[Jo Freddie]

Re: The only one true Religion

I can make up things like that also Jo Freddie. Would you like to me to do one for you.

Anyone can go and find an original copy of the 1611 version and check for themselves, they will see I have made nothing up.

[Lisa H]

Re: The only one true Religion

Compare what I have highlighted in your quote with what the 1611 verson ACTUALLY says:
[ATTACH]14074[/ATTACH]

I can make up things like that also Jo Freddie. Would you like to me to do one for you.

[Jo Freddie]

Re: The only one true Religion

I bet you think you're pretty slick Io Freddie.

Care to point out any differences between the 1611 and 1769 translations other than spelling or printing differences?

I am not the one making the claim that the 1611 version is perfect and all others are inferior.

[Jo Freddie]

Re: The only one true Religion

I am not quoting the 1769 version Jo Freddie. Have you been eating those Alphabet noodles and mixed up the letters.

1611 Version
Matthew 1:21 And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins.

Later version
Matthew 1:21 And she will bring forth a Son, and you shall call His name JESUS, for He will save His people from their sins.”

Compare what I have highlighted in your quote with what the 1611 verson ACTUALLY says:

[Lisa H]

Re: The only one true Religion

I am not trying to confuse anyone, you are the one that belongs to a church that only accepts the 1611 version, yet you quote the 1769 version.

Why do you quote the 1769 version Lisa?

I am not quoting the 1769 version Jo Freddie. Have you been eating those Alphabet noodles and mixed up the letters.

1611 Version
Matthew 1:21 And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins.

Later version
Matthew 1:21 And she will bring forth a Son, and you shall call His name JESUS, for He will save His people from their sins.”

[Lycia The Repentant]

Re: The only one true Religion

I bet you think you're pretty slick Io Freddie.

Care to point out any differences between the 1611 and 1769 translations other than spelling or printing differences?

[Jo Freddie]

Re: The only one true Religion

You are just making this up to confuse people. It must be lonely for you living in your state of confusion all the time.

So when are you going to be a Christian?

I am not trying to confuse anyone, you are the one that belongs to a church that only accepts the 1611 version, yet you quote the 1769 version.

Why do you quote the 1769 version Lisa?

[Lisa H]

Re: The only one true Religion

No if you care to check what the 1611 version actually says you will find those two verses are:

Matthew 1:18 Now the birth of Iesus Christ was on this wise: When as his mother Mary was espoused to Ioseph (before they came together) shee was found with childe of the holy Ghost.

Matthew 1:21 And she shall bring forth a sonne, and thou shalt call his Name Iesus: for hee shall saue his people from their sinnes.

You are just making this up to confuse people. It must be lonely for you living in your state of confusion all the time.

So when are you going to be a Christian?

[Jo Freddie]

Re: The only one true Religion

OK alfredo-head, answer me this. If somebody translated your holy cookbook into French, would it still be as valid?

If the Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster or The Loose Canon were to be translated into any language they would be valid.

BUT that is not what Landlubber claims about the KJV 1611 bible, it is perfect and any translation of it is inferior. To read it in its perfect form we are told you must read the original 1611 text, not the 1769.

[Lisa H]

Re: The only one true Religion

But neither are perfect. Neither are what our names actually are. I am told that your special book is perfect and can be read as it is, and as it is, the son of "god" is called Iesus

Jo Freddie stop with your silliness. Did you have another bad batch of noodles?

[Jo Freddie]

Re: The only one true Religion

What are you bleating about. Of course it is. Did you put your eye patch on the wrong eye today!

Here is another one.

Matthew 1:21 And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins.

No if you care to check what the 1611 version actually says you will find those two verses are:

Matthew 1:18 Now the birth of Iesus Christ was on this wise: When as his mother Mary was espoused to Ioseph (before they came together) shee was found with childe of the holy Ghost.

Matthew 1:21 And she shall bring forth a sonne, and thou shalt call his Name Iesus: for hee shall saue his people from their sinnes.

[Lycia The Repentant]

Re: The only one true Religion

OK alfredo-head, answer me this. If somebody translated your holy cookbook into French, would it still be as valid?

[Jo Freddie]

Re: The only one true Religion

Actually Io Freddie, we can see that changing one letter in a name did not result in a different name. If it HAD, you would have been completely confused by the words "Io Freddie" and would not have understood I was talking to you. Just like how I can understand you are referring to me when you refuse to spell my name correctly and insist on calling me "Lycra".

But neither are perfect. Neither are what our names actually are. I am told that your special book is perfect and can be read as it is, and as it is, the son of "god" is called Iesus

So is the 1611 version and the son of "god" called Iesus?
or
Is the 1611 imperfect and the son of "god" is called Jesus?

[Lisa H]

Re: The only one true Religion

Lisa that is not from the KJV-1611.

What are you bleating about. Of course it is. Did you put your eye patch on the wrong eye today!

Here is another one.

Matthew 1:21 And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins.

[Jo Freddie]

Re: The only one true Religion

Stop being a silly pirate Jo Freddie. Have you been eating too many sheep pellets without drinking water.


Matthew 1:18 Now the birth of Jesus Christ was on this wise: When as his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child of the Holy Ghost.

Lisa that is not from the KJV-1611.