World’s smartest man debunks secular archaeology and history

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: World’s smartest man debunks secular archaeology and history

Good, so, real statistics, which are not falsified, from scientists created your computers, cars, planes, trains, phones, Televisions and every electronic object you use on a daily basis.

You seem to have a mistaken impression that I do not recognize we live in a world of Order and Beauty, that everything must be chaotic and random and senseless. That is the argument of evolutionists, dear, not me.

[ScienceisforFools]

Re: World’s smartest man debunks secular archaeology and history

False statistics don't form computers because they won't form anything.

Good, so, real statistics, which are not falsified, from scientists created your computers, cars, planes, trains, phones, Televisions and every electronic object you use on a daily basis.

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: World’s smartest man debunks secular archaeology and history

And these false statistics didn't form your computers, cars, planes, trains, phones, Televisions and every electronic object you use on a daily basis.

Where's your proof? I mean, you can believe in whatever fantasy world you want with your own imagined reality, but if you want me to believe you, I am going to need some actual proof that you aren't some crazy idiot. Some do that, rarely. You know how we KNOW some do that? Because other scientists find their mistakes and/or dishonesty, and point it out. And here's the fun part: the scientific method is self-correcting, so that if one (or even many) scientists act dishonestly, their dishonesty will be discovered and discarded. How about that.

Don't be obtuse. False statistics don't form computers because they won't form anything. They'll be argued about, paraded on the cover of prideful magazines like "Science" and "Nature," and people will go to conferences to rub elbows with similarly deluded individuals. The Truth©, however, will always come out. A few examples for your consideration:

• Both man and woman possess the seed of life (Genesis 3:15) discovered by man in 17th century
• Earth is held in place by invisible forces (Job 26:7) discovered by man in 1650
• Blood is necessary for life (Leviticus 17:11) discovered by man in 19th century
• Oceans have natural paths in them (Psalms 8:8) discovered by man in1854
• Light is a particle and has mass (a photon) (Job 38:19) discovered by man in 1932
• Stars give off signals (Job 38:7) discovered by man in 1945
• Oceans contain fresh water springs (Job 38:16) discovered by man in 1920
• Dust is important to survival (Isaiah 40:12) discovered by man in 1935
• Hubert Spencer's scientific principles (Genesis 1) discovered by man in 1820
• Air has weight (Job 28:25) discovered by man in the 16th century
• Light can be split up into component colors (Job 38:24) discovered by man in 1650
• Matter is made up of invisible particles (Romans 1:20) discovered by man in 20th century
• Water cycle (Ecclesiastes 1:7) discovered by man in 17th century
• Lightning and thunder are related (Job 38:25) discovered by man in 19th century

[ScienceisforFools]

Re: World’s smartest man debunks secular archaeology and history

they falsify statistics to secure funding and hopeful fame.

And these false statistics didn't form your computers, cars, planes, trains, phones, Televisions and every electronic object you use on a daily basis.

Where's your proof? I mean, you can believe in whatever fantasy world you want with your own imagined reality, but if you want me to believe you, I am going to need some actual proof that you aren't some crazy idiot. Some do that, rarely. You know how we KNOW some do that? Because other scientists find their mistakes and/or dishonesty, and point it out. And here's the fun part: the scientific method is self-correcting, so that if one (or even many) scientists act dishonestly, their dishonesty will be discovered and discarded. How about that.

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: World’s smartest man debunks secular archaeology and history

They use evidence to support their claims.

You're mistaken dear; they falsify statistics to secure funding and hopeful fame.

If he knew more than we do today, why didn't he tell us the information about what he knew? HE'S MEAN!

But he did, friend! This information can be found in the Biblical books of Ecclesiastes, Proverbs, and Song of songs.

[ScienceisforFools]

Re: World’s smartest man debunks secular archaeology and history

People put so much stock into modern day scientists

They use evidence to support their claims.

but they can't hold a candle to the wisdom of God,

Prove God.

