Originally posted by Romeo Rovagnati
View Post
X
-
-
Will you also write "100 reasons why we didn't vote for Jeb Bush despite loving his brother and father"?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: 100 reasons why the Bushes were better than Clinton and Obama
Originally posted by Dr. Anthony J. Toole View PostHow about these? They all got WORSE under Obama.
1. Death threats against the President.
2. Number of government shutdowns.
3. Failure to appoint Supreme Court nominees.
4. Keeping Guantanamo Bay open the longest.
5. Attacking Pakistan with 2 helicopters.
6. Many other things.
7. Etc.
That's just 7 off the top of my head. The must be many many more.
To me, # 7 is by far the worst. It reflects all the unknown evils perpetrated by this foreign-born usurper that will not be known for years. Perhaps even decades.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: 100 reasons why the Bushes were better than Clinton and Obama
How about these? They all got WORSE under Obama.
1. Death threats against the President.
2. Number of government shutdowns.
3. Failure to appoint Supreme Court nominees.
4. Keeping Guantanamo Bay open the longest.
5. Attacking Pakistan with 2 helicopters.
6. Many other things.
7. Etc.
That's just 7 off the top of my head. The must be many many more.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: 100 reasons why the Bushes were better than Clinton and Obama
I'm confused with the feature presentation. Is Obama a physician that is single-handedly increasing the overall health of America? If not, it's a non sequitur.
There have been 132 school shootings in America since Obama took office. The Bush administration saw only 48. If we are to accept that Obama is responsible for better quality of health in the country, we must by the same line of thought accept that he is responsible for the tripling in school shootings as well.
Leave a comment:
-
100 reasons why the Bushes were better than Clinton and Obama
The challenge has been issued:
“Name one “winner” of the Bushite wars, other than Iran, the Saudis and Bush-Cheney family companies.”Jesus.
Therefore also the 144,000 men who go to heaven. So I just named 144,001 winners.
That was a fun warmup, now for the feature presentation:
“Name one statistically significant and attributable metric of U.S. national health that improved across the span of either Bush administration.”In short, give one example of Obama being worse than Bush. I'm sure we can list 100.
Or: “Name more than a couple of statistically significant and attributable metrics of U.S. national health that did NOT improve dramatically across the span of either the Clinton or Obama administrations.”
I'll start:
1. Nasal Sex rate. I notice Democrats are suspiciously silent on the epidemic of nasal sex. They know whose fault it is.
2. Campus radicals at liberal-arts universities. This is completely unprecedented: who ever heard of 19-year-olds behaving like stupid hotheads? No other generation of teenagers has ever been quick to take offense, or had a desire try out stupid new things. This has to be Obama's fault, I bet he's putting hormones in the drinking water.
3. Your turn...
Leave a comment: