[Rev. Edward Clement]

Re: The E=mc² hoax

Actually, you are all wrong. E=mc² only applies to objects that are not moving.

So now you are saying that light does not move. You atheists are so tossed about.

No friend, we are never wrong because Jesus is always right!"

Numbers
23:19 God is not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do it? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good?

[Russell Holbeck]

Re: The E=mc² hoax

Actually, you are all wrong. E=mc² only applies to objects that are not moving. The correct equation for objects with momentum, which is velocity times mass, is E²=(mc²)²+((mv)c)².

Hello Blendmaster345.

I thought objects were always moving.

Thank you.

Rusty

[WilliamJenningsBryan]

Re: The E=mc² hoax

Actually, you are all wrong. E=mc² only applies to objects that are not moving. The correct equation for objects with momentum, which is velocity times mass, is E²=(mc²)²+((mv)c)².

Light has no mass you goofball, that's what we've been talking about. Your equation might work for calculating what happens when you drunkenly wrap your car around a light pole, and it might explain why objects with mass have a hard time reaching the speed of light - but it contributes nothing to the discussion going on in this thread.

Read the thread - and hopefully your Bible (KJV1611).

[MilitantImbecile]

Re: The E=mc² hoax

Actually, you are all wrong. E=mc² only applies to objects that are not moving. The correct equation for objects with momentum, which is velocity times mass, is E²=(mc²)²+((mv)c)².

Energy=Mass X The speed of light squared

So by simple algebra

C^2 = Energy/Mass

So the more energy you put into something, the less mass it will have. But you say that it doesn't involve movement?

[Albert The Lunkhead (On Moderation)]

Re: The E=mc² hoax

E=mc² is Einstein's famous formula which asserts that the energy (E) which makes up the matter in any body is equal to the square of the speed of light (c²) times the mass (m) of that body. It is a meaningless, almost nonsensical, statement that purports to relate all matter to light. In fact, no theory has successfully unified the laws governing mass (i.e., gravity) with the laws governing light (i.e., electromagnetism), and numerous attempts to derive E=mc² in general from first principles have failed. Political pressure, however, has since made it impossible for anyone pursuing an academic career in science to even question the validity of this nonsensical equation. Simply put, E=mc² is liberal claptrap.

Biblical Scientific Foreknowledge predicts that a unified theory of all the laws of physics is impossible, because light and matter were created at different times, in different ways, as described in the Book of Genesis.

Mass is a measure of an object's inertia, in other words its resistance to acceleration. In contrast, the intrinsic energy of an object (such as an atom) is a function of electrostatic charge and other non-inertial forces, having nothing to do with gravity. Declaring the object's energy to be a function of inertia rather than electrostatics is an absurd and impossible attempt to unify the forces of nature, contrary to Biblical Scientific Foreknowledge.

For more than a century, the claim that E=mc² has never yielded anything of value. Often it seems to be used as a redefinition of "energy" for pseudo-scientific purposes, as by the lamestream media. There have been attempts to find some justification for the equation in already understood processes involved in nuclear power generation and nuclear weapons, and in the speculation about antimatter.

Source: http://www.conservapedia.com/E%3Dmc%5E2

I'm assuming you have never studied Mathematics or Physics? There's so much proof for this equation. If you want more proof, look at the atomic bomb.

Einstein was a Jew.

Oh, look, a christian being nice in his own way.

Everyone knows, light is instantaneous.

Nope. Seems only unintelligent people like you believe that. You can even calculate the speed of light at home.

Seriously, if these 'scientists' really want people to buy into their little lies, they should at least make them plausible.

Lies?! Without science we wouldn't be using social media right now, nor other technologies we use in our dally lives. Together with understand the universe, earth etc. etc. You really need to look into your own belief, asking yourself whether it's lies, before moaning about science.

No kidding!

The very idea is silly! I mean, I was told by one scientist that the stars I was looking at was 11 million "light years" away. He told me that means it took light 11 million years to reach me. I turned to him and asked, "I'm looking at this light right now; do you really think I'm 11 million years old?"

What a goof!

