[Benedict A. Davis]

Re: Catholics ARE Christians (NTS Fallacy)

Good question, Sister!! We read the Bible, not the New Yorker. And I haven't touched a hotdog since I became an ex-gay.

Clearly this guy is a liberal with gaysexual tendancies. The very name (Shadow Fox) links both subterfuge and duplicitousness (shadow) with sodomy (I think we all know which f-word is close to "fox").

And we have been nothing but polite to him, and he has been nothing but mean and potty-mouthy back.

I must ask is this Shadow Fox the Shadowfox ( also known as Failfox, Eightbitfox, ShikiKit) I found via Google. If so saving him will take the joint determination of our entire congregation. I am not sure if the LBC ex-gay program will help. I have cut a small part of his description to demonstrate what the world thought of this tortured soul. I am including only a small part of the description but it was all that was fit to print on a Christian site. Ladies avert your eyes, ask your husbands or your father to describe him to you.

Apart from being the ideal fur fag and certified asshat Shadowfox is a constant lier and overall bastard. He will lie from anything form the size of his own cock to how he doesn't beat up on his boyfriends. He also considers himself a 133t haxtor, in which he installs key loggers on his room mates computers so he can steal their passwords and accounts.

It goes on to describe him a sodomite and a furrie(?), whatever that means. To this person only one thing can be said "God save him''.It is the only chance he has. As an aside the article hinted to him favoring men in skirts but said nothing of Scotsmen.

[Faith_Machine]

Re: Catholics ARE Christians (NTS Fallacy)

No, actually that's an analogy. The two are quite different.

There's nothing fallacious about that, or is there?

Sorry Shadow Fox, but you just got your ass handed to you by a novice who's still so young in his faith that he hasn't even been granted True Christian™ status.

Brendan, I congratulate you on schooling this person about the difference between a straw man fallacy and an analogy.

Look me up next time you're in town and I'll take you to church. After, we'll enjoy a bottle of Knob Creek and fine cigars!

[MitzaLizalor]

Re: Catholics ARE Christians (NTS Fallacy)

Christianity: Noun: Any religion that follows the teachings or worship of Jesus Christ

Hello, and welcome to the forum. I have read your posts and there is one detail, which would help me understand your position a bit better, that you've omitted.

Could you give me an example of just one teaching of Jesus Christ that is actually followed by a catholic? I am not aware of any such compliance and if your definition is correct you should be able to find an example for me.

That would be helpful. Thanks

[Faith_Machine]

Re: Catholics ARE Christians (NTS Fallacy)

Christianity is the teachings of the ORAL Jesus

Boy, you are lucky we are separated by lots of miles of Internet cables, because if you said something like that in my presence, I would beat the tar out of you.

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: Catholics ARE Christians (NTS Fallacy)

No true scottsman.

In other words, its the purity argument and I know your playing dumb so I will tell you anyway.

Friend,

There is a clear flaw in your argument; please show us any TRUE Christian™ who preforms such horrible anti-Christians acts as child baptism or working on Sundays like the Catholics do. Unless someone is pure, someone by definition isn't a TRUE Christian(tm) and believing at the same level our Loving Savior demands.

[Pastor Isaac Peters]

Re: Catholics ARE Christians (NTS Fallacy)

No true scottsman.

In other words, its the purity argument and I know your playing dumb so I will tell you anyway.

Example:

What? Those Christians who go to that church over there WORK ON SUNDAYS?! They cannot possibly be Christians! We are the only real Christians.

You put Ketchup on your Hotdog? Your not a REAL New Yorker!

You do not agree that Xbox has the best Graphics? Your Not a REAL Xbox Fan!

Etc...etc...etc..

From an only somewhat liberal-biased source:

The fallacy is not committed when the term has a clear and accepted definition and the example falls outside of that definition. For example, someone saying that no true monotheist believes in multiple gods does not commit the fallacy, since the clear and accepted definition of a monotheist is someone who believes in only one God.

We've already explained at length how Catholicism falls outside of Christianity as the Bible defines it.

[ExGay Alex]

Re: Catholics ARE Christians (NTS Fallacy)

What have hot dogs and The New Yorker got to do with the Scotch?

Good question, Sister!! We read the Bible, not the New Yorker. And I haven't touched a hotdog since I became an ex-gay.

Clearly this guy is a liberal with gaysexual tendancies. The very name (Shadow Fox) links both subterfuge and duplicitousness (shadow) with sodomy (I think we all know which f-word is close to "fox").

And we have been nothing but polite to him, and he has been nothing but mean and potty-mouthy back.

[Attila's Wife]

Re: Catholics ARE Christians (NTS Fallacy)

What have hot dogs and The New Yorker got to do with the Scotch?

[Dr Laurence Niles]

Re: Catholics ARE Christians (NTS Fallacy)

No true scottsman.

Do you honestly believe there are no Scotchmen?

A quick Googles search proves you wrong.

[Shadow Fox]

Re: Catholics ARE Christians (NTS Fallacy)

No true scottsman.

In other words, its the purity argument and I know your playing dumb so I will tell you anyway.

Example:

What? Those Christians who go to that church over there WORK ON SUNDAYS?! They cannot possibly be Christians! We are the only real Christians.

You put Ketchup on your Hotdog? Your not a REAL New Yorker!

You do not agree that Xbox has the best Graphics? Your Not a REAL Xbox Fan!

Etc...etc...etc..

[Dr Laurence Niles]

Re: Catholics ARE Christians (NTS Fallacy)

no true scottsman ideas alive.

This is what I don't understand.

Jesus does not even like the Scotch so why you think we want to protect them is frankly bizarre.

God hates the Scotch

I hope this helps you on you journey to Jesus.

YIC

[Zechariah Smyth]

Re: Catholics ARE Christians (NTS Fallacy)

oh sure, remove my links proving that you are all full of *** potty language *** so you can keep your "purity" no true scottsman ideas alive.

You are all a bunch of fools with moderators who abuse their powers like the intellectual cowards they are.

I feel sorry for retards like you. You must feel so safe in that bubble you have their that your imaginary friend gave you!

Watch the language, please.

Yours in Christ,

Z. Smyth

[Shadow Fox]

Re: Catholics ARE Christians (NTS Fallacy)

oh sure, remove my links proving that you are all full of *** potty language *** so you can keep your "purity" no true scottsman ideas alive.

You are all a bunch of fools with moderators who abuse their powers like the intellectual cowards they are.

I feel sorry for retards like you. You must feel so safe in that bubble you have their that your imaginary friend gave you!

[Attila's Wife]

Re: Catholics ARE Christians (NTS Fallacy)

Baptism is the only true Christianity, as it will be the only one where the members will end up in heaven (if they follow it correctly). The rest are all as useless as fake handbags, because you will still end up in hell.

Much, much more useless than fake handbags, Steph dear. For example, if you should accidentally buy your grandmother a fake designer handbag for her birthday, then she can always give it to the help, or (equally accidentally) give it back to you for Christmas. It is still a handbag and can be used.

But what is the value of a fake version of Christianity? It is worthless.

2 Corinthians 11:13-14

[Oliver Brendan Hayve]

Re: Catholics ARE Christians (NTS Fallacy)

Nice Strawman fallacy there

No, actually that's an analogy. The two are quite different.

kid.

There's nothing fallacious about that, or is there?