And to think, King Solomon didn't even need to go to some fancy college to gain all this knowledge. He never heard of the Large Hardon Collider, or life on Mars, or gave a thought as to what particles make up the universe. He never knew about this so-called "germ theory," or the idea of washing one's hands before preparing food. He never knew about all the things people go to college to learn.

According to your Bible, he wasn't smarter, but wiser. There's a difference.

He was wiser than anyone who ever lived, or ever will live. As indicated by this scripture.

1 Kings 3:11-12

New King James Version (NKJV)

11 Then God said to him: “Because you have asked this thing, and have not asked long life for yourself, nor have asked riches for yourself, nor have asked the life of your enemies, but have asked for yourself understanding to discern justice, 12 behold, I have done according to your words; see, I have given you a wise and understanding heart, so that there has not been anyone like you before you, nor shall any like you arise after yo

He knew the Truth© about so many things, and he knew more than any man alive before or since.

If he knew more than we do today, why didn't he tell us the information about what he knew? HE'S MEAN!

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: World’s smartest man debunks secular archaeology and history

[FONT=Verdana]
1 Kings 3:12 tells us Solomon’s wisdom will never be surpassed. Solomon was the wisest man who ever lived – except, of course, Jesus (Mat 12:42). It’s good to know we Christians have the world’s smartest man on our side. No secular scientist or historian or archaeologist will ever match Solomon’s wisdom. We have examples of Solomon’s astounding wisdom in the Bible. He once threatened to chop a baby in half to settle a maternity dispute (1 Ki 3:16-28). What’s the need for DNA testing? He came to the conclusion that 0.1% of all men are virtuous but 0% of all women are virtuous (Eccl 7:28).

This is such a good point. People put so much stock into modern day scientists and philosophers, but they can't hold a candle to the wisdom of God, the kind of wisdom Solomon had in abundance. And to think, King Solomon didn't even need to go to some fancy college to gain all this knowledge. He never heard of the Large Hardon Collider, or life on Mars, or gave a thought as to what particles make up the universe. He never knew about this so-called "germ theory," or the idea of washing one's hands before preparing food. He never knew about all the things people go to college to learn. He knew the Truth© about so many things, and he knew more than any man alive before or since.

[ScienceisforFools]

Re: World’s smartest man debunks secular archaeology and history

History and archaeology are as incompatible with the Bible and as great a threat as evolution is.

Evolution a threat? Why's that? Because it contradicts the Bible? Evolution is a facts.

Yet Christians shouldn’t be worried.

You probably should because science is improving every day.

These fields of study can be easily debunked in the light of God’s Word.

First you have to prove they are the word of God.

It’s good to know we Christians have the world’s smartest man on our side.

It's good to know we scientist have the world's smartest man on our side. Albert Einstein, Issac Newton, Galileo Galilei, Charles Darwin, Stephen Hawking etc.

No secular scientist or historian or archaeologist will ever match Solomon’s wisdom.

No Christian God or myth will ever match these people.

Archaeologists would have us believe man’s origins were very primitive. Man was nomadic and used stone tools for perhaps hundreds of thousands of years. Farming developed in only relatively recent times, perhaps 10,000 years ago. Eventually people began living in cities, and crafts such as stonemasonry began to emerge. Man learned to make bronze tools and later iron tools. Ridiculous timescale aside, all this malarkey conflicts with the Bible

Maybe it's time to put the Bible down, then.

Human life always has been and always will be pretty much the same.

Are you really that stupid?

If you disregard the modern age, Solomon’s words are 100% accurate and destroy the very foundations of secular history and archaeology. Why should historians bother reading old manuscripts? There’s no remembrance of the past. Why should archaeologists bother digging up ancient artefacts? They won’t find that things were significantly different in the past. The world’s wisest man said so. [/FONT]

Sorry but the ramblings of a highly superstitious man who lived long before the birth of information and knowledge, in no way debunks volumes of data gathered by archeologists since the Age of Reason.

“Were you there?”

