[James Hutchins]

Re: Hello

Well, he was not a Christian, nor was Darwin, but both admitted, a greater power exists. The point being, even the most stubborn, God haters in the world have faced the truth, openly admitted they were wrong and did not have all the answers, that a 'higher power' did and does exist. We have found that higher power, it is God.

Now, I have given you overwhelming proofs of His existence. Have you proofs that God does not exist?

[The Cynic]

Re: Hello

Well, he was not a Christian, nor was Darwin, but both admitted, a greater power exists. The point being, even the most stubborn, God haters in the world have faced the truth, openly admitted they were wrong and did not have all the answers, that a 'higher power' did and does exist. We have found that higher power, it is God.

Now, I have given you overwhelming proofs of His existence. Have you proofs that God does not exist?

Juat because Darwin and Einstein believed does not mean that I do. I do not blindly follow figureheads. That is WHY I do not believe in a God. I don't care if they believed, they helped bring the world towards a more enlightened age. If they believed whilst doing so, who cares? I am not the intolerant one, you lot are.

These are not "overwhelming proofs". As said above, I do not blindly follow figureheads.

Also, Darwin was agnostic.

[Billy Bob Jenkins]

Re: Hello

You're not doing a very good job of making your religion seem very attractive,

How attractive does Heaven have to be, for you to choose it over Hell?

These are not "overwhelming proofs".

How can you not be overwhelmed by proof of God? Isn't the question as to whether or not there is a God the most important question there is, except for "am I going to Hell?"

You make light of the fact that there is a God, but God does not take your mockery so lightly, friend. When you are being perpetually dissolved in a boiling pool of human excrement in Hell, you will not take Him lightly then. God humbles even the strongest of men. He is omnipotent.

[James Hutchins]

Re: Hello

Juat because Darwin and Einstein believed does not mean that I do. I do not blindly follow figureheads. That is WHY I do not believe in a God. I don't care if they believed, they helped bring the world towards a more enlightened age. If they believed whilst doing so, who cares? I am not the intolerant one, you lot are.

These are not "overwhelming proofs". As said above, I do not blindly follow figureheads.

Also, Darwin was agnostic.

Friend, you entirely miss the point, again. If you choose not to beleive in God, that is certainly your choice. God gave you the gift of free will. How you use that gift is entirely up to you. The least you could do is thank Him for it.

Not caringing about your fellow man and then in the same breath, calling us intolerant? Excuse me, I did not realize this website was called "God Haters" and I 'accidently' stumbled into it.

By the way, this comment of yours:

...I don't care if they believed, they helped bring the world towards a more enlightened age....

gave me a good belly laugh.

Darwin was agnostic untill the end. Everyone who professes to hate God is. As I said before, this is a time when God gets to chuckle.

Once you get out of your teens and the silliness of childish hormones wear off, you'll sing a differnt hymn.

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: Hello

Juat because Darwin and Einstein believed does not mean that I do. I do not blindly follow figureheads. That is WHY I do not believe in a God. I don't care if they believed, they helped bring the world towards a more enlightened age. If they believed whilst doing so, who cares? I am not the intolerant one, you lot are.

These are not "overwhelming proofs". As said above, I do not blindly follow figureheads.

Also, Darwin was agnostic.

Denying the existence of God is not unbelief but an exercise in self-deception. You may know things, but you cannot account for anything you know. Arguing against God's existence would be on par with arguing against the existence of air, breathing it all the while. You use the universal, immaterial, unchanging laws of logic, mathematics, science, and absolute morality in order to come to rational decisions, but you cannot account for them. These laws are not the only way God has revealed himself to you, but they are sufficient to show the irrationality of your thinking, and expose your guilt for denying Him.

There is a reason that you deny the existence of God and it has nothing to do with proof. I can show this to you. Do you think that you can continue to deny God because surely somewhere, sometime, a philosopher or scientist will come up with an explanation for universal, immaterial, unchanging laws apart from God?' Did you ever try to come up with an alternate explanation on your own?

Hoping that an alternate explanation for universal, immaterial, unchanging laws can someday be found apart from God, is a blind leap of faith, or wishful thinking. Isn't it interesting that this is exactly what professed unbelievers accuse Christians of?

Please examine the real reason why you are running from God. It is my prayer that God will open your eyes and change your heart so that you may be saved from your sin, embraced by His ferocious love, and that you will tithe robustly immediately using the Paypal button at the bottom of this page.

[Redeemed Papist]

Re: Hello

The Bible was written during a time of misogyny, racism and homophobia. Are you suggesting that we should all return to those days? Face it, the Bible needs an update to the world of now.

Religion was created in order for the ancients to explain the things happening around them, things which we now understand. Denying things which have been proven fact is like a small child with its hands over its eyes and its fingers in its ears because it doesn't like something. Humans are the top of the foodchain because we adapt so well to things. Why not to this also. After all, if we are to hypothetically say God exists, why would He create us with such a propensity for adaptation if He did not wish us to use it. Change helps perfect things, it has been proven time and again. After all, the Bible you yourselves quote is the output from much change.

I'm suggesting that God didn't want us to move away from those days in the first place. He makes it pretty clear that He's not compromising. Why do you think we now have AIDS?

Are you suggesting that the Bible was just written as a rubber stamp from a made up God to reinforce the prejudices of the time and is no longer valid? How hateful!