[James Dewitt]

Re: Nominations for Freehold Man of the Year

If someone here is better than others, morally speaking, how can you all be True Christians™ then? Does the KJV say anything about this?

God bless,

sas

Morally speaking all the men of Freehold are above reproach. Some of us go the extra mile in our civic duties. A few of us where very helpful in the realm of politics. Earlier this year we had an election for Mayor, and a few men helped out by making sure that the best person for the job was elected( Farley might I add). We had a few undesirable candidates running for the office.
It would not be fitting to have lets say a Nigra or a Homersexural as Mayor of Freehold.
A few of us contributed a lot of money and time to a certain Mayors campaign.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Nominations for Freehold Man of the Year

I'm pretty sure I've won.


Where's my check?

[Mrs. Mary Whitford]

Re: Nominations for Freehold Man of the Year

I've already nominiated my husband, Mr. Whitford, but would like to show further proof that he should win - Freehold's newest health club for men, The Taut Christian.

[James Dewitt]

Re: Nominations for Freehold Man of the Year

I'm pretty sure I've won.


Where's my check?

Pastor there is no check, just a plaque and the title. I am sorry to tell you again, but Pastors and Reverends are not allowed.

I've already nominiated my husband, Mr. Whitford, but would like to show further proof that he should win - Freehold's newest health club for men, The Taut Christian.

He is a fine man. Why have I not heard any response about my application?

[self_abusing_sinner]

Re: Nominations for Freehold Man of the Year

Nice guys finish last. That disqualifies you lot, because you're all eager to finish first and/or trash talk the others.

sas -Putting the 'modest' back in Holy Bible Study

[James Dewitt]

Re: Nominations for Freehold Man of the Year

Nice guys finish last. That disqualifies you lot, because you're all eager to finish first and/or trash talk the others.

sas -Putting the 'modest' back in Holy Bible Study

In some small quaint village in England, every one is looking for the idiot that they lost. I think we found him.

[self_abusing_sinner]

Re: Nominations for Freehold Man of the Year

Sour losers are also automatically disqualified, since it univesally bespeaks of bad character.

Next.

sas

[Jo Freddie]

Re: Nominations for Freehold Man of the Year

Nice guys finish last. That disqualifies you lot, because you're all eager to finish first and/or trash talk the others.

sas -Putting the 'modest' back in Holy Bible Study

I don't think it does, as for a nice guy to win he would have to be eligible to be nominated, and the criteria for a valid nomination exclude anyone who is a nice guy.

This just leaves us with the existing nominations.

[self_abusing_sinner]

Re: Nominations for Freehold Man of the Year

I would like to disqualify Rev Jim Osmond, he apparantly had to change my name from self_aware_sinner to self_abusing_sinner. He did it because I questioned the Purity of a True Christian(tm). This is starting to look like the Third Reich, where people were persecuted and at the whims of the stasi, which the Americans so nobly fought and died to prevent, but which the True Christian(tm) Rev Jim Osmond sees fit to revive at his own leisure as he can't defend his own actions, in giving an inappropriate gift to a young girl still under her parents care, and protection.

He also said that he didn't know why he just didn't quarantine me right now, but it seems it would be a lot easier to answer this question, which you have been dodging all along, coward AND sinner.

Did you, Rev Osmond, entertain any unsavory or ungodly thoughts when you gave Felicity the gift of the Pediabear underwear, at all? And if so, which? Time to wade into the River Jordan and confess, and Jesus - your Lord and King - did before John the Baptist, and before everyone present.

I'm guessing you will chicken out instead, proving once and for all that you are not a True Christian(tm).

Regards,

the self_aware_sinner, who is tired of your childish games, especially from a sixty year old "Reverent", who should know BETTER.

[HTannor]

Re: Nominations for Freehold Man of the Year

..........This is starting to look like the Third Reich, where people were persecuted and at the whims of the stasi..............

Get thee to a history book, Einstein.

The commies of East Germany had the Stasi.

The Third Reich had the Gestapo.

[self_abusing_sinner]

Re: Nominations for Freehold Man of the Year

Also, I both find it infuriating and humorous that someone who at sixty-four has married a twenty-three year old, and who gives underwear to sixteen year old girls, has so little perspective on himself and others, that he calls someone else a pedophile without questioning his own self, motives, actions. This BETTER be senility or I swear to God, I am all the angels in Heaven will tear you a new one, Reverent.

And the True Christian(tm) whose Purity I questioned was, of course, Rev Osmond's own.

