[Pastor Isaac Peters]

Re: oh my god

so pastor isaac, if the bible said that 2*2=5 you would believe it, right? that's pretty simple-minded, believing in what ever you are said, are you aware of the fact that bible might be worng? or AT LEAST wrong translated? and don't come with that nonsence that it was written in english because it cracks me up every time i hear it.

We certainly won't believe everything (or just about anything) that you say, since we're aware that it could be (and almost always is) wrong. Are you happy now?

stop believing in what other people are telling you and start using your own heads, that is was god gave you it for! you're not in medievil anymore, so stop acting like that.

So you know more about God's intentions than He does?

[Bambi]

Re: oh my god

oko then smart guy, if you actually believe everything what bible says, then you also believe that at the beginning there were only 2 human being, adam an eve, right? then tell me something why in the hell does bible not tell us about dinosaurs? and you CAN'T deny the existence of dinosaurs.

And please don't tell me that devil "summoned" the bones into the soil bla bla bla.

have you ever heard of evolution?

[Pastor Al E Pistle]

Re: oh my god

oko then smart guy, if you actually believe everything what bible says, then you also believe that at the beginning there were only 2 human being, adam an eve, right? then tell me something why in the hell does bible not tell us about dinosaurs? and you CAN'T deny the existence of dinosaurs.

And please don't tell me that devil "summoned" the bones into the soil bla bla bla.

have you ever heard of evolution?

Why can't you shut up about things you know nothing about....which seems to be EVERYTHING!

Dinosaurs in the Bible

[Bambi]

Re: oh my god

that's bullshit, that article says that dinosaurs, eve and adam lived at the same time, which is impossible. There were no "first" human being, they have developped from creatures similar to apes. This theory is scientifically proven.

[Pastor Al E Pistle]

Re: oh my god

that's bullshit, that article says that dinosaurs, eve and adam lived at the same time, which is impossible. There were no "first" human being, they have developped from creatures similar to apes. This theory is scientifically proven.

If it were proven, IT WOULDN'T BE A THEORY.

Are you REALLY that stupid? The THEORY of evolution is not the LAW of evolution, you silly teenage fool!

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: oh my god

oh and to your wikipedia article about martin luther, every single teacher would bitch-slap you for using wikipedia, since EVEN people like you are allowed to post stuff there. I know my german history just as you know american history. I'm not trying to teach you anything about your history so don't try to teach me about mine.

Would you prefer this:

http://www.humanitas-international.org/showcase/chronography/documents/luther-jews.htm

Perhaps you'd prefer this source:

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/anti-semitism/Luther_on_Jews.html

Maybe this:

http://www.outreachjudaism.org/luther1543new.html

Stop lying to defend your hate-mongering monster of a hero.

every single man who treats his brother or sister like animals should be locked up. I wish i had the chance to meet at least one of you, i would show you how it feels like to be treated like that.

Did you know that making terrorist threats online is a felony?

oko then smart guy, if you actually believe everything what bible says, then you also believe that at the beginning there were only 2 human being, adam an eve, right? then tell me something why in the hell does bible not tell us about dinosaurs? and you CAN'T deny the existence of dinosaurs.

And please don't tell me that devil "summoned" the bones into the soil bla bla bla.

Look up "Behemoth" and "Leviathan" and "dragon" in the Bible. Dinosaurs are brought up repeatedly, but people like you, who hate God, refuse to read the book to see the words on the page.

have you ever heard of evolution?

Yes. Can you show me the missing link?

No? I thought not.

[eliot mayfield]

Re: oh my god

that's bullshit, that article says that dinosaurs, eve and adam lived at the same time, which is impossible. There were no "first" human being, they have developped from creatures similar to apes. This theory is scientifically proven.

Hmm, I recall seeing on National Geographic after extensive testing they even pinpointed the location Adam came from.

[Thinkforyourself]

Re: oh my god

If it were proven, IT WOULDN'T BE A THEORY.

Are you REALLY that stupid? The THEORY of evolution is not the LAW of evolution, you silly teenage fool!

