X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Remy Lebeau
    replied
    Re: Sexuliar scientists study sperm

    Originally posted by Rachael Van Helsing View Post
    [/COLOR]
    I wasn't talking about Darren.


    I never said that, nor was I claiming it. But it can be done. Artificial insemination, technically that requires a man's input but that's it. The woman has no contact with the man whatsoever for the insemination process.
    I was saying that, when the baby is first made, the X and Y chromosomes determine male or female. If it's a girl she will get X chromosomes, if its a boy he will get the Y chromosome. The Y chromosome will not show itself in a female baby.
    Where on earth did you get the idea that I was talking about male-free conception?
    You can't have it both ways, witch.

    Either you're saying this X(female) chromosome is 100% the product of a woman, in which case you are also stating that not having a Y chromozone makes one the product of a mother alone since X would be a female only chromozone.

    Or in the case that the male and the female play a part in procreation, the X chromozone must also be of the male. In which case both X and Y are male since an XX(female) or an YX(male) are both the comobination of male and female.

    Some king back in the old days killed his wife, then his second wife, then his third and who knows how many more because he kept having females and no male heirs. Secular pseudo-scientist, your false gods, claim he didn't have any Y's or some rubbish. Clearly everything, rather X or Y, would be of the male according to even false secular fairy tales.

    Get right with Jesus, wench.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lady Sorrow
    replied
    Re: Sexuliar scientists study sperm

    What nonsense you claim, Rachael. The bible clearly states that everything significant comes from men. Typical of a devil worshipping strumpet like you to claim otherwise.
    Why, next thing you'll be saying that women should have equal opportunities in the workplace! The idea, the very idea!

    Leave a comment:


  • Lunadea
    replied
    Re: Sexuliar scientists study sperm

    Originally posted by Remy Lebeau View Post
    Oh, so now women can have babies without a man?

    Can an oven just spontaneously produce a Thanksgiving turkey? No.
    So what makes you think a baby oven can spontaneously produce a baby?
    What about Dolly the sheep and that cute little kittie they cloned? Any sperm involved there?

    All that's needed is a female cell.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rachael Van Helsing
    replied
    Re: Sexuliar scientists study sperm

    Originally posted by Brother Temperance View Post
    So are you claiming it, or aren't you?
    I was not claiming it PRIOR TO THAT POINT. And I do admit that even artificial insemination does involve some input from a man, however it does not require the woman to have contact with the man.

    Leave a comment:


  • Brother Temperance
    replied
    Re: Sexuliar scientists study sperm

    Originally posted by Rachael Van Helsing View Post
    I never said that, nor was I claiming it. But it can be done.
    So are you claiming it, or aren't you?

    Leave a comment:


  • Rachael Van Helsing
    replied
    Re: Sexuliar scientists study sperm

    Originally posted by Remy Lebeau View Post
    Leave Darren-Meyers out of this. He's barely a man anyway.

    I wasn't talking about Darren.

    Oh, so now women can have babies without a man?

    Can an oven just spontaneously produce a Thanksgiving turkey? No.
    So what makes you think a baby oven can spontaneously produce a baby?
    I never said that, nor was I claiming it. But it can be done. Artificial insemination, technically that requires a man's input but that's it. The woman has no contact with the man whatsoever for the insemination process.
    I was saying that, when the baby is first made, the X and Y chromosomes determine male or female. If it's a girl she will get X chromosomes, if its a boy he will get the Y chromosome. The Y chromosome will not show itself in a female baby.
    Where on earth did you get the idea that I was talking about male-free conception?

    Leave a comment:


  • Remy Lebeau
    replied
    Re: Sexuliar scientists study sperm

    Originally posted by Rachael Van Helsing View Post
    Some of those (the words I've bolded) are called standard characteristics, not diseases. Sheeesh. The rest of words which are not bolded would not be restricted to females, especially given some of the men here as an example. *snicker*

    Leave Darren-Meyers out of this. He's barely a man anyway.

    Nope, my X chromosomes would have canceled out the wimpy male Y chromosome. Face it, you're stuck with it. Stop trying to make others share that pain.
    Oh, so now women can have babies without a man?

    Can an oven just spontaneously produce a Thanksgiving turkey? No.
    So what makes you think a baby oven can spontaneously produce a baby?

    Leave a comment:


  • Brother Temperance
    replied
    Re: Sexuliar scientists study sperm

    Originally posted by Ixi View Post
    Men.....

    Have balls
    ... all the men do is stick thier "tallywacker" in and have pleasure.
    Would it kill you to keep your filthy mind out of the gutter for five minutes?