Amazing that a True Christian(tm) can't even look in the mirror and explain his actions to others. One would almost think it is a sham. This guy is making EVERYONE here look bad.

With the utmost seriousness, and respect.

sas, the self_aware_sinner

[Rev. Jim Osborne]

Re: Nominations for Freehold Man of the Year

Look you sassy pervert, get my name right for once: OSBORNE. Not Osmond. I'm not part of a talentless Mormon singing horror.

I'll answer your question truthfully as well: NO. I did not have any inappropriate thoughts or desires when giving Felicity her clothes. That has been what I've been trying to tell you all this time but you simply won't listen.

Son, I think what you need is to look in the mirror. You are nothing but a hypocrite who judges others (Matt. 7:1-5). Please remove the beam from your own eye before casting judgment on me in the future.

[Jo Freddie]

Re: Nominations for Freehold Man of the Year

I would like to disqualify Rev Jim Osmond, he apparantly had to change my name from self_aware_sinner to self_abusing_sinner. He did it because I questioned the Purity of a True Christian™. This is starting to look like the Third Reich, where people were persecuted and at the whims of the stasi,

Stasi - The Ministry for State Security was formed 9 February 1950 and was the official state security service of East Germany.

which the Americans so nobly fought and died to prevent, but which the True Christian™ Rev Jim Osmond sees fit to revive at his own leisure as he can't defend his own actions, in giving an inappropriate gift to a young girl still under her parents care, and protection.

He also said that he didn't know why he just didn't quarantine me right now, but it seems it would be a lot easier to answer this question, which you have been dodging all along, coward AND sinner.

Did you, Rev Osmond, entertain any unsavory or ungodly thoughts when you gave Felicity the gift of the Pediabear underwear, at all? And if so, which? Time to wade into the River Jordan and confess, and Jesus - your Lord and King - did before John the Baptist, and before everyone present.

I'm guessing you will chicken out instead, proving once and for all that you are not a True Christian™.

Regards,

the self_aware_sinner, who is tired of your childish games, especially from a sixty year old "Reverent", who should know BETTER.

SAS you are confusing a "True Christian™" with someone who is a nice person, The Rev Jimmy has acted consistently within the definition of a Landover "True Christian™"

[BelieverInGod]

Re: Nominations for Freehold Man of the Year

Look you sassy pervert, get my name right for once: OSBORNE. Not Osmond. I'm not part of a talentless Mormon singing horror.

I'll answer your question truthfully as well: NO. I did not have any inappropriate thoughts or desires when giving Felicity her clothes. That has been what I've been trying to tell you all this time but you simply won't listen.

Son, I think what you need is to look in the mirror. You are nothing but a hypocrite who judges others (Matt. 7:1-5). Please remove the beam from your own eye before casting judgment on me in the future.

Reverend, did you reject his advances? This seems to be his standard M.O. on this board, hit on you and then when you reject him, accuse you of every perverted thing under the sun. The people who know you, know that you didn't mean anything regarding the underwear. I worry about the sanity of someone who thinks that being polite is the same as hitting on someone, and there has to be an inappropriate motive to gift giving.

[self_abusing_sinner]

Re: Nominations for Freehold Man of the Year

Way to go putting everyone's fears to rest! Why can't you just man up and tell it like it was? The righteous are confident and the words in your post betrays a lack of that, so according to Holy Scripture, the Wisdom of Solomon, who knew that lies leads to viciousness and honesty to compassion, and found the right mother that way, you are NOT RIGHTEOUS.

In the future? In the FUTURE? I and WE are talking about RIGHT NOW.

And let me rephrase, so you don't think you can use any liberal Clintonesque loopholes, did you feel any unsavory or ungodly thoughts, impulse, motives, THE WORKS, when you gave Felicity her UNDERWEAR? With the DROOLING BEAR?

And, DID you abuse her parents trust in your position as a Reverent to give a gift that would have been returned if it was ANY other man???????

You're damn right I question you because I the clergy aren't questioned, it all becomes Catholicism. Would you agree on that?

You say in your profile that you fell from grace in the eighties. Are you doing so again? Do you need to take time out, go to a cave like Jesus did to battle the devil, and come back refreshed instead of marching blindly into what I at least perceive as perdition? God make it that I am wrong but if not, you have some spiritual work ahead of you, that can't be ignored or put of.

You know, as a Reverent, that stern words can be words of love. I hope you will take it that way.

Your servant,

sas, self_aware_sinner, and a helper to man