we please.

    Have you ever read the Holy Bible?

    Leave a comment:


  • Driveler
    replied
    Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

    Originally posted by True Disciple View Post


    Well, Sister, you must realize that, before the flood, all animals were herbivores. After all, it is only after the flood that God commands humans to eat meat:

    Genesis 9:3:
    Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things.

    Here God says that He gave us meat to eat in addition to green herb He already gave us to eat, meaning that the eating of meat is something postdiluvian. After all, God originally gives animals and humans only plants to eat.
    Sir True Disciple I was wondering:what caused all these animals to stray from the original path of God.Was making animals carnivore a smaller punishment that went along with the flood?Or was it the corruption of Satan?

    Leave a comment:


  • Jack O'fagan
    replied
    Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

    Originally posted by Faith_Machine View Post
    Is this fool done diverting the conversation away from Dr. Isaiah Jones' groundbreaking research yet?

    I'd much prefer discussing the magnificent beast, kangoroosaurus, than some harebrained notions some kid learned in a Philosophy 101 class.
    I printed out the Dr's wonderful research and presented it the our local homeschooling group. It's great to see the all the children playing now, I often see them growling and leaping up and down the street pretending to be a herd of K Rex.

    YIC

    Jack

    Leave a comment:


  • Faith_Machine
    replied
    Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

    Is this fool done diverting the conversation away from Dr. Isaiah Jones' groundbreaking research yet?

    I'd much prefer discussing the magnificent beast, kangoroosaurus, than some harebrained notions some kid learned in a Philosophy 101 class.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bobby-Joe
    replied
    Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

    Originally posted by Billy Bob Jenkins View Post
    Genesis 9:6 tells us that the punishment for killing is killing. I suppose you will tell us that that is a contradiction. Only if you have no common sense. It is obvious that the sanctions and commandments that require us to kill are exceptions to the rule "thou shalt not kill". Anyone with common sense recognizes this.

    You are saying that we should pick and choose which commandments to follow. I am saying we should follow all of them. Who makes more sense? The idea that it is hypocritical to execute murderers is just a convoluted justification for usurping God's authority.
    Glory!

    Only God is moral enough to tell us when it is right to kill people!

    Leave a comment:


  • Billy Bob Jenkins
    replied
    Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

    Originally posted by logo73 View Post
    They say: #5 "Do not kill"

    But soldiers have to kill and most people and institutions accept that as a means of 'self-defence'. But it doesn't say: "Do not kill, given that it's not self-defence" It just says: "Do not kill".
    The problem of the law #5 is, that it's too short-minded and does not take situations into account, where you ca not follow that law in defence of yourself or of others.

    I'm more and more watching the discovery channel with increasing joy. And there was a family of lions described with young ones. And there was not enough meat during the summer months. Then suddenly a lonly lioness came and it turned out shw had abducted some of the offspring and killed them. She was a loner and lacked the social bahavior. But the rest of the family protected their young ones and quickly drove her out. She is the perfect example or a murderer. But with that behavior she will always stay alone and will have less chances to get food, because hunting alone is harder. But some young ones survived and now all the food was enough for them to survive. So, some died for others to survive.
    So, what's that story like? Is shows, that absolute values like #5 do not really exist. They depend on the group and even within a group they can vary. But sometimes. it's better to work together, than to engage into any conflict, because it gives more chances to survive for all.

    Now, you ask why you can not kill gays/lesbians. They also add an important aspect to society. They are a regulatory step in society and just as important as straights. Or spoken in terms of the comparison with the lions: if there had been two gay lions, some young ones would not have been born and food would have been enough for all from the beginning onwards.
    Genesis 9:6 tells us that the punishment for killing is killing. I suppose you will tell us that that is a contradiction. Only if you have no common sense. It is obvious that the sanctions and commandments that require us to kill are exceptions to the rule "thou shalt not kill". Anyone with common sense recognizes this.

    You are saying that we should pick and choose which commandments to follow. I am saying we should follow all of them. Who makes more sense? The idea that it is hypocritical to execute murderers is just a pathetic and convoluted justification for usurping God's authority, and it discredits your whole case against Christianity. I'm sure you can do much better than that.
    Last edited by Billy Bob Jenkins; 05-25-2012, 11:18 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Redeemed Papist
    replied
    Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

    Originally posted by logo73 View Post
    Now, you ask why you can not kill gays/lesbians. They also add an important aspect to society.
    Sounds like a matter of opinion to me. So if that opinion is that they are an abomination it's OK to kill them. You atheists surely do sit on the fence.

    So all we need to do is work hard to change people's opinions so they match God's.

    Thank you for agreeing with us at last.

    Leave a comment:


  • loco73
    replied
    Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

    Originally posted by Billy Bob Jenkins View Post
    What about the Commandments of God? Aren't they a sufficient rationale to institute such things?

    They say: #5 "Do not kill"

    But soldiers have to kill and most people and institutions accept that as a means of 'self-defence'. But it doesn't say: "Do not kill, given that it's not self-defence" It just says: "Do not kill".
    The problem of the law #5 is, that it's too short-minded and does not take situations into account, where you ca not follow that law in defence of yourself or of others.

    I'm more and more watching the discovery channel with increasing joy. And there was a family of lions described with young ones. And there was not enough meat during the summer months. Then suddenly a lonly lioness came and it turned out shw had abducted some of the offspring and killed them. She was a loner and lacked the social bahavior. But the rest of the family protected their young ones and quickly drove her out. She is the perfect example or a murderer. But with that behavior she will always stay alone and will have less chances to get food, because hunting alone is harder. But some young ones survived and now all the food was enough for them to survive. So, some died for others to survive.
    So, what's that story like? Is shows, that absolute values like #5 do not really exist. They depend on the group and even within a group they can vary. But sometimes. it's better to work together, than to engage into any conflict, because it gives more chances to survive for all.

    Now, you ask why you can not kill gays/lesbians. They also add an important aspect to society. They are a regulatory step in society and just as important as straights. Or spoken in terms of the comparison with the lions: if there had been two gay lions, some young ones would not have been born and food would have been enough for all from the beginning onwards.

    Leave a comment:


  • Billy Bob Jenkins
    replied
    Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

    Originally posted by logo73 View Post
    Correct. Just as I said. No rule is absolute. There are no absolute values. Values depend on the viewpoint.
    So, you would concede that slavery and genocide are sometimes acceptable practices, depending on various conditions? Some liberals are very closed minded about these things.

    What about the Commandments of God? Aren't they a sufficient rationale to institute such things?

    So when you say that slavery is wrong, and genocide is wrong, you are denying our right to practice our religion in any meaningful way. The Bible commands us to have these institutions.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X