[Red Army]

Re: Leviathan. Satanist.

Žižek, get it right.

I like you, my misguided communist comrade. But you talk about Posada, when his name is Posadas. And then correct the English form of the last name of the pseudo communist Slavoj. The irony meter is about to explode here!


In this forum I have found the most straight forward Christians, the ones that follow the Bible. They are less dangerous than the hippie christians that support the Church while negating that their God is a hateful being.


When they say to me that communism is responsible for millions of deaths, I remind them that their God allegedly killed the entire human race but Noah and his family. The genocide Stalin looks like Heidi in the mountains besides the God described in the Bible.


But hey, even a trotskist have to agree that killing people is not only necessary and unavoidable, but a good thing giving the right circumstances. It is the circumstances what we disagree. I like when a Tzar is killed along with his children and wife, they like a beheaded homosexual.

[Dolores de Barriga]

Re: Leviathan. Satanist.

I think there is no reason to learn to read "uncritically." Becoming someone whom simply believes everything they read without a doubt... It seems like blind faith, and I am strongly against that. Yes, even when it comes to Satanism. I do not wish for anyone to blindly follow the Satanic Bible, just as the Christian Bible or else.

Then the next time you read it, look at the part that has a long list of deities. If I remember correctly, it calls them "demons," which is not a nice way to refer to ancient deities if you ask me. It's a long list and even without a background in history of religions you might be able to spot some inaccuracies. I recognized the great majority of the names and almost all of them were described/defined inaccurately. I understand the practice of plagiarizing stories and just plugging in own religion's names, but borrowing names while messing up their respective stories? That's a bit odd.

Ah, yes, Gilgamesh! While there was nothing I didn't agree with or so, or any faults at all in that sense, I didn't quite connect with it, if that makes sense? I must say I did not read it as thoroughly as I should have, though. If you have any interjections, care to enlighten me?

Sure. How about his meeting with Utnapishtim and the oldest account of the Flood - the original source from which the Biblical story was plagiarized? Also, I find the main theme of facing mortality/seeking immortality quite timeless, if you excuse the pun.

The Nuzi Tablets was something I thoroughly enjoyed,

Really? You find administrative/accounting notes and court documents enjoyable? I'm impressed! I'd be bored to death if I had to read through stuff like that. I definitely prefer read about epic adventures! Also, so you read cuneiform? Because I was not aware that the Nuzi tablets contents were published in English or another modern language.

And do not worry about "hectic" replies. Most of mine are. May I ask what you teach?

You may. Anthropology.

[Brother Gonzalez]

Re: Leviathan. Satanist.

piffle you, Human piece of trash.

Aaaaawwww, that means you do not like me?


I just love how christianphobia is just a post away with these liberals.

[Alvin Moss]

Re: Leviathan. Satanist.

As a Bisexual person... I hope you burn in the hell you speak of.

This is an example of the dangers of poor punctuation and structure. I am uncertain whether this person is saying he is bisexual and using poor structure and incorrect punctuation, or if he is accusing the Satan worshipper of being bisexual and using poor punctuation with faulty word selection and poor structure.

Speak up Mr. Redson; what are you trying to say.

[Didymus Much]

Re: Leviathan. Satanist.

Žižek, get it right.

No.

[Dick Redson]

Re: Leviathan. Satanist.

Ah, pardon? That's rather out of the blue.

Regardless, within Satanism, we don't believe in a hell, or afterlife. I assume this is misdirected, but if it isn't, heck, sure I will.

Yeah. I´m misdirected.

[leviathancross]

Re: Leviathan. Satanist.

As a Bisexual person... I hope you burn in the hell you speak of.

Ah, pardon? That's rather out of the blue.

Regardless, within Satanism, we don't believe in a hell, or afterlife. I assume this is misdirected, but if it isn't, heck, sure I will.

[Dick Redson]

Re: Leviathan. Satanist.

I think there is no reason to learn to read "uncritically." Becoming someone whom simply believes everything they read without a doubt... It seems like blind faith, and I am strongly against that. Yes, even when it comes to Satanism. I do not wish for anyone to blindly follow the Satanic Bible, just as the Christian Bible or else.

Hence, no, I did not read it as an absolute truth. I take everything with a grain of salt, as I think it is wise everyone does.

Ah, yes, Gilgamesh! While there was nothing I didn't agree with or so, or any faults at all in that sense, I didn't quite connect with it, if that makes sense? I must say I did not read it as thoroughly as I should have, though. If you have any interjections, care to enlighten me?

The Nuzi Tablets was something I thoroughly enjoyed, though I can't say if it's counted as a sacred text. But whether they're sacred or not, it was quite the ride. I found little error in that, so perhaps it would be my favourite? I am bad at pinpointing errors even a month after reading them, and it's probably been about two years. Time flies!

And do not worry about "hectic" replies. Most of mine are. May I ask what you teach?

Leviathan.

You have every right to your own opinion, however stupid and misguided it may be. What you do not have a right to is posting it on this forum, where you are a guest.


And I'm sure Mr. Zizec would not appreciate you putting his face on your ignorant hatred.

Žižek, get it right.

[Didymus Much]

Re: Leviathan. Satanist.

piffle you, Human piece of trash.

As a Bisexual person... I hope you burn in the hell you speak of.

You have every right to your own opinion, however stupid and misguided it may be. What you do not have a right to is posting it on this forum, where you are a guest.


And I'm sure Mr. Zizec would not appreciate you putting his face on your ignorant hatred.

[Dick Redson]

Re: Leviathan. Satanist.

