[Faith_Machine]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

It seems you have mistakenly blah, blah, blah...

Dear Two-Faced Evolutionist:

Please hie yourself* to the Introduction Forum and post a proper introduction! We'd really like to get to know you before engaging in any sort of debate! Of course, we won't engage in a debate even after getting to know you, because THIS IS NOT A DEBATE FORUM.

Thank you, and God bless!




*That means get yourself over there real quick-like.

[ManyFace]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

It seems you have mistakenly neglected to post the image of the skull of this supposed "Killer Kangaroo". I see a lot of your quoted information is from an article on the National Geographic website and BBC, and it looks as though you accidentally omitted the part where on NATGEO they mention that the marsupial had "big powerful forelimbs". I'm sure this was just a mistake, and even though it may outwardly appear to have a vivid contrast to the cherry picked quotes you provided, has no bearing over the credibility of your account of events.

Surely one cannot deny what is in front of their eyes like the images you provided [albeit you forgot to post the carnivorous kangaroo's skull], displaying clear resemblances in anatomical structure. Sure, you and I may not be osteologists who can give a factual accounts using "actual evidence" and "extensive elaboration" on how different these skeletons actually are, but I'll be damned to Hell if it isn't clear in your images that they look at least moderatly alike.

It's just like how Bats are actually just flying descendants of humans. Or how Iguanas are a reptilian version of us. If you look at their skeletons you can clearly see they both have five fingers and rib cages; eerily like us humans. If you look at the image supplied the bat shows a resemblance to us, and if it weren't for the fact that I already knew what it was, I would have assumed it was a very long fingered bipedal canine human morph [God forbid; a monstrosity like that would be a clear byproduct of Sodomy].

Surely those skeleton comparisons are sure fire proof of a reptilian dinosaur being fake, rather the t-rex was always just a giant mammal.


The skeletal head of the Killer Kangaroo


One of the many findings of Tyrannosaurus Rex. Clearly these two skulls are the same.


The Iguana skeleton which clearly depicts similarities to our own skeletons.


A lateral view of a bat skeleton. You see what I mean by very long fingered bipedal canine human morph? Frightening.

I wholeheartedly thank you Doctor for your vague but very convincing account of ancient history. May you ascend to the highest part of heaven and enjoy your eternal rest. Make sure you also high five God when you get there. I heard he was a pretty cool guy; sometimes a bit too harsh or insensitive, but always meaning well apparently. It feels good being under the watch of an omnipresent metaphysical being of absolute yet invisible power. God is like a magician and puppeteer, only a lot older. Speaking of, shouldn't magicians and puppeteers be smote for feigning God and pretending to be false idols?

[Billy Bob Jenkins]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

(sigh) I meant the feathers. and besides, in this drawing I don't see any arms on the T-Rex. the neck also is more similar in the chicken and t-Rex being that it is more S-shaped. An finally, what about the scaly feet.

It doesn't matter if you can prove that the T-Rex descended from Oprah Winfrey. You still can't use this as an argument to defend atheism or anal sex. You will be in the same exact position that you started out in. Your not a logician, are you? Because your logic is a failure.

[Faith_Machine]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

Did T-Rex have a beak?

No.

Do chickens have beaks?

Yes.

Did T-Rex have teeth?

Yes.

Do chickens have teeth?

No.

CASE CLOSED!

[Jack O'fagan]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

(sigh) I meant the feathers. and besides, in this drawing I don't see any arms on the T-Rex. the neck also is more similar in the chicken and t-Rex being that it is more S-shaped. An finally, what about the scaly feet.

So you have posted a drawing that someone has done of an imaginary half dinosaur/half bird and you are trying to use this as evidence.

[Rupture Joey]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

(sigh) I meant the feathers. and besides, in this drawing I don't see any arms on the T-Rex. the neck also is more similar in the chicken and t-Rex being that it is more S-shaped. An finally, what about the scaly feet.

[Alphonse Alban]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

I think this looks more like this:

You are right. On those pictures you can see similar posture on both T-rex and kangaroo. Same with small front legs, head with teeth and and long tail. You are still right, on chicken they are even more visible.

[Rupture Joey]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo



I think this looks more like this:



than this:

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

To me this looks more like a chicken than a kangaroo

Son, you need to lay off the devil's weed.

[Rupture Joey]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

To me this looks more like a chicken than a kangaroo, and allot more bird like than mammal like. Besides I find your belief that it is a giant kangaroo even more laughable.

As far as the bones and fossils, I have gone on digs to find them but they where not T-Rex fossils. The skeletons you use to say that they are similar are from the same scientists that you called unchecked.

Oh why would I need to go dig up kangaroo fossils when the living thing is in the wilds of Australia.

[Mary Etheldreda]

I love atheist science - so funny!!!




is the same as...

[Zechariah Smyth]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

Oh boy... calm down now Joey,calm down (exhales) I don't know if anyone posted this or not but T-Rex is not a giant KANGAROO! One a kangaroos arms are longer relative to their body size. Second the head shape and teeth are different. Third they don't even belong to the same Class or phylum meaning they aren't even closely related. In fact Tyrannosaurus Rex was more related to the modern day chickens. The feathers you see on him have not been discovered and are not fact but a theory by the fact that their hips are shaped like that of a birds. And even if they were related, which they are not, you don't see any kangaroo fossils at the same time or in the same place so logically you are basically saying that they EVOLVED in to modern day kangaroos, at least you are saying that with the fact that humans got smaller.

How many kangaroo fossils have you personally dug up? And where did you personally compare them side-by-side with dinosaur fossils (that, hopefully, you also personally dug up)?

Or are you relying on the unchecked claims of "scientists" to bolster your preconceptions?

Good grief, the blind obedience of the typical secular Jesus-hater boggles the mind!



Yours in Christ,

Z. Smyth

[Jack O'fagan]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

Oh boy... calm down now Joey,calm down (exhales) I don't know if anyone posted this or not but T-Rex is not a giant KANGAROO! One a kangaroos arms are longer relative to their body size. Second the head shape and teeth are different. Third they don't even belong to the same Class or phylum meaning they aren't even closely related. In fact Tyrannosaurus Rex was more related to the modern day chickens. The feathers you see on him have not been discovered and are not fact but a theory by the fact that their hips are shaped like that of a birds. And even if they were related, which they are not, you don't see any kangaroo fossils at the same time or in the same place so logically you are basically saying that they EVOLVED in to modern day kangaroos, at least you are saying that with the fact that humans got smaller.

You think that T Rex was a giant chicken?!!!!

I have tears in my eyes, that is SO FUNNY!


No clearly it was a giant kangaroo. Just read the evidence.

YIC

Jack

[Rupture Joey]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

Oh boy... calm down now Joey,calm down (exhales) I don't know if anyone posted this or not but T-Rex is not a giant KANGAROO! One a kangaroos arms are longer relative to their body size. Second the head shape and teeth are different. Third they don't even belong to the same Class or phylum meaning they aren't even closely related. In fact Tyrannosaurus Rex was more related to the modern day chickens. The feathers you see on him have not been discovered and are not fact but a theory by the fact that their hips are shaped like that of a birds. And even if they were related, which they are not, you don't see any kangaroo fossils at the same time or in the same place so logically you are basically saying that they EVOLVED in to modern day kangaroos, at least you are saying that with the fact that humans got smaller.

[questionsneedanswers]

Re: Tyrannosaurus Rex: The Giant Kangaroo

who wants to fornicate?