Even the monkey-worshiping scientists admit as much.
Sick-ular source:
There's a clear admission of design, and as we know, a design requires a Designer. In greater detail:
What evil-utionary mechanism could explain that? Some monkey-worshipers hypothesize that the wasp larvae can produce proteins that can alter the spiders' behavior, but what good is half of such a protein? God must have designed the mechanism in order to provide for His creations, in this case the wasps. It seems less advantageous for the spider that is parasitized, enslaved, and ultimately killed, but God's priorities are His and His alone to determine.
Nonetheless, the author backtracks in order to preserve his evil-utionary dogma:
Since the Darwiniacs can't explain it, they appeal to their "evil-ution in the gaps" non-argument. According to the religion of evil-utionism, the spider would have evolved a defense, since those that had done so would have a much better chance of surviving long enough to breed.
Sick-ular source:
The behavior of some animals changes when they are parasitized. The possibility that such changes are adaptive for the parasite has been controversial, because some alterations may be incidental byproducts of the parasite’s effects on its host [1]. Other changes, however, are well designed to promote the survival of the parasite, and are thought to represent manipulation of the host to the parasite’s advantage [2–5].
Ichneumonid wasps in the tribe Polysphinctini are ectoparasites of spiders (Gauld 1995) , [6] and several species in the “Polysphincta clade” (hereafter “polysphinctine wasps”) modify the web construction behavior of their hosts [7, 8]. After growing slowly for a week or more as it feeds on the spider’s hemolymph (and apparently not affecting its host’s behavior), the larva induces the spider to build a modified, “cocoon” web. The larva then kills and devours its host, builds a cocoon attached to the cocoon web, and pupates. Cocoon webs built by spiders appear to improve the chances of survival of the wasp’s cocoon [7, 9–11].
Nonetheless, the author backtracks in order to preserve his evil-utionary dogma:
Spiders never survive to reproduce once their behavior is altered, so cocoon web construction has probably evolved under selection on the larva rather than the spider.
Comment