I think there is no reason to learn to read "uncritically." Becoming someone whom simply believes everything they read without a doubt... It seems like blind faith, and I am strongly against that. Yes, even when it comes to Satanism. I do not wish for anyone to blindly follow the Satanic Bible, just as the Christian Bible or else.

Hence, no, I did not read it as an absolute truth. I take everything with a grain of salt, as I think it is wise everyone does.

Ah, yes, Gilgamesh! While there was nothing I didn't agree with or so, or any faults at all in that sense, I didn't quite connect with it, if that makes sense? I must say I did not read it as thoroughly as I should have, though. If you have any interjections, care to enlighten me?

The Nuzi Tablets was something I thoroughly enjoyed, though I can't say if it's counted as a sacred text. But whether they're sacred or not, it was quite the ride. I found little error in that, so perhaps it would be my favourite? I am bad at pinpointing errors even a month after reading them, and it's probably been about two years. Time flies!

And do not worry about "hectic" replies. Most of mine are. May I ask what you teach?

Leviathan.

As a Bisexual person... I hope you burn in the hell you speak of.

[Dick Redson]

Re: Leviathan. Satanist.

But the Bible says it has to be followed 100%. If you are not going to follow it 100%, what is the point of having a Bible?
Yes I support slavery, and I think homosexuals should be stoned to death. think that a raped woman deserves it, and that the rapist should marry the so-called victim. Of course, he has to pay the father of the slut.


That is written in the Bible, by God. God cannot be wrong. If I thought that God could be wrong, then He is not almighty, and He is not God. See the logic? believe 100% or don't believe at all. That is the real choice.


Unless you use religion as a shield from your fear of death. That way, you can invent your own religion for all I care. Just don't call yourself a Christian.


It is not the same with political views. Humans fail. God does not.

Fuck you, Human piece of trash.

[leviathancross]

Re: Leviathan. Satanist.

Right, so you read the Satanic Bible the same way Christians read the Holy Bible, as an absolute truth.

I suppose this is my main fault, I cannot unlearn to read critically. This is the main reason that makest impossible for me to become a True Christian™.


Really? What wrong do you find in, for example, Gilgamesh? Or is it another Mesopotamian work that you have read and find to be faulty?


I apologize for a hectic reply. I have to teach in 15 minutes, so I have to go!

I think there is no reason to learn to read "uncritically." Becoming someone whom simply believes everything they read without a doubt... It seems like blind faith, and I am strongly against that. Yes, even when it comes to Satanism. I do not wish for anyone to blindly follow the Satanic Bible, just as the Christian Bible or else.

Hence, no, I did not read it as an absolute truth. I take everything with a grain of salt, as I think it is wise everyone does.

Ah, yes, Gilgamesh! While there was nothing I didn't agree with or so, or any faults at all in that sense, I didn't quite connect with it, if that makes sense? I must say I did not read it as thoroughly as I should have, though. If you have any interjections, care to enlighten me?

The Nuzi Tablets was something I thoroughly enjoyed, though I can't say if it's counted as a sacred text. But whether they're sacred or not, it was quite the ride. I found little error in that, so perhaps it would be my favourite? I am bad at pinpointing errors even a month after reading them, and it's probably been about two years. Time flies!

And do not worry about "hectic" replies. Most of mine are. May I ask what you teach?

Leviathan.

[Brother Gonzalez]

Re: Leviathan. Satanist.

Following something blindly is radical. It's stupid to believe everything a book or person. Just look at modern day communism, tankies for example (they don't think the USSR did anything wrong and follow the words of stalin blindly)


So if you follow the bible 100% do you support slavery and even some parts of commumism (not all)?

But the Bible says it has to be followed 100%. If you are not going to follow it 100%, what is the point of having a Bible?
Yes I support slavery, and I think homosexuals should be stoned to death. think that a raped woman deserves it, and that the rapist should marry the so-called victim. Of course, he has to pay the father of the slut.


That is written in the Bible, by God. God cannot be wrong. If I thought that God could be wrong, then He is not almighty, and He is not God. See the logic? believe 100% or don't believe at all. That is the real choice.


Unless you use religion as a shield from your fear of death. That way, you can invent your own religion for all I care. Just don't call yourself a Christian.


It is not the same with political views. Humans fail. God does not.

[Dick Redson]

Re: Leviathan. Satanist.

I dispute and object to your description, but I will not dwell on that issue. The Bible is God's guidebook and rule book and every kind of thing. We follow and obey the word of God, as found in the Bible. When you put together the new chair, do you follow the instructions, or do you just plunge ahead and put the bottom on before the top and then you can't get it all together in the end? Do you signal the left turn or do you just blaze your own trail? Do you use a toilet when nature calls?


Sometimes, you just have to follow the rules.

But what if a screw is missing?

[Alvin Moss]

Re: Leviathan. Satanist.

Following something blindly is radical. It's stupid to believe everything a book or person. Just look at modern day communism, tankies for example (they don't think the USSR did anything wrong and follow the words of stalin blindly)


So if you follow the bible 100% do you support slavery and even some parts of commumism (not all)?

I dispute and object to your description, but I will not dwell on that issue. The Bible is God's guidebook and rule book and every kind of thing. We follow and obey the word of God, as found in the Bible. When you put together the new chair, do you follow the instructions, or do you just plunge ahead and put the bottom on before the top and then you can't get it all together in the end? Do you signal the left turn or do you just blaze your own trail? Do you use a toilet when nature calls?


Sometimes, you just have to follow the rules.