Re: Hello, Friends!
The thread you are trying to derail belongs to Mr Gerkoff (it's his intro thread).
You went on to say:
. . .
“.You are not paying attention, the qoute you pick has was about and article Irinka posteed and not Josephus..”
As you can see, Mr Grekoff's claim about non-existence of the historical Jesus was being refuted with a reference to Josephus. Your view that there was no Resurrection and that The Church sort of congealed from the corpse of Roman paganism over a couple of centuries together with your other view that it is not possible to date that historical event (even though you don't believe it occurred at all) means that Josephus' work is at exactly the time your theory would require.
Now the next bit will be too complicated for you (Mr Freddie) so I'll keep it to words of one syllable:
. . .STOP .. GO · ING .. TO .. BRO · NY .. FEST .. IT .. NO .. GOOD .. FOR .. YOU
Originally Posted by Jo Freddie who seems a bit confused following the Brony convention
…
Originally posted by Irinka the repentant jewess
View Post
. . .
“.You are not paying attention, the qoute you pick has was about and article Irinka posteed and not Josephus..”As you can see, Mr Grekoff's claim about non-existence of the historical Jesus was being refuted with a reference to Josephus. Your view that there was no Resurrection and that The Church sort of congealed from the corpse of Roman paganism over a couple of centuries together with your other view that it is not possible to date that historical event (even though you don't believe it occurred at all) means that Josephus' work is at exactly the time your theory would require.
Now the next bit will be too complicated for you (Mr Freddie) so I'll keep it to words of one syllable:
. . .STOP .. GO · ING .. TO .. BRO · NY .. FEST .. IT .. NO .. GOOD .. FOR .. YOU
Comment