You obviously have no idea what the hell you are talking about. The theory of evolution is truest theory we know. Only an idiot or someone who is completely irrational would deny the evidence for evolution in order to sustain their stupid beliefs in something which has no basis on solid fact.

I must ask you if you are one of the "Young Earth" creationist who believe the earth was made six thousand years ago (or whatever, don't care for the precise amount) I bet you believe those fossils are there...because...uh..THE DEVIL PUT THEM THEIR TO TEST OUR FAITH. YEAH. THAT'LL WORK.

And, @the missing link comment...are you seriously asking scientists to produce every single transitional fossil in history? Good luck. That's a pathetic argument.

[Pastor Al E Pistle]

Re: oh my god

You obviously have no idea what the hell you are talking about. The theory of evolution is truest theory we know. Only an idiot or someone who is completely irrational would deny the evidence for evolution in order to sustain their stupid beliefs in something which has no basis on solid fact.

I must ask you if you are one of the "Young Earth" creationist who believe the earth was made six thousand years ago (or whatever, don't care for the precise amount) I bet you believe those fossils are there...because...uh..THE DEVIL PUT THEM THEIR TO TEST OUR FAITH. YEAH. THAT'LL WORK.

And, @the missing link comment...are you seriously asking scientists to produce every single transitional fossil in history? Good luck. That's a pathetic argument.

You sure are a piece of work. You blast in here and start running your mouth without having a clue. SATAN didn't stack bones around to test our faith. What a stupid idea. The dinosaurs were alive and well and did the heavy lifting to help Noah and his two sons build the ark. But they were too big to be taken aboard, so they drowned in the flood.

The best theory we have is gravity. It's called a law because we can measure it's effects, but we don't know what causes it. Oh sure, opponents of inference to the best explanation often raise the objection that theories that give us the best explanation of some phenomena need not be the most probable ones. And they are certainly right. But what can we conclude from this insight? Should we ban thought from theory choice and work instead, for example, with a Bayesian approach? This would be a mistake brought about by a certain misapprehension of the epistemological task. We have to think about the real aims of epistemology and scientific practice in order to see that we are not primarily interested in the most probable theories but in explanatory ones leading to a coherent model of our world.

I think YOU are the one who doesn't know what they are talking about.

[Thinkforyourself]

Re: oh my god

You sure are a piece of work. You blast in here and start running your mouth without having a clue. SATAN didn't stack bones around to test our faith. What a stupid idea. The dinosaurs were alive and well and did the heavy lifting to help Noah and his two sons build the ark. But they were too big to be taken aboard, so they drowned in the flood.

The best theory we have is gravity. It's called a law because we can measure it's effects, but we don't know what causes it. Oh sure, opponents of inference to the best explanation often raise the objection that theories that give us the best explanation of some phenomena need not be the most probable ones. And they are certainly right. But what can we conclude from this insight? Should we ban thought from theory choice and work instead, for example, with a Bayesian approach? This would be a mistake brought about by a certain misapprehension of the epistemological task. We have to think about the real aims of epistemology and scientific practice in order to see that we are not primarily interested in the most probable theories but in explanatory ones leading to a coherent model of our world.

I think YOU are the one who doesn't know what they are talking about.

Oh wow, this is a doozy.

To start off, you have no proof whatsoever of, ahaha, dinosaurs helping to build Noah's Ark, which ALSO has no evidence of existing at all. You then go on to claim that the dinosaurs were too big to fit on the boat, which is quite humorous because you seem to believe that all dinosaurs were massive. Of course satan putting those fossils there is ridiculous, but some old dude building a big boat out of wood with dinosaurs helping him and then fitting two of every species of animal on it and sustaining them for fourty days is completely rational. Right.

http://www.dinosaurtypes.net/images/home_page/DinosaursRef.gif

You can see in the picture right there that some of those weren't that much bigger than an elephant.

Mass attracts mass. That is an observable effect. Animals evolve over time. Also an observable effect, and one that is, PERIOD, the best explanation we have. Creationism doesn't come close. I don't see a problem with a probable theory that explains our world...