You're saying he's a goof? Have you seen what you've just posted?

NOTHING in the Holy Bible is fake!

Very debatable.

[James Hutchins]

Re: The E=mc² hoax

I'm assuming.........Lies?! Without science we wouldn't be using social media right now, nor other technologies we use in our dally lives. Together with understand the universe, earth etc. etc. You really need to look into your own belief, asking yourself whether it's lies, before moaning about science.
......
Very debatable.

O f course you are 'assuming', that is the very foundation of cluelessness, way to go!

Friend, I could care less about Kim Kardashian'ss Clitter and any other utterance of people on social media. All that matters is what God thinks, not Snookie.

Science is 'theory' (guesses) and the Bible is facts. You should get them straight before you look even more foolish and narrow minded.

[Albert The Lunkhead (On Moderation)]

Re: The E=mc² hoax

Science is 'theory' (guesses) and the Bible is facts. You should get them straight before you look even more foolish and narrow minded.

Wrong. You should get them straight before you look even more foolish and narrow minded. A scientific theory is MUCH different than a theory used in common terms. It will first become an hypothesis. Those hypotheses will undergo lots of experimental trials and observations and data is collected. Over time, as more and more data is collected, a hypothesis becomes a scientific theory. A scientific theory is NOT a guess - we have evidence. The fact is that a scientific theory means it is much closer to being a scientific truth than an educated guess.

You people believe in the Bible because you were indoctrinated into the belief by their families and that's what they are told to believe, period! The Bible is not fact, but fiction. They are just myth stolen from older religions. The fact that London exists does not prove Harry Potter exists. The fact that any other historical event in the bible is not proof of the bible's claim of the divine. The Bible needs evidence, something you are all ignoring.

[James Hutchins]

Re: The E=mc² hoax

Wrong. You should get them straight before you look even more foolish and narrow minded. A scientific theory is MUCH different than a theory used in common terms. It will first become an hypothesis. Those hypotheses will undergo lots of experimental trials and observations and data is collected. Over time, as more and more data is collected, a hypothesis becomes a scientific theory. A scientific theory is NOT a guess - we have evidence. The fact is that a scientific theory means it is much closer to being a scientific truth than an educated guess.

You people believe in the Bible because you were indoctrinated into the belief by their families and that's what they are told to believe, period! The Bible is not fact, but fiction. They are just myth stolen from older religions. The fact that London exists does not prove Harry Potter exists. The fact that any other historical event in the bible is not proof of the bible's claim of the divine. The Bible needs evidence, something you are all ignoring.

Sorry friend. 'Evidence' is not a fact. 'Evidence' is like saying because my head got wet, it must be raining. What if I went swimming? Took a shower? No friend, you are still guessing with your extremist 'theories'. Facts, facts are irrefuttable. Facts as recorded by observers there at the time of the event. Facts in the Bible.

[Albert The Lunkhead (On Moderation)]

Re: The E=mc² hoax

you are still guessing with your extremist 'theories'

How are we 'guessing'?

[Bubba McRightman]

Re: The E=mc² hoax

I ain't never been good at that math stuff and I know it was just Jesus protecting me from all the commie lies.

The answer is simple: God said "let their be light" and there was light. Period. He told my wife to move her fat ass out the way first but the light was already there long before Einstein came around to try and debunk God's word.

This Einstein guy is now a charcoal briquet in Hell's BBQ.

[Ezekiel Bathfire]

Re: The E=mc² hoax

IMG]http://www.designboom.com/weblog/images/images_2/rodrigo/august/trillion_frame_camera/light04.gif[/IMG]

researchers at the MIT media lab in America have developed a new camera system that processes visual data at a rate of one trillion
frames per second. the technology is capable of detecting light travel,

So... we have got an amazingly fast camera and a lot of guys who know about photography... Just like CGI and Star Wars, isn't it? In fact it it so similar, a reasonable person would conclude that it is merely a trick.

Note how the light stops just as it enters the bottle - that's where they got it wrong.

[Albert The Lunkhead (On Moderation)]

Re: The E=mc² hoax

Sorry friend. 'Evidence' is not a fact.

