X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Hijab Paradox: liberals want it all

    The current news from Iran is that the ladies are throwing a hissy fit, and a few molotov cocktails, about not wearing a hijab. For those who don't know, it's a type of hat like a MAGA cap except it shows they side with the terrorists. Apparently the ladies don't want to wear it any more because blah blah who cares. The point is, they're breaking the law and that's a crime and so they are getting punished by death by burning. Logic.

    In America, of course, under the mind-bending anti-law of liberal ideology, the ladies are fighting to wear the darn hats. Only a few brave radio talk show hosts dare whisper about banning them from public spaces. For Freedom, some of us want to ban the men from wearing Muslim hats too, but let's stick it to the ladies for now.

    So, it's the eternal question: what do women want? They fight us to not wear the hijab and fight us to wear the hijab. If they can't make their mind up, we'll decide for them and, of course, they won't like that either . Men can't win.
    If I have seen further, it is by standing on the heads of others.

  • #2
    Re: The Hijab Paradox: liberals want it all

    Great points, Brother Toole.

    My understanding is that the liberals have to side with Khomeini on this one.

    That's because the liberals want everyone to respect Muslim cultures, and in Iran the Muslim culture requires wearing the hijab, and so women breaking this cultural rule are disrespecting Muslim culture and therefore offending other members of the community.
    God created fossils to test our faith.

    * * *

    My favorite LBC sermons:
    True Christians are Perfect!
    True Christian™ Love.
    Salvation™ made Easy!
    You can’t be a Christian if you don’t believe the Old Testament.
    Jesus is impolite. Deal with it.
    Jesus is xenophobic and so should we.
    Sanctity of Life is NOT a Biblical Concept.
    Biblical view on modern-day slavery.
    The Immorality of the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights."
    Geneva Conventions vs. The Holy Bible.
    God HATES Rational Thinking!
    True Christian™ Man as a spitting image of God.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: The Hijab Paradox: liberals want it all

      Originally posted by Dr. Anthony J. Toole View Post
      So, it's the eternal question: what do women want? They fight us to not wear the hijab and fight us to wear the hijab. If they can't make their mind up, we'll decide for them and, of course, they won't like that .
      It is alarming to see women daring to demonstrate in the streets in countries where they can be put in jail. It's a sign of how disrespectful women have become of men.

      Iran is a place where Muslim men have run everything for centuries. Especially, they have held the hammer over the heads of women. Women have had to dress conservatively and generally behave themselves. Now Iranian women have become so brazen it concerns even we Christian men. Apparently, they will have to spend time in jail learning their proper place.

      Op-Ed: Iranian women are rising up to demand freedom. Are we listening? (yahoo.com)
      Isaiah 24:1-3 Behold, the LORD maketh the earth empty (2)...as the taker of usury, so with the giver of usury to him. (3) The land shall be utterly emptied, and utterly spoiled: for the LORD hath spoken his word.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: The Hijab Paradox: liberals want it all

        Originally posted by Basilissa View Post
        My understanding is that the liberals have to side with Khomeini on this one.

        That's because the liberals want everyone to respect Muslim cultures, and in Iran the Muslim culture requires wearing the hijab, and so women breaking this cultural rule are disrespecting Muslim culture and therefore offending other members of the community.
        Thank you Sister. That is a crushing blow to liberalism. I think even they will have to admit their whole agenda is a front for Muslim autocracy driven by hatred of our superior Western culture (i.e. Christian fundamentalism).
        If I have seen further, it is by standing on the heads of others.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: The Hijab Paradox: liberals want it all

          It's easy to get confused here - like when the French tried to ban those female mooselimb hats. Liebral women insisted on wearing them in "solidarity" with their female "sisters" - but that would be "cultural appropriation".

          Not long ago there was the case of some white women making tacos - it was considered "cultural appropriation", as if only Mexicans ("people of color") were only allowed to make tacos.

          I agree, let's stick to the subject at hand - we won't even bring up whether only nigras are allowed to eat watermelon.
          Hell's foundations quiver at the shout of praise;
          brothers, lift your voices, loud your anthems raise.
          ...and get off my lawn
          sigpic

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: The Hijab Paradox: liberals want it all

            I just came across this disgusting picture, an Iranian woman flaunting her hair while marching in the street.

            I wish I knew some Iranian mayors. I would organize them to stop this independent behavior. From what I can tell, mayors there are afraid and hiding in closets.


            Isaiah 24:1-3 Behold, the LORD maketh the earth empty (2)...as the taker of usury, so with the giver of usury to him. (3) The land shall be utterly emptied, and utterly spoiled: for the LORD hath spoken his word.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: The Hijab Paradox: liberals want it all

              Originally posted by Basilissa View Post
              Great points, Brother Toole.

              My understanding is that the liberals have to side with Khomeini on this one.

              That's because the liberals want everyone to respect Muslim cultures, and in Iran the Muslim culture requires wearing the hijab, and so women breaking this cultural rule are disrespecting Muslim culture and therefore offending other members of the community.
              CAN YOU GUESS THE MISSING LETTERS ?
              We know that any revolting ideology may contain within it sound tenets, albeit of very limited (if any) influence. For example, under communism, theft was illegal. That didn't prevent people from stealing auto accessories (such as windshield wipers) but more importantly, due to the distorting lens of that dystopian creed, ALL property was considered theft and the sanctions were extreme. Unless you were the one applying the sanctions: then it was golden palaces, big fat limos and special lanes on the freeway just for you. Holiday homes on the Black Sea. English homosexuals laid on. Exotic commie spies needing training on how to seduce targets once out in the field, i.e. U.S.A., so very arduous keeping everything together.

              There was a time when I'd never heard about the hijab, burqa, niqab and so on; there's quite a few styles. Mohammed was a name I'd heard, Buddha, Hare Krishna, The Báb, Guru Nanak, various idiotic popes, occasionally an archbishop of Canterbury. I'd heard of John Wesley and the Japanese god-emperor – but I'd never heard what offended them. If I visited their country, I'd pay attention, not wishing to cause offence, pretty easy really. All of that still applies except for one group: it doesn't care what offends me but expects me never to offend it.

              There is always a danger in exporting technology. Aircraft are good examples, whether military or civilian the risk of something going wrong is always there. It was the liberals who loathed the free Iran, its centrist ruler (centrist by west Asian standards that is) and everything that went with it. Property ownership was rampant, you could even get a champagne cocktail or a cool beer. Liberals found all this very offensive and couldn't be happy until everyone else was offended too. They achieved this with a single restoration, a culturally appropriate tyrant, and one tragic flight as depicted above. And right there we see the danger of exporting technology. Someone else will get hold of it and do things you'd never dream of. To find the missing letters, by viewing the exported aircraft from another angle, tap or click the croissant [below] for a not altogether unexpected surprise.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: The Hijab Paradox: liberals want it all

                My Iranian is not great (nor is their American) but after 4 weeks the ladies and even some of the men don't seem to be accepting the mooslim theocracy very well. There are protests and worker strikes all over the country.

                Of course, it's no surprize to us. Nobody wants to be ruled by Sharia Law when the jewel of a Christian theocratic state is within sight. When America votes the Supreme Court appoints Trump again and we become the Christian Holy State, our soldiers for Christ will swarm over Iran. The uncouth Iraqis were too unsophisticated to "get it" in 2003-2021 but the smart Iranians will greet us as liberators. Not necessarily "us" per se but our robot war machines.
                If I have seen further, it is by standing on the heads of others.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: The Hijab Paradox: liberals want it all

                  There is one big advantage with robots. You never need to check whether they're catholics.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X