The Immorality of the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights"
 

The International Declaration of Human Rights is said to contain universal “human rights.” You can read the entire text of this ungodly declaration here. Even though it was signed by most countries on Earth, this document in itself is not binding. It is, however, the basis of several international treaties. Our Godly United States of America has signed a few of these treaties, but not all of them (and each time we included special clauses that let us do what we want anyway). Nevertheless, we should not have signed any of them, because this whole idea of “universal human rights” stands in clear contradiction of God’s words. Here’s the proof – I’ll debunk all of the articles of said declaration, one by one.


Article 1. All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.

This is not what Jesus said. :nono:

First and foremost, there is a difference between men and women. Women are inferior because they were created as help meet for men, and therefore, women should be quiet and obedient:


Article 2. Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.

This is a long chunk of heretical babbling. I’ve already discussed the sex differences, now let’s see what the Bible has to say about the other ones:

Race/color. We all know that Africa was the land of Ham (Psalm 105:23), and Genesis tells us that Ham’s son Canaan and his descendants were cursed to be servants forever:

Language and national origin. Jesus makes it clear that He despises some nationalities, and even compares them to dogs:

Religion. God is clear that there is only one true religion, and all others are false. God hates people who believe in false religions.


Article 3. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.

Wrong again. When God hates somebody, even an entire nation, these people should be wiped out from the face of the planet. That includes babies, too:

Article 4. No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.

Wrong again:


Article 5. No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

God disagrees:

There is no reason to treat dead enemy bodies with respect either:


Article 6. Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.

The verses provided above disprove this statement.

Read on...

Re: The Immorality of the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights"
 

Article 7. All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.

See Joshua 10:22-27 and 1 Samuel 15:32-33 above.


Article 8. Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.

See Joshua 10:22-27 and 1 Samuel 15:32-33 above.


Article 9. No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.

It’s not “arbitrary” when it is God’s will. In fact, God uses exile a lot for punishment:


Article 10. Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.

Again, see Joshua 10:22-27 and 1 Samuel 15:32-33 above. When Jesus says somebody is guilty, the sentence should be carried right away, no need for trials.


Article 11.
(1) Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.
(2) No one shall be held guilty of any penal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a penal offence, under national or international law, at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the penal offence was committed.

See above.


Article 12. No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

See above.


Article 13.
(1) Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state.
(2) Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.

Wrong. Those who are dead don’t have much mobility, do they?


Article 14.
(1) Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution.
(2) This right may not be invoked in the case of prosecutions genuinely arising from non-political crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

First, there is no such a thing as “United Nations” mentioned in the Bible, so it is an abomination in the eyes of God. Second, people should not seek asylum on areas belonging to other nations, because that could lead to intermarriages. God hates mixed relations (and that also proves that United Nations are an abomination, because uniting nations leads to intermingling):


Article 15.
(1) Everyone has the right to a nationality.
(2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality.

Wrong. God doesn’t like when people from one nation stay and even convert to the religion of another nation:


Article 16.
(1) Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.
(2) Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses.
(3) The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State.

Wrong. As I said before God doesn’t like mixed marriages, so that’s one Godly limitation. Also, since women are inferior (see verses provided for Article 1), so they have no “equal rights” whatsoever.


Article 17.
(1) Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others.
(2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.

Wrong. God approves pillage during wars:


Article 18. Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.

Wrong. Many times God allows for and in fact commands oppressing religious freedom:


Article 19. Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

God doesn’t like free thinkers. In fact, God doesn’t like smart people in general:


Article 20.
(1) Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.
(2) No one may be compelled to belong to an association.

Only a Godly association is what God approves of:

Re: The Immorality of the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights"
 

Article 21.
(1) Everyone has the right to take part in the government of his country, directly or through freely chosen representatives.
(2) Everyone has the right of equal access to public service in his country.
(3) The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.

There’s nothing about democracy in the Bible. The name “democracy” derives from a Greek government system in which a few male “citizens” (born to “citizen” parents, not immigrants or descendants of immigrants), who constituted roughly 5% of the population, were allowed to vote. However, the American democracy is derived from the Iroquois government system (including impeachment and Electoral College). Why should we respect a system which is not sanctified by God, and which was developed by some primitive savages (who are burning in Hell as we speak)?


Article 22.
Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realization, through national effort and international co-operation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and the free development of his personality.

Warning: ungodly communist agenda!!:nono:

According to God’s will, there is no need to have social security, because we need poor people as subjects of our charitable donations:

In addition, these poor clearly have no faith in God, otherwise, they would have all the resources they need:

Article 23.
(1) Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment.
(2) Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work.
(3) Everyone who works has the right to just and favourable remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection.
(4) Everyone has the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.

These statements clearly do not take under account what God says about the best employment system ever – the slavery (Leviticus 25:44-46).

Slaves should be obedient:

There are even rules for selling and keeping female sex slaves:

Article 24. Everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay.

This rule obviously does not apply to slaves. :watermelon:


Article 25.
(1) Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.
(2) Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection.

Widows and such will be provided for by charitable members of God-fearing community (see eg. Deuteronomy 14:28-29).

Children born out of wedlock, however, are not loved by God:


Article 26.
(1) Everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free, at least in the elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be compulsory. Technical and professional education shall be made generally available and higher education shall be equally accessible to all on the basis of merit.
(2) Education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and to the strengthening of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. It shall promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups, and shall further the activities of the United Nations for the maintenance of peace.
(3) Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children.

