[Blind leading the blind]

Re: Can you explain this picture, Rachel?

Sorry if I was trained to type fast so that I could finish my work in Computer Apps. before the bell rang! We had a crudload of stuff to do in that class.

[WilliamJenningsBryan]

Re: Can you explain this picture, Rachel?

I find it's better to take your time and type correctly than to type quickly and make many errors. Who knows what you could accidentally say by mistake?

This one is known as an idiot savant. She has mastered the art of test taking and, on first glance, may appear to be intelligent, but is really a feckless imbecile.

We may seem harsh on these matters, but all that come to Landover acquire some Jesus in them a leave a better person.

[Jonathan H. Dona]

Re: Can you explain this picture, Rachel?

So most of the time my spelling sucks! When you type fast like, I do it happens.

I find it's better to take your time and type correctly than to type quickly and make many errors. Who knows what you could accidentally say by mistake?

[Blind leading the blind]

Re: Can you explain this picture, Rachel?

So most of the time my spelling sucks! When you type fast like, I do it happens.

[Mrs. Mary Whitford]

Re: Can you explain this picture, Rachel?

Special Ed. just means that the children in it have special needs, wether they are ahead of their class or behind it. (Personally, I learned to write when I was three.)

I don't know if anyone who can't spell "whether" should be proud of the fact that they have the spelling skills of a three-year-old.

[Blind leading the blind]

Re: Can you explain this picture, Rachel?

Special Ed. just means that the children in it have special needs, wether they are ahead of their class or behind it. (Personally, I learned to write when I was three.)

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Can you explain this picture, Rachel?

Special Ed can also be for the gifted (smart) kids.

Riiiight. You keep telling yourself that.

[Blind leading the blind]

Re: Can you explain this picture, Rachel?

Special Ed can also be for the gifted (smart) kids.

[The Jabba Master]

Re: Can you explain this picture, Rachel?

I've worked with mentally challenged kids before, and most of them didn't even know what a computer was, let alone how to use it. But you have a point. He could be regarded as retarded. I don't know him in real life, and he could be in Special Ed classes.

Even if i was in Special ed Classes dosent mean im retarded.

[Miss Hikari]

Re: Can you explain this picture, Rachel?

I am sorry Miss Hikari, but your own argument is bosh. I didn't say that he only had an IQ of 25.

I simply said that being unable to do basic ablutions was not a good example of being retarded.

People able to do much more than that can still be regarded as retarted. Different authorities use different figures but up to an IQ of 75 could be considered as retarded.

I said that your example was too restrictive. Not that the retard here only had an IQ of 25.

You have twisted my argument about 180 degrees to suit yourself.

No, someone can do much more than you suggested and still be retarded, hence we are correct in referring to him as a retard. And I suspect that he gets help with using the computer anyway.

I've worked with mentally challenged kids before, and most of them didn't even know what a computer was, let alone how to use it. But you have a point. He could be regarded as retarded. I don't know him in real life, and he could be in Special Ed classes.

[Enobarbus]

Re: Can you explain this picture, Rachel?

No, no, no.. It takes more than an IQ of 25 to turn on a computer, connect ot the internet, type in www.landoverbaptist.net, log in, enter a thread and post in it. So... Your case is null and void, Eno, dear.

I am sorry Miss Hikari, but your own argument is bosh. I didn't say that he only had an IQ of 25.

I simply said that being unable to do basic ablutions was not a good example of being retarded.

People able to do much more than that can still be regarded as retarted. Different authorities use different figures but up to an IQ of 75 could be considered as retarded.

I said that your example was too restrictive. Not that the retard here only had an IQ of 25.

You have twisted my argument about 180 degrees to suit yourself.

No, someone can do much more than you suggested and still be retarded, hence we are correct in referring to him as a retard. And I suspect that he gets help with using the computer anyway.

[Enobarbus]

Re: Can you explain this picture, Rachel?

Your moderators and administrators have a right to monitor posts but not to shut me up completly. This is not property, this is the internet and that is covered under the first amendment, just like the press and other media.

You are talking nonsense. This is our forum and we can ban you, edit you, and do whatever we like to your posts, and you have no legal comeback.

This is our forum. It is not subject to the US constitution in the sense that you seem to believe it is. If you think that you can say what you like in US newspapers you are also deluded. The newspapers are allowed -- because of the constitution -- to put views contrary to those of the government. That is what free speech means. It doesn't mean you or the editors can say what you like in the newspapers.

I promise you that Internet forums are property. Internet ISPs and other providers often ban people, or remove material they don't like or agree with.

And the Internet is not under US legislation. I am certainly not. I am resident in New Zealand, and if you keep this up I will personally ban you just to make the point. Who are you going to appeal to for redress? The US supreme court? The local police?

Please talk sense.

If you started a forum of your own then you would have more freedom, but even then the ISP could shut you down if they chose to.

This certainly is property and it certainly is not covered by the first amendment. It's not even under US jurisdiction.

[Mrs. Mary Whitford]

Re: Can you explain this picture, Rachel?

*Pokes Temp with lightsaber*

Retardation is no excuse for homerism.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Can you explain this picture, Rachel?

You couldn't work either if you couldn't do anything other than sit in a recliner and be in pain all day! That's what herniated disks in the back does!

#1) If you'd stop cramming your gob with twinkies all day long and get off your fat ass and lose some weight, you might actually find a job.

#2) If you'd pray to Jesus to accept you, all of your pain and troubles would be instantly relieved. Click on the Paypal button for more details.

[AncientFireRisen]

Re: Can you explain this picture, Rachel?

What, she has back problems, so she can't sit in front of a computer and use photoshop any more? Is your sister a negress, by any chance?

I knew Kublai Khan provided a pleasuredome, but I never knew God provided freedomes. Care to back that up with chapter and verse?

So how do Christians talk about God?

Not talking about GOD is a mistake.
Deuteronomy 6:6 And these words, which I command thee this day, shall be in thine heart:
7 And thou shalt teach them diligently unto thy children, and shalt talk of them when thou sittest in thine house, and when thou walkest by the way, and when thou liest down, and when thou risest up.
If you want to offend God by disobeying His instructions, that's your prerogative (do tards know what that word means? If not, it's a bit like a freedome), but don't expect us to do the same.

I have shown you that God wants us to discuss his Glory and not avoid the subject. Do you know what happens when people make God angry by disobeying Him? It's not very peaceful.

You couldn't work either if you couldn't do anything other than sit in a recliner and be in pain all day! That's what herniated disks in the back does!