Evidence is used to back up what you are trying to prove and strong evidence is the facts. So, yes, in some cases, evidence is facts. But what is derive, conclude, assume, postulate from the factual observations/evidence may have a strong or a week connection.

Evidence is like saying because my head got wet, it must be raining.What if I went swimming? Took a shower?

Not really. The evidence is your head is wet. The rain, the show or the swimming are the possible reasons why your head got wet.

No friend, you are still guessing with your extremist 'theories'.Facts, facts are irrefuttable...

Do you know what others facts are. Another fact is that people like you, who do not like what scientific theories tell them, will just make up fake definitions, like your definition of evidence. Then, you will use these fake definitions to try and convince themselves that theories are not valid.

Scientific theories are NOT guesses. They are not fact either, though the evidences/observation/data used may be facts. Nevertheless, it is fair to say that a theory is correct if it is based on reliable data.

Facts as recorded by observers there at the time of the event.

Have you ever looked at the studies of how different observers record the same events? That is why science uses quantifiable measurements.

Facts in the Bible

What facts?

I ain't never been good at that math stuff and I know it was just Jesus protecting me from all the commie lies.

Well, that's logic What's your evidence is is Jesus protecting you from all the 'lies'? Also, what lies are you talking about in the first place?

The answer is simple: God said "let their be light" and there was light. Period.

It's not that simple.

He told my wife to move her fat ass out the way first...

You're a nice Christian. If I was your wife, I would divorce you, so I could be free from your evil.

but the light was already there long before Einstein came around to try and debunk God's word.

And Einstein achieved well. That's why he is one of the most famous person who ever lived.

This Einstein guy is now a charcoal briquet in Hell's BBQ.

You have no positive evidence.

Just like CGI and Star Wars, isn't it?

No.

In fact it is so similar, a reasonable person would conclude that it is merely a trick.

No, it's science. A reasonable person would conclude it isn't a trick.

Note how the light stops just as it enters the bottle - that's where they got it wrong.

Congratulations! You've clearly shown that you have no idea how science works.

[Bubba McRightman]

Re: The E=mc² hoax

Well, that's logic What's your evidence is is Jesus protecting you from all the 'lies'? Also, what lies are you talking about in the first place?

The lies of MATH! It don't say nuthin 'bout math in the bible! Math is a man-made heathen practice, spawned with demon seed in the uterus of man.

E=MC2 looks more like a satanic symbol than this LOL "math" stuff anyways. Your "math" has falsely led you to believe that the earth is billions (LOL) of years old and that I was once a monkey and somehow was changed into a God fearing man of the cross.

What witchcraft do you subscribe to? I wish it were 1692 again and we were in Salem, Mass. You would be THE main attraction at the marshmallow roast!

[Stephenh]

Re: The E=mc² hoax

The lies of MATH! It don't say nuthin 'bout math in the bible! Math is a man-made heathen practice, spawned with demon seed in the uterus of man.

E=MC2 looks more like a satanic symbol than this LOL "math" stuff anyways. Your "math" has falsely led you to believe that the earth is billions (LOL) of years old and that I was once a monkey and somehow was changed into a God fearing man of the cross.

What witchcraft do you subscribe to? I wish it were 1692 again and we were in Salem, Mass. You would be THE main attraction at the marshmallow roast!

You obviously don't know math, and don't know your Bible.

1 Kings 7:23 - And he made a molten sea, ten cubits from the one brim to the other: [it was] round all about, and his height [was] five cubits: and a line of thirty cubits did compass it round about.

[Pim Pendergast]

Re: The E=mc² hoax

You obviously don't know math, and don't know your Bible.

1 Kings 7:23 - And he made a molten sea, ten cubits from the one brim to the other: [it was] round all about, and his height [was] five cubits: and a line of thirty cubits did compass it round about.

The verse you just quoted proves that secular mathematics is wrong. According to the Bible, pi = 3, not 3.14159. If scientists are using flawed math in their calculations, then their conclusions will be wrong, which is why we can't trust dating methods.