[Pastor Al E Pistle]

Re: oh my god

Oh wow, this is a doozy.

To start off, you have no proof whatsoever of, ahaha, dinosaurs helping to build Noah's Ark, which ALSO has no evidence of existing at all. You then go on to claim that the dinosaurs were too big to fit on the boat, which is quite humorous because you seem to believe that all dinosaurs were massive. Of course satan putting those fossils there is ridiculous, but some old dude building a big boat out of wood with dinosaurs helping him and then fitting two of every species of animal on it and sustaining them for fourty days is completely rational. Right.

http://www.dinosaurtypes.net/images/home_page/DinosaursRef.gif

You can see in the picture right there that some of those weren't that much bigger than an elephant.

Mass attracts mass. That is an observable effect. Animals evolve over time. Also an observable effect, and one that is, PERIOD, the best explanation we have. Creationism doesn't come close. I don't see a problem with a probable theory that explains our world...

Now you are merely arguing for the sake of argument. If you want to play that game, you have no proof that time exists outside our invention of it, nor that it always points in one direction. I have here on my desk, two large Neodymium magnets. Very massive. I cannot put them even CLOSE to one another. They repel. So mass doesn't attract mass PERIOD. You had better come up with something that makes sense, PERIOD. Right now you are just babbling. How many animals have you watched evolve? Oh.....NONE? I do not consider the reproductive cycle of moths to be evolution, and I don't see any 'partial' evolutions.

I'm sorry, but I have had a tiring day and I hate arguing with someone so close-minded and full of hate as you are. Are you a racist too, or just stupid? Wait! Don't answer. I'll have someone more experienced in dealing with someone on your level of the food chain tomorrow. I can't be bothered.

[Thinkforyourself]

Re: oh my god

Now you are merely arguing for the sake of argument. If you want to play that game, you have no proof that time exists outside our invention of it, nor that it always points in one direction. I have here on my desk, two large Neodymium magnets. Very massive. I cannot put them even CLOSE to one another. They repel. So mass doesn't attract mass PERIOD. You had better come up with something that makes sense, PERIOD. Right now you are just babbling. How many animals have you watched evolve? Oh.....NONE? I do not consider the reproductive cycle of moths to be evolution, and I don't see any 'partial' evolutions.

I'm sorry, but I have had a tiring day and I hate arguing with someone so close-minded and full of hate as you are. Are you a racist too, or just stupid?

Yet again, you are blathering bullshit all over the place. I know that time is just a measuring system, but this has no relation to the argument at hand. And, you are obviously displaying your lack of the basic rules of physics. There are multiple forces acting on your two magnets. Gravity is pulling them down, the table is pushing them up, you are forcing them together while a magnetic force is pushing them apart. The magnetic force just happens to be stronger than the force you can apply on the two magnets. Also, way to completely contradict yourself when earlier you stated that gravity is a law and then turn around and say that mass doesn't attract mass. That's exactly what gravity is.

I admit, I haven't personally seen an animal evolve, but scientists have determined they have after studying the physical evidence presented to them through the natural world. It's completely mind-boggling how ignorant you are of the basic facts of evolution.

[Thinkforyourself]

Re: oh my god

I'm sorry, but I have had a tiring day and I hate arguing with someone so close-minded and full of hate as you are. Are you a racist too, or just stupid? Wait! Don't answer. I'll have someone more experienced in dealing with someone on your level of the food chain tomorrow. I can't be bothered.

Silly me, I forgot to respond to this piece of work (Not that it necessarily deserves it)

No, I'm not stupid, and not a racist. This basic name calling is not becoming of you, and leads me to believe that you are like a wounded animal trapped in a corner, lashing out in any way possible. Pathetic.

Always remember, if you can't refute someones arguments, attack the person individually! Works like a charm, and only makes you look like an immature little brat.

[Thinkforyourself]

Re: oh my god

Holy shit I can't believe how stupid I am.

I have found the light, praise Jesus!

[Nobar King]

Re: oh my god

There is always room for redemption in Jesus' heart.