WEDDINGS THAT SHOULDN'T BE ALLOWED...

[Brother_Percy]

We all know that Queer Weddings are against God, and so are Retard Weddings. God hates fags enough as it is, but to let them Marry is blasphemy! And as for retards, God doesn't even want these abominations anywhere NEAR a Church, let alone INSIDE ONE!

But what other kinds of Weddings shouldn't be allowed?

[Bobby-Joe]

Re: WEDDINGS THAT SHOULDN'T BE ALLOWED...

Atheists. If atheists won't even admit God exists why should they be allowed to use His ceremonies.

[northernstudent]

Re: WEDDINGS THAT SHOULDN'T BE ALLOWED...

beause they have magnificen arciecture in churches... and its just tradition

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: WEDDINGS THAT SHOULDN'T BE ALLOWED...

beause they have magnificen arciecture in churches... and its just tradition

Brother Percy already mentioned that God doesn't even want retardeds in His churches, much less to be married. I see no point in your pathetic attempts to justify your desire for a church wedding.

[northernstudent]

Re: WEDDINGS THAT SHOULDN'T BE ALLOWED...

Oh, I really want to cry now that some fat batstard on a forum called me retarded. I do not have any food allergies at all, and as I have mentioned to you before, do not have glasses. Furthermore I would call being fat a disability, as it limits your ability as a human, so in conclusion you are more of a retard, and should be cast from God's earth! You are not worthy

[Marshall]

Re: WEDDINGS THAT SHOULDN'T BE ALLOWED...

The gays and the race traitors and the gimps and the Athians and the drugged up and drop outs and homeless and Katrina leeches and foriegners and folks in wheelchairs and folks who are about to die from disease.

None of them people or any combination of those people should marry one another or each other or anyone else.

Gays are abominations. God says so and thats good enough for me. Rewarding sin is not very Christianly.

Interspecies weddings is an abomination too. Marrying a black or a Chinese or an Injun or a European is akin to self loathing and invites all sorts of diseases and weird family ties. Just marrying a black could mean a Muslim in your family tree swinging around.

Gimps and retards are mistakes and shouldn't hold jobs or shop or drive much less get married in a Church of God.

Athians don't believe in Jesus so why should they benefit from His ceremonies? Let them tie whatever knot they tie in a Satanist church somewhere in California if they want to be together. Jesus wants nothing to do with them.

Drug addicts are worthless and should be rounded up and sent to prison where they belong.

Drop outs aren't worth marrying since they can't get a real job and anyone who would marry a drop out is a retard and I already told you what needs to be done with those kind of people.

Homeless people should be locked up too. Nothing worse than a bum panhandling right in the street in front of the hotel you are staying at or the restaurant you are trying to eat at. Beggars are nuisances anyway you look at it. Where are they going to carry the bride across the threshold? WalMart?

Katrina people are the same as homeless people, druggies and drop outs combined. Losers. And black.

Foreigners should stick to their own and leave American women alone. Let them marry their own hairy women.

Cripples are abominations unto the Lord. The Bible says it, I believe it, thats all there is to it.

The terminally ill are going to die soon anyway, why award them benefits right before they go Tango Uniform? Waste of time and money and it makes a tax headache for the rest of us normal folks just trying to live a humble life for Jesus.

[Rev. M. Rodimer]

Re: WEDDINGS THAT SHOULDN'T BE ALLOWED...

Oh, I really want to cry now that some fat batstard on a forum called me retarded. I do not have any food allergies at all, and as I have mentioned to you before, do not have glasses. Furthermore I would call being fat a disability, as it limits your ability as a human, so in conclusion you are more of a retard, and should be cast from God's earth! You are not worthy

Food allergies?! Who said a word about food allergies?!

My dear little girl, as anyone who is NOT a retarded can plainly see, I'm certainly not fat. I have a square, manly jaw and a full face, rather than being some gaunt little queer waif like the Irish drunk you see in the mirror.

Your childlike attempts to upset me by saying I'm obese are quite amusing, but hardly making much of a point. You'll have to do better than that.

Now, please try to stay on topic, rather than making every thread about YOU, YOU, YOU!

[northernstudent]

Re: WEDDINGS THAT SHOULDN'T BE ALLOWED...

You do look fat to me, but I guess that is what constitutes thin in America.
I never said you were "obese", just "fat", like you are.

[Mrs. Mary Whitford]

Re: WEDDINGS THAT SHOULDN'T BE ALLOWED...

1 Corinthians 11:3 But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.

Without Christ, there is no marriage. So no non-Christians should be permitted to wed.

[Marshall]

Re: WEDDINGS THAT SHOULDN'T BE ALLOWED...

Well smartypants, we can't all look like a 40s Jew. Some of us have whats called MUSCLE TONE. Look it up. I realize that term is alien to a Eurotrash elitist such as yourself.

[Larry Lee]

Re: WEDDINGS THAT SHOULDN'T BE ALLOWED...

You know, God's not too keen on the impure marrying. If you're not on a par with Jesus' own purity, when He presents Himself at the wedding feast, you probably need to think twice about Holy Matrimony as an option suited to you. A roll in the hay; a quickie behind the stadium; a one-time experiment with raw meat, Jeff Koons and a videographer; a lustful heart for Jimmy Carter's Semitic dialogues... Well, they all preclude you from ever participating in the sacrament of marriage, in God®’s eyes. Sorry.

[Brother Temperance]

Re: WEDDINGS THAT SHOULDN'T BE ALLOWED...

Should Anglicans be allowed to marry? Jesus and I say no. Also, Slick Willy and Hitlery were allowed to marry, and look what happened: he defiled he sanctity of marriage by spilling his seed all over some Jewess. Is this an inevitable consequence every time two Democrats marry? Maybe, maybe not, but I for one am not willing to take the risk.

[Marshall]

Re: WEDDINGS THAT SHOULDN'T BE ALLOWED...

Aren't most Democrats gay?

[Pastor Ezekiel]

Re: WEDDINGS THAT SHOULDN'T BE ALLOWED...

I've been saying for years from the pulpit that Jesus provided me with that only Certifiable True Christians™ should be allowed to marry. Nobody else has any business going through phony elaborate ceremonies pretending that God sanctions their unsaved coupling.

That would shut those radical queers up right quick.

[Brother Temperance]

Re: WEDDINGS THAT SHOULDN'T BE ALLOWED...

Aren't most Democrats gay?

I'm not sure. Kucinich is a notorious queer, which would explain why he needs such an attractive wife as cover. On the other hand, I certainly wouldn't trust Baraq Osambo with a white woman any more than I'd trust him in the White House. Also, I've heard first-hand from an ex-Democrat that John Edwards actually doesn't have anything down there at all. He soldered it all off to appease the feminazis and make him seem like a more credible rival to Hillary, and now he's as smooth as a Ken doll. Jesus weeps at this abuse of the body that Our Father made in His image.