X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Miss Cassandra
    replied
    Re: Thanks, Landover, for ruining my childhood!

    Originally posted by Sariel View Post
    It's only stupid to ignore Biblical teachings if you believe in that nonsense.
    Then it's doubly stupid, because believing in the bible is stupid, and ignoring something you claim to believe in is stupid!

    Originally posted by sloppyjotbone View Post
    See, you both contradict each other.
    They often do. They themselves have no problem with that, as there are still a lot more self-contradictions within the bible, which they claim to follow to the letter. They do not care to make much sense.

    I mean, look at their "rebukes" of your post:

    Originally posted by James Hutchins View Post
    There is no contradiction. Once again, you are wrong.
    Originally posted by Pastor Ezekiel View Post
    You think that because you are unsaved and lack discernment. Plus, your father is satan.
    Isn't christianity an amazingly logical religion?

    Leave a comment:


  • Pastor Ezekiel
    replied
    Re: Thanks, Landover, for ruining my childhood!

    Originally posted by sloppyjotbone View Post
    See, you both contradict each other.
    You think that because you are unsaved and lack discernment. Plus, your father is satan.

    John 8:43 Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word. 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. 8:45 And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not.

    Leave a comment:


  • James Hutchins
    replied
    Re: Thanks, Landover, for ruining my childhood!

    Originally posted by sloppyjotbone View Post
    See, you both contradict each other.
    There is no contradiction. Once again, you are wrong.

    Leave a comment:


  • sloppyjotbone
    replied
    Re: Thanks, Landover, for ruining my childhood!

    Originally posted by Jacob11 View Post
    You are not fit to lick Brother Cranky Old Man's hunting boots. Those passages have everything to do with homersexicality. If you're a fag who deliberately ignores Leviticus 18:22 and who likes to look at gay p*rn or stroke your tallywhacker while fantasizing about men who are not Jesus, you should cut off your hands and pluck out your eyes. Otherwise, you will burn in hellfire. It's simple logic. Maybe if you used your head, you'd realize the relevance of those passages. In fact, by that logic, you're the "stupid one". Not only do you ignore Biblical teachings, but you don't use your God-given head. Shame.
    Originally posted by Cranky Old Man View Post
    Of course they do not have to do with homosexuality. Are you stupid and blind? Mark 9:47 and Mark 9:43 are clearly about porn and masturbation. For homosexuality we have: Romans 1:26-27 "For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet."

    Do you see how God has an answer for everything?


    See, you both contradict each other.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cranky Old Man
    replied
    Re: Thanks, Landover, for ruining my childhood!

    Originally posted by sloppyjotbone View Post
    I have noticed that you are one of the most ridiculously stupid people that frequent this website. You use the same two to three bible passages, and you use them all completely wrong. Those two passages have absolutley nothing to do with homosexuality.
    Of course they do not have to do with homosexuality. Are you stupid and blind? Mark 9:47 and Mark 9:43 are clearly about porn and masturbation. For homosexuality we have: Romans 1:26-27 "For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet."

    Do you see how God has an answer for everything?

    Leave a comment:


  • Sariel
    replied
    Re: Thanks, Landover, for ruining my childhood!

    Originally posted by Jacob11 View Post
    You are not fit to lick Brother Cranky Old Man's hunting boots. Those passages have everything to do with homersexicality. If you're a fag who deliberately ignores Leviticus 18:22 and who likes to look at gay p*rn or stroke your tallywhacker while fantasizing about men who are not Jesus, you should cut off your hands and pluck out your eyes. Otherwise, you will burn in hellfire. It's simple logic. Maybe if you used your head, you'd realize the relevance of those passages. In fact, by that logic, you're the "stupid one". Not only do you ignore Biblical teachings, but you don't use your God-given head. Shame.
    So you're saying it's ok to stroke your tallywhacker and fantasize about Jesus? That's how you make it seem.
    It's only stupid to ignore Biblical teachings if you believe in that nonsense.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jacob the Angry Liar
    replied
    Re: Thanks, Landover, for ruining my childhood!

    Originally posted by sloppyjotbone View Post
    I have noticed that you are one of the most ridiculously stupid people that frequent this website. You use the same two to three bible passages, and you use them all completely wrong. Those two passages have absolutley nothing to do with homosexuality. Especially when you are accusing someone of things that they are not. Your stupidity honestly has amazed me.
    You are not fit to lick Brother Cranky Old Man's hunting boots. Those passages have everything to do with homersexicality. If you're a fag who deliberately ignores Leviticus 18:22 and who likes to look at gay p*rn or stroke your tallywhacker while fantasizing about men who are not Jesus, you should cut off your hands and pluck out your eyes. Otherwise, you will burn in hellfire. It's simple logic. Maybe if you used your head, you'd realize the relevance of those passages. In fact, by that logic, you're the "stupid one". Not only do you ignore Biblical teachings, but you don't use your God-given head. Shame.

    Leave a comment:


  • Forest Spirit
    replied
    Re: Thanks, Landover, for ruining my childhood!

    This is so terrible I'm sorry for you I hope you never have to go back to that place again you need to get on with your life and go somewhere that you can make something of yourself like New York or Paris good luck to you and I'm so happy that at least someone has enough brains to get out of this crazy cult.

    Leave a comment:


  • sloppyjotbone
    replied
    Re: Thanks, Landover, for ruining my childhood!

    Originally posted by Cranky Old Man View Post
    Your obsession with porn is getting the better of you. To make sure you stop staring at porn you now have to poke your own eyes out! The Bible is very clear on that: Mark 9:47 "And if thine eye offend thee, pluck it out: it is better for thee to enter into the kingdom of God with one eye, than having two eyes to be cast into hell fire". Since you can still see porn with one eye, you will have to poke both of them out.

