[Basilissa]

Re: Knights Templar - an Upper Echelon of Christian Brotherhood? Tool of Satan? Neither?

Perhaps. I had never associated carpooling and homersexuality. I do wonder, now, which comes first - buying the Prius or butt piracy. Thanks to God, I'll never give another thought, to either.

I think it's a sort of a bundle: atheism, communism, prius-driving, carpooling, eating organic non-GMO food, trying to "save" the planet (instead of saving own soul), liberalism, and homosexuality. I suppose for different people different aspect of it come first, but they all end up in a bundle.

[Rodrigo]

Re: Knights Templar - an Upper Echelon of Christian Brotherhood? Tool of Satan? Neither?

I'm confused. Is that a trick question? Aren't all "earth-saving" carpoolers hellbound liberal homosexuals?

Perhaps. I had never associated carpooling and homersexuality. I do wonder, now, which comes first - buying the Prius or butt piracy. Thanks to God, I'll never give another thought, to either.

So, in conclusion: Knights Templar (and templates) are to be avoided. Thank you, all, for your collective wisdom.

[Basilissa]

Re: Knights Templar - an Upper Echelon of Christian Brotherhood? Tool of Satan? Neither?

What is the meaning - early homerism (with armor; first account of safe sex?)? Or simply the first car-poolers?

I'm confused. Is that a trick question? Aren't all "earth-saving" carpoolers hellbound liberal homosexuals?

[Rodrigo]

Re: Knights Templar - an Upper Echelon of Christian Brotherhood? Tool of Satan? Neither?

Quoted for the Truth™.

(Even though they were a devil-worshiping, homosexual version of Blackwater)

Perhaps, Sister, perhaps. I, too, am vexed by the 2-men-on-a-horse symbol. What is the meaning - early homerism (with armor; first account of safe sex?)? Or simply the first car-poolers?

[Basilissa]

Re: Knights Templar - an Upper Echelon of Christian Brotherhood? Tool of Satan? Neither?

I don't know how Holy they were, but if we'd let the Knights Templar finish the job 900 years ago, we wouldn't have had to fight the Muslims today. They were basically the medieval version of Blackwater.

Quoted for the Truth™.

(Even though they were a devil-worshiping, homosexual version of Blackwater)

[WWJDnow]

Re: Knights Templar - an Upper Echelon of Christian Brotherhood? Tool of Satan? Neither?

I don't know how Holy they were, but if we'd let the Knights Templar finish the job 900 years ago, we wouldn't have had to fight the Muslims today. They were basically the medieval version of Blackwater.

[Basilissa]

Re: Knights Templar - an Upper Echelon of Christian Brotherhood? Tool of Satan? Neither?

Thank you for the history lesson link, Sister. So, John the Baptist would have been the first Baptist? (John 3:3)

Exactly.

[Rodrigo]

Re: Knights Templar - an Upper Echelon of Christian Brotherhood? Tool of Satan? Neither?

Wrong. Baptists have always existed. The history was written by our enemy, that's why we were largely ommitted.

Thank you for the history lesson link, Sister. So, John the Baptist would have been the first Baptist? (John 3:3)

[Back against wall]

Re: Knights Templar - an Upper Echelon of Christian Brotherhood? Tool of Satan? Neither?

You will be happy to know that I found some Templates for you. Maybe you will like this one my dear messycan unshaven armpit. There are so many.



You're Welcome .. warmly.

[Basilissa]

Re: Knights Templar - an Upper Echelon of Christian Brotherhood? Tool of Satan? Neither?

T
My history knowledge is limited, but isn't it accuratish to say that, at that time (~1100 AD) the RCC was nearly the only game in town, i.e. the "true Christians" were a largely disjointed (on the human level) group, disbursed throughout Europe and Asia? So, any organized body would have at its power/basis/funding from the RCC.

Wrong. Baptists have always existed. The history was written by our enemy, that's why we were largely ommitted.

[Rodrigo]

Re: Knights Templar - an Upper Echelon of Christian Brotherhood? Tool of Satan? Neither?

Weren't the knights templar some sort of catholic operation?

and right there at the 40 second mark,

Year Established . . 1119
Founded by: . . . . . . .Hugues de Payens
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Godfrey de Saint-Omer

so I looked them up:



Hugues de Payens
A papist toady. I won't link to the catholic encyclopædia but there's plenty of fawning to be found in there. Next:



Godfrey de Saint-Omer


..which meant I also needed to look up "Poor Fellow-Soldiers of Christ and of the Temple of Solomon" and sure enough


Looking through a few sources all I got was papism papism papism pope pope pope you could almost smell the holy water not to mention blasphemous nuns, Bible denying friars, lying priests & sozzled monks brainwashing children to coerce them, when adults, to fund their simony. Nevertheless, the temple knights did oppose marauding hordes who had their eyes on Europe and America which at this time was a Viking colony administered from Greenland so who knows? Did they prevent America from conversion to the false prophet? Were the savages spared from Mohammed so that the message of Salvation could one day be preached? Or did they open the doorway for popish adventures across the new world. An adventure requiring the declaration of independence in God's Name to dislodge. But even so, there still seem to be a lot of Romish idolators on the map.

Obviously I don't intrude opinions in my posts but am happy to post this map so others may decide for themselves or, preferably, ask the Pastors who will explain the correct position.

Jeremiah 3:15 I will give you pastors according to mine heart, which shall feed you with knowledge and understanding. kjv

Genesis 1:27-28a God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply. kjv

Thank you, Mitza, for your legwork on this. Yes, the genesis of these "Knights" seems to be Saint Bernard, who acted as a mediator when two popes were competing for papal supremacy.

My history knowledge is limited, but isn't it accuratish to say that, at that time (~1100 AD) the RCC was nearly the only game in town, i.e. the "true Christians" were a largely disjointed (on the human level) group, disbursed throughout Europe and Asia? So, any organized body would have at its power/basis/funding from the RCC.

Yet, I agree with the others' posts, here - the RCC roots, secrecy, and symbol of two men sharing a horse, are troubling. I am not interested in sharing a saddle, with any man, figuratively or literally.

Thanks, All. I believe I will pass, for now, on the invitation.

[Back against wall]

Re: Knights Templar - an Upper Echelon of Christian Brotherhood? Tool of Satan? Neither?

I thoght everyone knew that these Templates pushed the poops poop. I honestly thought everyone knew this?
I would advise against researching this, because it's in code. But it is widely known that Leonardo da Vinci (a turtle?) claimed that upon Christs return, Christ would be a Woman

[Youth Minister Harry]

Re: Knights Templar - an Upper Echelon of Christian Brotherhood? Tool of Satan? Neither?

My Lord! This bareback conspiracy drills deeper than I would have imagined in my wildest fantasies!

[WilliamJenningsBryan]

Re: Knights Templar - an Upper Echelon of Christian Brotherhood? Tool of Satan? Neither?

You're right, MitzaLizalor! How disgusting! Those two men are clearly dressed like Catholicks!

They apparently were founded by French Freemasons (according to some) - which would almost guarantee that they were gay. One look at that seal, with two men bare backing on a horse, would not leave any doubt to most sensible people.

There are others that suggest that the diabolical cathylick Jesuits are at the root of all this as well.

[Youth Minister Harry]

Re: Knights Templar - an Upper Echelon of Christian Brotherhood? Tool of Satan? Neither?

You're right, MitzaLizalor! How disgusting! Those two men are clearly dressed like Catholicks!