The Landover Baptist Church Forum

The Landover Baptist Church Forum (https://www.landoverbaptist.net/forumindex.php)
-   Promise Enforcers - Men Only! (https://www.landoverbaptist.net/forumdisplay.php?f=24)
-   -   Satan's latest weapon: Post-Pubescent female breasts (https://www.landoverbaptist.net/showthread.php?t=6092)

Jeb Stuart Thurmond 12-13-2007 08:41 PM

Satan's latest weapon: Post-Pubescent female breasts
 
Lately the unsaved trash who invade our forum to persecute us have started using a new tactic: posting pornography, aka pron. While the most obvious examples are quickly deleted with a simple mouse-click, the forces of darkness have gotten clever enough to try infiltration tactics - sneaking the porn in, under the radar.

Since this is the men's only forum, I should be able to post examples without accidentally tramatizing anyone, but just in case....IF YOU ARE FEMALE OR UNDER THE AGE OF 30 LEAVE THIS THREAD NOW!

If not, scroll down..


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Okay, here is an example of infiltration porn:

http://www.china-manufacturer-direct...tue-sm-006.jpg

Now, It certainly looks to me like an underage male positioning himself for a sodomizing of his mother, but of course it is open to some interpretation. However, one thing we can all agree upon is that this image contains a "post-pubescent female breast".

Which is the definition of pornography under the soon-to-be-passed "Child Online Protection Act". (Go ahead and read the bill for yourself).

See SEC. 231, 6B "

Quote:

"Depicts, describes, or represents....post-pubescent female breast"
So, by depicting, describing, or representing post-pubescent female breasts on our forum, they can have us punished with this:

Quote:

shall be fined not more than $50,000, imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both. ``(2) Intentional violations.--In addition to the penalties under paragraph (1), whoever intentionally violates such paragraph shall be subject to a fine of not more than $50,000 for each violation. For purposes of this paragraph, each day of violation shall constitute a separate violation. ``(3) Civil penalty.--In addition to the penalties under paragraphs (1) and (2), whoever violates paragraph (1) shall be subject to a civil penalty of not more than $50,000 for each violation. For purposes of this paragraph, each day of violation shall constitute a separate violation.
So, that means that if a troll makes a post with something that Depicts, describes, or represents a post-pubescent female breast, then copies and pastes it ten times, and for some reason we only delete it after ten days, that's 100 violations.

With 100,000 dollars in fines and civil penalties, plus the 6 months in jail, that adds up to us having to spend ten million dollars and 50 years in jail.

Suddenly all these pictures of naked cherubs and boys with bulges in their shorts all makes sense, doesn't it?

Now, because the Child Online Protection Act is not in effect yet, these porn attacks have no effect on us. We just take half a second clicking the delete button and that's that. When the act goes into effect, we will hire 24-hour porn-catchers (The chinese are very cost-effective at this) and/or require a credit card number from people who wish to read the forum.

As for the question of what to do about statues and paintings that contain post-pubescent female breasts, we have already begun a program to file down and/or repaint the breasts in question to become pubescent female breasts. Venus Di Milo, by the way, has far more artistic merit as a 13-year old girl than as a post-pubescent woman.

So don't get me wrong: I am 100% in favor of the Child Online Protection Act. All these claims that we're invading privacy is nonsense, and the Bush administration will prove it once they've managed to sue Google into reveiling what you've all be entering into search engines:

Quote:

SAN JOSE, Calif. — The Bush administration, seeking to revive an online pornography law struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court, has subpoenaed Google Inc. for details on what its users have been looking for through its popular search engine.

Google has refused to comply with the subpoena, issued last year, for a broad range of material from its databases, including a request for 1 million random Web addresses and records of all Google searches from any one-week period, lawyers for the U.S. Justice Department said in papers filed Wednesday in federal court in San Jose.

…The government contends it needs the data to determine how often pornography shows up in online searches as part of an effort to revive an Internet child protection law that was struck down two years ago by the U.S. Supreme Court on free-speech grounds.

