[Joanna Lytton-Vasey]

Re: SHOULD BREAST-FEEDING BE CONSIDERED AS PEDOPHILIA ?

Umm...everyone in the bible was Jewish..

Well not everyone, because there were Greeks, Romans, Egyptians, etc..

That's not clarification, dear. That's contradiction. I know American isn't your first language, so I do hope that helps?


But if you'll take a word of advice, from one silly woman to another, do try not to be rude about Sister Mary Etheldreda. It's unlikely to end well for you.


All the very best, dear,
JL-V

[Mei Saeki]

Re: SHOULD BREAST-FEEDING BE CONSIDERED AS PEDOPHILIA ?

What I said isn't nonsense, you silly woman. I was clarifying what I said so Mrs. Mary's teeny brain wouldn't get confused.

[Joanna Lytton-Vasey]

Re: SHOULD BREAST-FEEDING BE CONSIDERED AS PEDOPHILIA ?

Well not everyone, because there were Greeks, Romans, Egyptians, etc..

So basically, what you said was complete nonsense? Never mind, dear, count yourself lucky that Sister Mary Etheldreda is here to set you right!

[Mei Saeki]

Re: SHOULD BREAST-FEEDING BE CONSIDERED AS PEDOPHILIA ?

Well not everyone, because there were Greeks, Romans, Egyptians, etc..

[Mei Saeki]

Re: SHOULD BREAST-FEEDING BE CONSIDERED AS PEDOPHILIA ?

Yes they actually were. The term 'Christian' didn't come until the New Testament, before that everyone was referred to as Israelites, forgive me for saying Jews (as Jews were only called that if they were from the Tribe of Judah).

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: SHOULD BREAST-FEEDING BE CONSIDERED AS PEDOPHILIA ?

Umm...everyone in the bible was Jewish..

Umm... no they weren't.

The Christians were, umm... Christian.

Starting with, umm...

[Mei Saeki]

Re: SHOULD BREAST-FEEDING BE CONSIDERED AS PEDOPHILIA ?

Umm...everyone in the bible was Jewish..

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: SHOULD BREAST-FEEDING BE CONSIDERED AS PEDOPHILIA ?

Forgive me for not finding this verse earlier, or remembering about it really.The man Elkanah and all his house went up to offer to the Lord the yearly sacrifice and to pay his vow. But Hannah did not go up, for she said to her husband, “As soon as the child is weaned, I will bring him, so that he may appear in the presence of the Lord and dwell there forever.” Elkanah her husband said to her, “Do what seems best to you; wait until you have weaned him; only, may the Lord establish his word.” So the woman remained and nursed her son until she weaned him. And when she had weaned him, she took him up with her, along with a three-year-old bull, an ephah of flour, and a skin of wine, and she brought him to the house of the Lord at Shiloh. And the child was young. It says she nursed! Which means breastfeeding and she did so until he could eat real food.

You're taking moral advice from an ancient, illiterate, flea-ridden Jewess now?

[Mei Saeki]

Re: SHOULD BREAST-FEEDING BE CONSIDERED AS PEDOPHILIA ?

Forgive me for not finding this verse earlier, or remembering about it really.The man Elkanah and all his house went up to offer to the Lord the yearly sacrifice and to pay his vow. But Hannah did not go up, for she said to her husband, “As soon as the child is weaned, I will bring him, so that he may appear in the presence of the Lord and dwell there forever.” Elkanah her husband said to her, “Do what seems best to you; wait until you have weaned him; only, may the Lord establish his word.” So the woman remained and nursed her son until she weaned him. And when she had weaned him, she took him up with her, along with a three-year-old bull, an ephah of flour, and a skin of wine, and she brought him to the house of the Lord at Shiloh. And the child was young. It says she nursed! Which means breastfeeding and she did so until he could eat real food.

[Des]

Re: SHOULD BREAST-FEEDING BE CONSIDERED AS PEDOPHILIA ?

As of 2013 the FBI definition of rape is penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.

The nipple is a secondary sex organ, and just like the drunken college sluts who scream rape after they willingly pass out and are incapable of consenting, a baby is incapable of giving consent.

Therefore, by the definition accepted by the FBI, the mother is raping her baby every time she breastfeeds. If you disagree with this, you disagree with the FBI's definition of rape and by that admit that college girls are sluts who lie about rape.

[Nahkriin]

Re: SHOULD BREAST-FEEDING BE CONSIDERED AS PEDOPHILIA ?

Ugh, to think that my own mother might have done this when I was an infant disgusts me! I don't see how a mother could force something so sickening, and sinful on their own child.

[Mary Etheldreda]

Re: SHOULD BREAST-FEEDING BE CONSIDERED AS PEDOPHILIA ?

Breast milk contains the proper nutrients for babies to grow.

That's just what the sickular scientists want you to believe. In reality, breastfeeding is a matter of forcefully injecting a nipple directly into the unsuspecting mouth of a infant, beginning the life-long brainwashing that supports the Gay Agenda. Girls, because they dream of becoming lesbians. Boys because they become dependent upon whatever satisfies their increasingly out-of-control lust and licentiousness.

[Mei Saeki]

Re: SHOULD BREAST-FEEDING BE CONSIDERED AS PEDOPHILIA ?

The scripture means in a sexual way!

[Mei Saeki]

Re: SHOULD BREAST-FEEDING BE CONSIDERED AS PEDOPHILIA ?

Breast milk contains the proper nutrients for babies to grow. If you don't breastfeed you are depriving your baby form growing.

[WickedWitch]

Re: SHOULD BREAST-FEEDING BE CONSIDERED AS PEDOPHILIA ?

I'm sure you would be happy to discuss it, you depraved harlot. We're not here to help you get your jollies.

Doesn't matter, anyway, since I no longer have private messaging privileges.


Update: I was going to post this 510 seconds ago but couldn't. So instead I have all this time to fill and I'm gonna fill it by just adding to this post. It's all completely irrelevant to the thread and couldn't be more off topic if I tired, but that's okay with m: I've got all these minutes to fill and I've gotta fill'em somehow, right?


Update 2: Oh no, still have 246 more seconds to go. What am I gonna do with myself for 4 minutes? I suppose I'll just keep stream-of-consciousness typing. I could be spending time with my beautiful baby, enjoying the pure joy of a baby's laugh, but instead I'm killing time waiting to post.

Update 3: oh goody, only 15 more seconds before I can post! I shall simply bounce with delight!