    Leave a comment:


  • Enobarbus
    replied
    Re: Sexuliar scientists study sperm

    Originally posted by Ixi View Post
    Men.....

    Have balls

    Must I say no more? *Kicks*

    I was stronger then my brother since being a fetus, face it, women can be stronger then men. Women are the ones who bring life into the world, all the men do is stick thier "tallywacker" in and have pleasure.
    Are you showing ant-male tendencies icksy? Are you an eclectic pagan or another feminazi?

    Leave a comment:


  • Enobarbus
    replied
    Re: Sexuliar scientists study sperm

    Originally posted by Ixi View Post
    Men.....

    Have balls

    Must I say no more? *Kicks*

    I was stronger then my brother since being a fetus, face it, women can be stronger then men. Women are the ones who bring life into the world, all the men do is stick thier "tallywacker" in and have pleasure.
    Would you like a new avatar. I'll see what's available.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Enobarbus
    replied
    Re: Sexuliar scientists study sperm

    Originally posted by Ixi View Post
    Men.....

    Have balls

    Must I say no more? *Kicks*

    I was stronger then my brother since being a fetus, face it, women can be stronger then men. Women are the ones who bring life into the world, all the men do is stick thier "tallywacker" in and have pleasure.
    You were luckier than your brother. If he had lived he would be bigger and stronger than you and be a better football player (and smarter and better at eveything else of importance). Women were made to pop babies so there are more little soldiers for Jesus on the way all the time. As the good Pastor Al has pointed out, women are overns for babies. Men are designed to just -- like what you said -- and get it over and done with, because they have other important things to get on with, like preaching, being president, etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ixi
    replied
    Re: Sexuliar scientists study sperm

    Men.....

    Have balls

    Must I say no more? *Kicks*

    I was stronger then my brother since being a fetus, face it, women can be stronger then men. Women are the ones who bring life into the world, all the men do is stick thier "tallywacker" in and have pleasure.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rachael Van Helsing
    replied
    Re: Sexuliar scientists study sperm

    Originally posted by Remy Lebeau View Post
    Here is a list of a few female diseases that we will hypothetically assign to these so called X homozones.

    Stupidity
    Physical ineptness
    Child birth.
    Monthly bleeding
    Uncontrollable emotions
    Simple-mindedness
    Heightened sinfulness
    Devious sneakiness
    A vagina.
    Some of those (the words I've bolded) are called standard characteristics, not diseases. Sheeesh. The rest of words which are not bolded would not be restricted to females, especially given some of the men here as an example. *snicker*

    Then you have wimp genes in addition to your British convict genes? Since the father's seed created you, you kleptomaniac trollop.
    Nope, my X chromosomes would have canceled out the wimpy male Y chromosome. Face it, you're stuck with it. Stop trying to make others share that pain.

    Leave a comment:


  • Remy Lebeau
    replied
    Re: Sexuliar scientists study sperm

    Originally posted by Rachael Van Helsing View Post
    And speaking of inherited genes, do you know there are so many diseases and defects which result from having the Y (male) chromosome? In cases like color blindness for example, often this would be canceled out by another X (female) chromosome but a poor little weak Y chromosome is not strong enough to stand up to it.
    Here is a list of a few female diseases that we will hypothetically assign to these so called X homozones.

    Stupidity
    Physical ineptness
    Child birth.
    Monthly bleeding
    Uncontrollable emotions
    Simple-mindedness
    Heightened sinfulness
    Devious sneakiness
    A vagina.

    You men have wimpy genes.
    Then you have wimp genes in addition to your British convict genes? Since the father's seed created you, you kleptomaniac trollop.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rachael Van Helsing
    replied
    Re: Sexuliar scientists study sperm

    Originally posted by Bobby-Joe View Post
    Rachael,

    what is the source of all this? Secular scientist. The Bible clearly shows otherwise. Now it may be fine for you to go off with the latest fad like genetics by we Christians stick with the timeless truths.
    Genetics is not a 'fad', it is a timeless truth. And it provides accurate and useful information. It's assisted so much in medical research, and soon we may have to rely more on geneticists for food, seeing as we'll need plants and animals that can survive in bad atmospheric conditions etc.

    Quit thinking about our pants harlot!
    Did you not see where I wrote:
    Originally posted by Me
    We inherit GENES from both our parents. And NO, I didn't misspell the word, I wasn't thinking of Levi's.
    I'm not talking about your pants. The inside of your mind is probably a scary place!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X