The 1998 Child Online Protection Act would have required adults to use access codes or other ways of registering before they could see objectionable material online, and it would have punished violators with fines up to $50,000 or jail time.
So why subpoena Google? The government will make its case by reading us a list of all the disgusting, licentious things that people typed into a Google window over the course of a week. Because that would prove that people look for dirty stuff on the web.

Thus the Republican Party will prove that any child could find him or herself looking at online filth just by innocently typing (for example) “pregnant shemale amputee midgets drowning in semen” into a Google window. It probably happens all the time, for school projects and whatnot, and just think about what that seemingly innocuous search could lead to!

I for one am happy to be alive at a time when the government wants to view information about our online habits, when they’re not even trying to prosecute a crime. They need to subpoena Google in order to prove that people use the Internet for porn, in order to shore up their case for re-passing that bill that the ultra-liberal Supreme Court absurdly called a violation of privacy.

This is going to work so well we won't even need to complete that legislation to to remove the letters E, S, and X from keyboards sold to minors.

lord warrior 12-13-2007 11:16 PM

Re: Satan's latest weapon: Post-Pubescent female breasts
 
And that porn is everywhere. I was looking for a bikini for my 13 year old wife, and found several sites that were just thousands of pictures of these 12 to 18 year old girls in bikini's. Some had other pictures of girls with nothing on. And now these trolls of the internet are invading here. Like a true christian male would go gaga over some little 13 year olds small succulent breasts. Do they know we are immune to such temptresses.

WilliamJenningsBryan 12-14-2007 05:30 AM

Re: Satan's latest weapon: Post-Pubescent female breasts
 
Brother Jeb does bring up some interesting dilemmas when it comes to protecting our young. I remember some years ago the Lezbeans got their boxer shorts (and kick start vibrators) all twisted because some software prohibited the word "breast" from searches (http://www.scu.edu/ethics/publicatio...cybersmut.html). They felt that it prevented young girls from getting information about breast cancer (ignoring the fact that only men can reliably perform such inspections).

More recently there arose a controversy amongst the LoL (Ladies of Landover) as to whether some alleged pre-pubescent female breasts had been artificially augmented to look like post-pubescent female breasts. Needless to say, the pictures had all been deleted before the Pastors had a chance to render a proper opinion in the matter (*).


(*)This has caused no small trouble on my part looking in to the SQL data bases and attempting to retrieve the ext3 inodes from the filing system. (Note to self: check with Brother Deaner - they may still be in his browser cache).

see_the_light 12-14-2007 12:38 PM

Re: Satan's latest weapon: Post-Pubescent female breasts
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lord warrior (Post 118371)
And that porn is everywhere. I was looking for a bikini for my 13 year old wife, and found several sites that were just thousands of pictures of these 12 to 18 year old girls in bikini's. Some had other pictures of girls with nothing on. And now these trolls of the internet are invading here. Like a true christian male would go gaga over some little 13 year olds small succulent breasts. Do they know we are immune to such temptresses.


Good day brother and PRAISE JESUS!

13 already? That marriage of yours is bright in my memory as if it was yesterday (by the way, beautiful sermon if I recall correctly) time flies.

PRAY TO JESUS!

p.s. you are getting kinky in your old age, it must be "for you", a bikini is a bit too unclad for any other moment of a TRUE CHRISTIAN WOMAN

GodGoodFlavor 12-14-2007 10:52 PM

Re: Satan's latest weapon: Post-Pubescent female breasts
 
( @ Y @ )
( @ Y @ )
( @ Y @ )
( @ Y @ )
( @ Y @ )
( @ Y @ )
( @ Y @ )
( @ Y @ )
( @ Y @ )
( @ Y @ )
( @ Y @ ) theres some boobs. go ahead and call the police you freaks.

