[Hank]

Re: A Challenge to Our Intelligence.

We have driven off the Jew with his Jew lies. True Christians™ are prepared for this kind of thing, since the Bible warns us that Jews are liars:

For there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers, specially they of the circumcision: Whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole houses, teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre's sake. Titus 1:10-11

What a wonderful God we serve! He has warned us beforehand... I'm in tears brother, thank you for the wonderfully accurate Bible verse. What a God we worship! What a friend we have in Jesus!

[WWJDnow]

Re: A Challenge to Our Intelligence.

We have driven off the Jew with his Jew lies. True Christians(TM) are prepared for this kind of thing, since the Bible warns us that Jews are liars:

For there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers, specially they of the circumcision: Whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole houses, teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre's sake. Titus 1:10-11

[Hank]

Re: A Challenge to Our Intelligence.

Christianity ∞

Is Christianity a double barrell shotgun?

[WWJDnow]

Re: A Challenge to Our Intelligence.

Christianity 1
Joodaism 0

Christianity ∞
Judaism 666

[Patriarch Jon]

Re: A Challenge to Our Intelligence.

When that Sabbath was over, which in Israel is at sunset, the same gospel writer sends some women to the tomb with the purpose to anoint Jesus' body. The man had probably forgotten the guards to prevent the approach of any suspect.

The women had one thought in mind only: Who would remove the tombstone. No one thought about how to fight the soldiers to approach the tomb. Obviously they would know they were there. Evidently, the three days they were supposed to watch the tomb turned out to be one.

When the women got there the place was deserted. Instead of the guards, the author reports about an earthquake, when an angel came down from heaven and removed the stone; but the women could not do their job, because there was no one in the tomb; Jesus was not there. Even the angel had been cheated out of being an eyewitness.

The women were guided by their faith. For no other reason they went to the tomb. Any person inspired by faith would know the words of the scriptures were true.

[Hank]

Re: A Challenge to Our Intelligence.

Glorius Rebuttal

Christianity 1
Joodaism 0

[Brother V]

Re: A Challenge to Our Intelligence.

I believe the answer that the Jew is looking for is that the New Testament is not a factual first hand account of the events that happened during that blessed week. That the New Testament (at least the books of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John) were put together several years later and were not first hand accounts of the events.

So then I turn the question back on our hebrew bretheren.

Why wasn't Joshua and all his people put to death for breaking the Sabbath when they walked around Jericho for 7 days straight? (Joshua 6)

Where are the books "the chronicles of the kings of judah" "the chronicles of the kings of Israel"?

If you are worried about first hand testimony of events, then who was the writer of the early parts of Genesis? Was that person around or was that the story passed down? If it was passed down, then how did Moses (who was raised an Egyptian) learn them?

If God gave Genesis to Moses the way he wanted the story told, then how come the same can't be true of the New Testament?

YIC
V

[Hank]

Re: A Challenge to Our Intelligence.

Well, the Scriptures says that "Only for his own guilt shall a man be put to death." That's in Deuteronomy 24:16. How could have Jesus died for the sins of another?

The Bible also says:

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. (John 3:16)


See, we have to read the whole Bible in context. The Bible is the only interpreter of the Bible. You can't just pull out random verses without understanding the context and then try to use them to support your twisted beliefs. What would you know anyway, your a Joo.

[WWJDnow]

Re: A Challenge to Our Intelligence.

Well, the Scriptures says that "Only for his own guilt shall a man be put to death." That's in Deuteronomy 24:16. How could have Jesus died for the sins of another?

Jesus was executed under Roman law, not under God's law. No Christian would have executed Him, for He was without Sin.

You are not serious!

Your sniveling Jew remarks don't make the truth any less the truth, even in big blue type. I notice you didn't have a response to my proof that Jesus was not entombed on the Sabbath. So, Jew, why did you lie to us about that?

[WickedWitch]

Re: A Challenge to Our Intelligence.

You are not serious!

Oh yes they are! The Landoverites are dead serious about their beliefs. They are here for one purpose and one purpose only: to spread the Truth about their (and incidentally your) god's word. It's usually shocking for most, as it is for you, because they've never truly heard what this god teaches, but I assure you - this is Christianity in its purest form. You wanted to learn about Christianity, right? Well this is it! You might not like it, but this is it. Believe me, Benny, they're serious.