Good education must include teaching fear of God:

Otherwise, worldly “science” is ungodly and foolish in the eyes of God:

Article 27.
(1) Everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancement and its benefits.
(2) Everyone has the right to the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of which he is the author.

Wrong. God is the ultimate author of all art:


Article 28. Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized.

Since I’ve already proven that these “rights and freedoms” are ungodly and simply immoral, this statement is wrong as well.


Article 29.
(1) Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.
(2) In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society.
(3) These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Wrong. We have duties to God, not “community.” And again, United Nations are an abomination in the eyes of God.

Article 30. Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.

This entire declaration goes against God’s will and should not be followed by any True Christian™! :thumbdown:

Re: The Immorality of the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights"
 

This is dangerous and godless communism.

What can we do about this, Pastor?

Re: The Immorality of the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights"
 

I will sleep better at night knowing that this immoral declaration is not actually legally binding. Also, I am happy that even the human rights treaties that our Godly country signed are more of guidelines than actual law - just ask the prisoners in Guantanamo about their "human rights."

This is the best thing about this great country of ours - we can choose and pick to whom we do apply human rights laws and to whom we don't.

Re: The Immorality of the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights"
 

Brother, as True Christian™ Republicans we are doing precisely what we should in this regard.

The greatest contribution that a man can make to society is to clench his anal sphincter as tight as possible at all times, so that the airborne AIDS germs that Obama's H.A.A.R.P. emanates constantly throughout the ionosphere cannot infest our delicate colons. :innocent:

Secondly, we vote Republican. This is all that is in our power insofar as setting up a True Christian™ theocracy in America and around the globe. Once our Christian social policies and free market economic policies are completely enacted, all witches, queers, disobedient children, and adulterers (including those who commit adultery by having lust in their hearts) will be stoned to death, all serial rapists will be married to a harem of their own victims, at cost, and will be given license to rape their wives whenever it pleases them, like all husbands, the sons of Ham will go back to picking cotton and orally servicing their white masters, and basically the only people left alive will be those that Christ calls up to Heaven in the Rapture.

Brother, as Christians, we are doing everything we can. :innocent:

Re: The Immorality of the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights"
 

I don't trust free thinkers and their supporters. Free thinkers are evil. They approve abortion, homosexuality, masculine women, feminine men, smokers, drunkers, suicide, people who wear tattos, percings and so on.

I do miss the old days where women stay at home, men makes more money and lieberals calls us sexist pricks when we are not.

Re: The Immorality of the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights"
 

There will be many, many atheists and catlix who read Pastor Zeke's words to whom we will henceforth apply:

Ac:9:18: And immediately there fell from his eyes as it had been scales: and he received sight forthwith, and arose, and was baptized.

Surely there will be nobody who does not now see how the road to :hell-2: is paved with good intentions.

Re: The Immorality of the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights"
 

Whoaaaa!!! Stop the bus right there missy, or is it really mister?

I think we may have a female impersonator in our midst.

Re: The Immorality of the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights"
 

You inhuman scum why id spit on you if you were not men heck I'm not even sure if you are. We are all human and we all matter regardless of ethnicity, religious creed sex, sexuality, and morals. Rot in hell you worthless price of garbage may your soul burn in sulfur and may you suffer every punishment known to God and satan.

Re: The Immorality of the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights"
 

Rather than try and come up with a reasonable response to a perfectly decent sermon, you instead simply go straight for the character assassination technique. Typical atheist move.

Re: The Immorality of the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights"
 

Dear Godmocking Maggot;

Thank you for taking the time out of your busy schedule of worshiping satan and spreading your legs for anyone with a dollar to post this hateful message. The Holy Bible tells us that we are actually Blessed by your persecution! Thanks for proving that we're right. :tiphat:

Enjoy hell. I know that Jesus and I can't wait to watch you burn in hell for all eternity. Oh, how we'll laugh at you as you scream in agony! Shout Glory!! :yahoo:

YIC,

--Pastor Ezekiel

Re: The Immorality of the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights"
 

Wow.

Just wow.

I guess this would be an example of classic Christian tolerance on your part, huh?

Re: The Immorality of the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights"
 

Really? What about the Japs in WWII? Are they the good guys now? Do you even read what you write?

What about atheist anal rapist? Do you think these people are equal to a Christian member of the USCMC? Our boys are dying out there in hostile environments fighting to keep YOU safe from those weird aliens in Umogumoland (or what ever it's called these days) and YOU think they are equal to perverts of some Chinaman with his finger on the red button?

Shame on you, young woman. People like you hate America and Jesus and you make me want to puke :blech: You are awful and a terrible person who makes me sick to my stomach.

All the best.

YIC

Re: The Immorality of the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights"
 

Excuse me ma'am but my religious tolerance only extends so far the minute you attack people based on their beliefs or skin color or whatever is the minute I lose it.

Re: The Immorality of the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights"
 

First and foremost you people can surly hold a grudge. Second isn't every human inclined to make mistakes, we're not perfect just human. Are not all humans sinful. Are we not all made of organs and cells and souls. All humans regardless of deeds still are humans.

Re: The Immorality of the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights"
 

Oh. Do you mean, then, that you are tolerant only towards those people who hold the same or at least similar views to your own?

FYI, that is not tolerance.

Re: The Immorality of the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights"
 

Sorry but don't see it could you point it out?

Re: The Immorality of the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights"
 

:facepalm:

Here:

Every religion attacks people based on their beliefs, and most religions attack people based on skin color.

Please educate yourself before you make judgments about religions.

Re: The Immorality of the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights"
 

:rofl3:

True Christians™ are Perfect!