Jeb Stuart Thurmond 12-18-2007 10:46 PM

Re: Satan's latest weapon: Post-Pubescent female breasts
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GodGoodFlavor (Post 118755)
( @ Y @ )
( @ Y @ )
( @ Y @ )
( @ Y @ )
( @ Y @ )
( @ Y @ )
( @ Y @ )
( @ Y @ )
( @ Y @ )
( @ Y @ )
( @ Y @ ) theres some boobs. go ahead and call the police you freaks.

Who has ten pairs of breasts? Do you have a millipede fetish or something? Anyway since those "nipples" are so puffy, we can assume that they are pubescent female breasts, not post-pubescent ones.

Thus your attempt at a porn attack has failed.

Shinigami_Raito 12-21-2007 10:34 AM

Re: Satan's latest weapon: Post-Pubescent female breasts
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lord warrior (Post 118371)
And that porn is everywhere. I was looking for a bikini for my 13 year old wife, and found several sites that were just thousands of pictures of these 12 to 18 year old girls in bikini's. Some had other pictures of girls with nothing on. And now these trolls of the internet are invading here. Like a true christian male would go gaga over some little 13 year olds small succulent breasts. Do they know we are immune to such temptresses.


I'm sorry..what?

13 yo..

wife..

??

I'm missing something here....


pics or it didn't happened

since she is 13 yo, she has no post-pubescent breasts, so accordingly to that guy over there, that wouldn't be considered porn, right?

if so, bring forth the 13 yo girl breasts!

Dwayode 01-03-2008 04:45 AM

Re: Satan's latest weapon: Post-Pubescent female breasts
 
c'mon, I love me some nice pair of hands clasped together in front my face praying to the Lord!

TheTruePath 01-03-2008 08:56 AM

Re: Satan's latest weapon: Post-Pubescent female breasts
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lord warrior (Post 118371)
And that porn is everywhere. I was looking for a bikini for my 13 year old wife, and found several sites that were just thousands of pictures of these 12 to 18 year old girls in bikini's. Some had other pictures of girls with nothing on. And now these trolls of the internet are invading here. Like a true christian male would go gaga over some little 13 year olds small succulent breasts. Do they know we are immune to such temptresses.

Wait you're wife is 13? Isn't that illegal?

Pastor Ezekiel 01-03-2008 11:43 AM

Re: Satan's latest weapon: Post-Pubescent female breasts
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Shinigami_Raito (Post 120663)
if so, bring forth the 13 yo girl breasts!

You want him to sell his wife into pornography? How repulsive is that? A man's wife is his to subjegate as he sees fit, not for perverts like you to ogle. :angry:

1 Timothy 2:11-15
Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. For Adam was first formed, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression. Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing.

1 Peter 3:1
Likewise, ye wives, be in subjection to your own husbands.


Quote:

Originally Posted by TheTruePath (Post 123836)
Wait you're wife is 13? Isn't that illegal?

Not in certain counties in certain states. Not that its any of your business either.

Why is it that all you perverts are so interested in Brother Warrior's new wife? :glare:

CaveManJoke 01-03-2008 01:20 PM

Re: Satan's latest weapon: Post-Pubescent female breasts
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pastor Ezekiel (Post 123873)
Not in certain counties in certain states. Not that its any of your business either.

Why is it that all you perverts are so interested in Brother Warrior's new wife? :glare:

Im not currently aware of any state that permits 13 year olds to marry, and I would imagine that any 13 is not aware of what she is going into, or is being forcefully married to the second party. Society has not deemed that acceptable for several hundred years. I guess no one around here has heard of pedophiles before.

Pastor Ezekiel 01-03-2008 01:24 PM

Re: Satan's latest weapon: Post-Pubescent female breasts
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by CaveManJoe (Post 123907)
Im not currently aware of any state that permits 13 year olds to marry, and I would imagine that any 13 is not aware of what she is going into, or is being forcefully married to the second party. Society has not deemed that acceptable for several hundred years. I guess no one around here has heard of pedophiles before.

Sir, we are NOT mary worshipers! You will find no pedophiles here. :thumbdown:

CaveManJoke 01-03-2008 01:24 PM

Re: Satan's latest weapon: Post-Pubescent female breasts
 
Several varieties of keyboard breast as well!