Now, don't get me wrong, I don't agree with them, although I do support them in their cause (don't try make sense of it, I can't even make sense of it!), and I have nothing against Judaism (as a matter of fact, Judaism is the only Abrahamic religion with which I don't have a problem). But you asked if they were serious and they are. You asked for Christianity and you got it.

[Ben Masada]

Re: A Challenge to Our Intelligence.

OK, on to your other Jew lies:

Priests were not allowed to touch dead bodies, except those of close family members. Nowhere does the Bible say that priests could not enter a graveyard. That's just a stupid rule the rabbis made up long after Jesus's death to keep the priests in line, because the rabbis were turning Judaism into a religion of rabbi-worship, and the priests were resisting.

The gospel writer didn't send them, they sent themselves.

Obviously??? Why would they have had reason to believe there were Roman soldiers there? They weren't there when the priests asked Pilate to post guards, were they? They didn't visit the tomb in the meantime, did they? It's obvious that they would not have known about the guards.

There was an earthquake and an angel of the Lord came down to unseal the tomb, revealing that it was empty. The guards then rushed off to tell the priests what happened. They hardly would have stopped because they saw a couple of Jewish women nearby.

That's a total non-sequitur. This wasn't about putting on a show for an angel, it was about the redemption of mankind from Sin.

That's ludicrous. You honestly expect us to believe that the soldiers didn't bother to examine the tomb's contents before they sealed it?

You'd be surprised how little it takes to insult the intelligence of a Mormon--a little booze and a couple of brass plates and they'll rush off to start a new religion--but that's irrelevant to our discussion, don't you think? As for the story, what would you have said if you were a priest? Tell everyone an angel came to take Christ's body? Once you Jews murdered Him, it's no surprise that you started lying about it to cover your asses. And why do you say that Mary and Mary Magdalene didn't see the soldiers at the tomb? The Bible doesn't say that.

How could intelligent Jews reject Jesus? That's proof positive that you're not as intelligent as you think.

Hey, don't ask us to explain your Jew lies.

Again, that's a Jew lie you're asking us to explain. The most likely explanation is that they hopped on the next galley out of Judea before Pilate could catch up with them--that's what I would have done if the priests had just paid me a bundle to tell everyone I was asleep on my watch.

Glad you mentioned Josephus as an authority, since he accepted Christ as his Savior.

Yes. Accept Jesus as your personal Lord and Savior before it's too late, Jew.

You are not serious!

[Ben Masada]

Re: A Challenge to Our Intelligence.

He isn't trying to have an intelligunt conversation Reverend, he is just here to troll the forums. He wouldn't know what a conundrum is if it came and bit him in his big fat non-pork eating hiny.

Listen up Joo, Jesus died for your sins and you spit in His face? Repent, sinner! Be washed in the blood of the lamb and then post a video of you on youtube eating pork to prove that you have indeed converted.

Well, the Scriptures says that "Only for his own guilt shall a man be put to death." That's in Deuteronomy 24:16. How could have Jesus died for the sins of another?

[Ben Masada]

Re: A Challenge to Our Intelligence.

Oh, no. I think I drove the Jew off. I hope not, because I wanted to tell him how much we support Israel as that embattled country works to free itself from the Muslim invaders and reclaim the land that God gave to the Jewish people by building settlements in the Palestinian-occupied territories.

No, you haven't yet. I am still around. But my point is to discuss about Jesus and not politics.

[JennyD]

Re: A Challenge to Our Intelligence.

Oh, no. I think I drove the Jew off. I hope not, because I wanted to tell him how much we support Israel as that embattled country works to free itself from the Muslim invaders and reclaim the land that God gave to the Jewish people by building settlements in the Palestinian-occupied territories.

You've got that right, Brother! We will never abandon Israel!

[WWJDnow]

Re: A Challenge to Our Intelligence.

Oh, no. I think I drove the Jew off. I hope not, because I wanted to tell him how much we support Israel as that embattled country works to free itself from the Muslim invaders and reclaim the land that God gave to the Jewish people by building settlements in the Palestinian-occupied territories.