    You are probably also an obsessive compulsive masturbator. The Bible is very clear on what you have to do about that. You have to rent a chainsaw and remove your hand! Mark 9:43 "And if thy hand offend thee, cut it off: it is better for thee to enter into life maimed, than having two hands to go into hell, into the fire that never shall be quenched". To be on the safe side you might want to remove both hands.

    And after you poked your eyes out and removed your hands you have to start reading your KJV1611 Holy Bible to prevent eternal damnation to hell .

    I have noticed that you are one of the most ridiculously stupid people that frequent this website. You use the same two to three bible passages, and you use them all completely wrong. Those two passages have absolutley nothing to do with homosexuality. Especially when you are accusing someone of things that they are not. Your stupidity honestly has amazed me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sariel
    replied
    Re: Thanks, Landover, for ruining my childhood!

    Originally posted by Miss Cassandra View Post
    I believe he has sold everything he possesses, following the advice of Free Market Fred, a "true christian" charlatan who will be very rich once people realize the rapture isn't going to happen and they are going to pay $99 a month without having their debts settled, as Fred promised.
    Even though it's deceitful, it's quite clever, taking advantage of blind faith to make some quick money. It's a shame..

    Leave a comment:


  • Miss Cassandra
    replied
    Re: Thanks, Landover, for ruining my childhood!

    Originally posted by Sariel View Post
    According to you the world is going to end in 4 days.. Go ahead, spend all your savings, triple mortgage your house.. i bet your spirits wont be as high when you're homeless.
    I believe he has sold everything he possesses, following the advice of Free Market Fred, a "true christian" charlatan who will be very rich once people realize the rapture isn't going to happen and they are going to pay $99 a month without having their debts settled, as Fred promised.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sariel
    replied
    Re: Thanks, Landover, for ruining my childhood!

    Originally posted by Cranky Old Man View Post
    You will, I will be the one laughing at you while you are burning in hell .
    According to you the world is going to end in 4 days.. Go ahead, spend all your savings, triple mortgage your house.. i bet your spirits wont be as high when you're homeless.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cranky Old Man
    replied
    Re: Thanks, Landover, for ruining my childhood!

    Originally posted by Sariel View Post
    Wow.. i can't wait to meet this Cranky..
    You will, I will be the one laughing at you while you are burning in hell .

    Leave a comment:


  • Sariel
    replied
    Re: Thanks, Landover, for ruining my childhood!

    Wow.. i can't wait to meet this Cranky..

    Leave a comment:


  • Miss Cassandra
    replied
    Re: Thanks, Landover, for ruining my childhood!

    Originally posted by Rachel Sue View Post
    I'm not the one whose religion worships a woman for having relations with a bipedal goat (who is technically her bastard son). Bestiality and incest together in one religion? Well from what I've heard about you, that seems about right.
    And again you take the beliefs of a few wiccans and extrapolate to the greater group. That means you are close minded and stupid. Even within a covens, personal beliefs vary vastly.

    And speaking as someone who worships a zombie that is the bastard son of a guy named "Jealous" and a young jewish girl, I think your position to criticize my religion isn't very strong!

    By your own reasoning, since you refuse to marry and since you hide from your own father, you have no mind. Correct?
    Wow, being a "true christian housewife" really makes women braindead.

    If you had followed my very simple argument, you would have realized that I reasoned from your position, if you followed biblical law. I personally reject biblical law, and I don't think the man is the head of the woman.

    a power hungry pervert wrote a book about a pipe dream and convinced thousands of weak minded idiots to follow his lead.
    This really makes me think of some other religion. Hmmm. Which one could that be?

    So long as my hunting and fishing do not interfere with my housework, they are nothing to be ashamed of.
    Pastor Billy Reuben often says: if a woman has spare time, than she hasn't cleaned the house/studied the bible thoroughly enough.

    He is a complete retard, that is true, but a retard who is in a leading position in your religion. Shouldn't you obey someone like that?

    As for Philippe being older than me, what do you honestly expect? Why would I want to marry a child when I'll soon have my hands full with my own babies?
    You're taking it to the other extreme, Rachel. I was talking about marrying someone of the same age as you are. Not a child.

    Originally posted by Rachel Sue View Post
    I see from your mastery of the English language that you have been poorly home schooled. I honestly can't understand a single thing that you're trying to say. Your second sentence doesn't even contain a verb!
    How can Tekk021 help that you have become so stupid at home school that you can't understand him? That's not his fault, that's your parents' fault.

    Originally posted by Tekk021 View Post
    Frankly, you were the one implying that I was looking at the male rear, so it would have to be some sick part of your mind to think that, with out even knowing me. I would not be surprised one bit if you in fact, were the one that liked looking that the male buttocks if you are so quick to assume everyone else is.
    You are very right, Tekk. Many christian pastors are latent homosexuals, as homophobes generally are (Adams et al, 1996).

    Originally posted by Tekk021 View Post
    Now you see Sir COM your Rev. M. Rodimer. Brought up the "buttocks" first, in which I commented about, had you actually been reading and comprehending what had been typed, and had entered your tiny mind, you would note that I have nothing to do with such things as that. However, your mind seems to be too tiny to process such information as that, in which case I feel very sorry for you, since you are twisting my words to make yourself look better in the eyes of your god.
    They have lost the fight, but they do not realize it, Tekk. Rodimer is a little slimeball from another church who dreams of a fascist "true christian" state where homosexuals are publicly stoned.
    Cranky is a deranged hermit living on the outskirts of the town of Freehold, and rumors persist about his suspicious fondling of his guns, and the unusual lubricity of their barrels. I'll leave it at that.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X