This is such a stupid argument. If we used this logic how could we prove murders. This is so asinine. I didn't witness JFK being assassinated, but that's the conclusion the evidence leads to. I wasn't there when George Washington become the first president of the United States, but the evidence leads to conclude that historical count most probably accurate. Were you there when Jesus was resurrected? The different between religion and science is the things that we weren't present for, science relies on evidence to lead us to the best possible conclusions about religion relies on something other than evidence because they don't have evidence; faith this the excuse people give when they have no good reason for their beliefs - if you have a good reason, you wouldn't need faith.

[Pim Pendergast]

It is a widely-held myth among pseudo-Christians that history and archaeology confirm the accuracy of the Bible. But historians would have us believe Egyptian chronology disproves the Flood account – as if written records of Middle-Eastern kings written thousands of years ago could possibly be reliable. And archaeologists would have us believe Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and Moses are mythical figures and the Exodus from Egypt and conquest of Canaan never happened. History and archaeology are as incompatible with the Bible and as great a threat as evolution is. Yet Christians shouldn’t be worried. These fields of study can be easily debunked in the light of God’s Word.

1 Kings 3:12 tells us Solomon’s wisdom will never be surpassed. Solomon was the wisest man who ever lived – except, of course, Jesus (Mat 12:42). It’s good to know we Christians have the world’s smartest man on our side. No secular scientist or historian or archaeologist will ever match Solomon’s wisdom. We have examples of Solomon’s astounding wisdom in the Bible. He once threatened to chop a baby in half to settle a maternity dispute (1 Ki 3:16-28). What’s the need for DNA testing? He came to the conclusion that 0.1% of all men are virtuous but 0% of all women are virtuous (Eccl 7:28).

Let’s pit Solomon’s wisdom against the fields of history and archaeology. Archaeologists would have us believe man’s origins were very primitive. Man was nomadic and used stone tools for perhaps hundreds of thousands of years. Farming developed in only relatively recent times, perhaps 10,000 years ago. Eventually people began living in cities, and crafts such as stonemasonry began to emerge. Man learned to make bronze tools and later iron tools. Ridiculous timescale aside, all this malarkey conflicts with the Bible, which tells us the first generation of humans were farmers (Gen 4:2) and built cities (Gen 4:17) and by the seventh generation humans had mastered nomadic herding (Gen 4:20), invented music (Gen 4:21) and discovered brass and iron – at the same time (Gen 4:22)! In short, history and archaeology teach that man progressed from nomadic to civilized, from using primitive stone technology to bronze to iron. The Bible, however, teaches that man has always farmed and been civilized and that nomadism was a much later development (Gen 4:20). Solomon in his wisdom confirms man’s technological stasis.

Eccl 1:9-11
9 The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun.
10 Is there any thing whereof it may be said, See, this is new? it hath been already of old time, which was before us.
11 There is no remembrance of former things; neither shall there be any remembrance of things that are to come with those that shall come after.

Effectively, Solomon was saying, “While I don’t know what happened in the past (v11), I do know that it was basically the same as the present (v10) and that history repeats itself (v9).” He knew man had never made any significant discoveries or advancements and never would. Human life always has been and always will be pretty much the same. Yet we today live in an age of rapid technological advancement. We have probably all witnessed great changes in our lifetime. Does this in any way discount Solomon’s words of wisdom? Of course not! We live in the last times, a time when knowledge shall be increased (Dan 12:4). If you disregard the modern age, Solomon’s words are 100% accurate and destroy the very foundations of secular history and archaeology. Why should historians bother reading old manuscripts? There’s no remembrance of the past. Why should archaeologists bother digging up ancient artefacts? They won’t find that things were significantly different in the past. The world’s wisest man said so.

Next time someone tries to tell you primitive humans lived in caves and used stone tools, just ask them, “Were you there?” Direct them to the words of Solomon, and be sure to inform them he was the wisest man ever. Then explain to them the past cannot be remembered, yet we know it was always like it was till just before the modern age.