*Which have been edited because we don't need any more of your childish nonsense.

CaveManJoke 01-03-2008 01:27 PM

Re: Satan's latest weapon: Post-Pubescent female breasts
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pastor Ezekiel (Post 123912)
Sir, we are NOT mary worshipers! You will find no pedophiles here. :thumbdown:

Hm, what does the marriage to someone under the age of 18 qualify as?

By the way, I assume your in the US, I know it is damned early in the US at the moment, perhaps you spend too much time on your forum...

eliot mayfield 01-03-2008 01:31 PM

Re: Satan's latest weapon: Post-Pubescent female breasts
 
No, with parent's consent a girl can marry at 13 in many places.

Pastor Ezekiel 01-03-2008 01:35 PM

Re: Satan's latest weapon: Post-Pubescent female breasts
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by CaveManJoe (Post 123914)
Hm, what does the marriage to someone under the age of 18 qualify as?

It qualifies as normal, Godly marriage, as long as it is a Man and woman getting married. God is opposed to queer marriage, because they aren't normal.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaveInJoe (Post 123914)
By the way, I assume your in the US, I know it is damned early in the US at the moment, perhaps you spend too much time on your forum...

Thank you for your concern. I am quite busy with my pastoral duties during the day, so I often can only find time to attend to the flock here during these wee hours.

Perhaps you spend too much time steeped in sin? Perhaps you should read the Holy Bible and ask Jesus to enter your heart! :thumbsup:

I'll say a prayer for you right now.

CaveManJoke 01-03-2008 01:43 PM

Re: Satan's latest weapon: Post-Pubescent female breasts
 
Thanks for your concern, but I sadly am not on your happy continent at the moment, so I've just had a great nights sleep.

When I need entertainment I would rather read George Carlin or a Stephen King book.



So the girl technically can have no say in the marriage, fun. I imagine that is great for her. Would technically be rape if she was having sexual activites with the man because she is not willingly taking part in the activity, but her parents having decided for her.

Brother Temperance 01-03-2008 02:11 PM

Re: Satan's latest weapon: Post-Pubescent female breasts
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by CaveManJoe (Post 123907)
Society has not deemed that acceptable for several hundred years.

You claim to be a caveman, so why should that bother you?
Quote:

I guess no one around here has heard of pedophiles before.
We know all about pedophiles. If you want to talk about Moo-Ham-Head, go over to the False Religions and Cults forum.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pastor Ezekiel (Post 123920)
It qualifies as normal, Godly marriage, as long as it is a Man and woman getting married. God is opposed to queer marriage, because they aren't normal.

Or Mormon marriages, as practised by the blaspheming cultist Mitt Romany! :angry:
Quote:

Originally Posted by CaveManJoe (Post 123926)
So the girl technically can have no say in the marriage, fun. I imagine that is great for her. Would technically be rape if she was having sexual activites with the man because she is not willingly taking part in the activity, but her parents having decided for her.

Might I advise that you put down that filthy Mary Wollstonecraft or Sylvia Plath or whatever pornography you're flicking through and pick up a copy of the Holy Bible? Then come back and tell us what it says about "women's rights".

Abdul-Khaaliq 01-03-2008 03:40 PM

Re: Satan's latest weapon: Post-Pubescent female breasts
 
My youngest Wife is now 12 years old.
Girls where I come from start making young Martyrs for Allah (pigs be upon him) as soon as they are able.
You people are so backward.

Wide-Open 01-03-2008 03:46 PM

Re: Satan's latest weapon: Post-Pubescent female breasts
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Abdul-Khaaliq (Post 124006)
My youngest Wife is now 12 years old.
Girls where I come from start making young Martyrs for Allah (pigs be upon him) as soon as they are able.
You people are so backward.

So basically you are into the business of Sementex ? :ph34r:


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:33 AM.

Powered by Jesus - vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Landover Baptist Forums © 1620, 2022 all rights reserved