The Landover Baptist Church Forum

The Landover Baptist Church Forum (https://www.landoverbaptist.net/forumindex.php)
-   Teaching His Word (https://www.landoverbaptist.net/forumdisplay.php?f=9)
-   -   Scripture Proves Egyptology is an anti-Christian Fraud (https://www.landoverbaptist.net/showthread.php?t=117240)

Dennis Lukes 01-14-2020 12:12 AM

Scripture Proves Egyptology is an anti-Christian Fraud
 
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011...78_224x409.jpghttps://dfempscreening.files.wordpre...ake-degree.jpg


These days, the woods are full of biologists, physicists, geologists, chemists, anthropologists, meteorologists, historians, zoologists, psychiatrists, theologians, epidemiologists, cartographers, linguists, mathematicians, paleontologists, medical doctors, and other Godmocking sinners who have dedicated themselves body and soul to hating Jesus and undermining the truth of the King James Bible. Today, I want to expose another group of so-called “scholars” who reject the Bible: Egyptologists.

One of the most well-known “facts” about ancient Egypt is that their rulers held the title of “Pharaoh.” Wrong! This is directly contradicted by the Bible. The proper title of Egpyian rulers is “King of Egypt,” not “Pharaoh of Egypt.” Several Egyptian kings were named Pharaoh. If an entire field of scholars can make such a basic mistake as this, how can we trust anything they say? It’s like using the word “ain’t” in the first sentence of a PhD thesis.

This list of several of the Kings of Egypt mentioned in the Bible will demonstrate beyond the shadow of a doubt that Egyptologists are ignorant and incompetent fools:
  • King Pharaoh (1) - The first Egyptian king to appear in the Bible is Pharaoh in the Book of Genesis. This is the one who lusts after Sarah while she is pretending to be Abraham’s sister, and who later buys Joseph as a slave. He is mentioned numerous times as “Pharaoh,” not “the Pharaoh.” He identifies himself as “Pharaoh” (Genesis 41:44), and he is referred to as “Pharaoh king of Egypt” (Genesis 41:46).
  • King Pharaoh (2) - This next one is the famous Pharaoh from the Book of Exodus, who faces off with Moses and, as a result, is plagued by God and then drowned. Like the earlier King Pharaoh, he is repeatedly called “Pharaoh,” not “the Pharaoh.” You would call Queen Elizabeth “the Queen,” not “Queen,” because that is her title, not her name. He too is titled “king of Egypt” (Exodus 6:13, Deuteronomy 7:8). That there are multiple kings named Pharaoh is understandable enough; England had eight Kings Edward and there have been 23 Popes John. Egyptologists love calling him “Ramses II” even though this name does not appear in the Bible and his name is clearly given as “Pharaoh.”
  • King Pharaoh (3) - Another King Pharaoh from 1 Kings. He gives his daughter in marriage to King Solomon, and he is called “Pharaoh king of Egypt” (1 Kings 3:1, 1 Kings 9:24).
  • King Shishak - The first Egyptian king mentioned in the Bible who isn’t named “Pharaoh.” He is the successor of the previous king and goes to war with King Solomon and later with King Rehoboam. He is clearly referred to as “Shishak king of Egypt” (1 Kings 11:4, 1 Kings 14:25), not as the “Pharaoh.”
  • King So - Appears in 2 Kings 17:4. Name is So, title is king. Word “Pharaoh” does not appear.
  • King Pharaohnechoh - This Egyptian king appears in 2 Kings. Egyptologists are tempted to call him “Pharaoh Nechoh,” but this is a grievous sin (Deuteronomy 12:32). His name is one word, “Pharaohnechoh,” and he is the king of Egypt (2 Kings 23:29, Jeremiah 46:2).
  • King Pharaohhophra - Successor of King Pharaohnechoh, mentioned in Jeremiah 44:30. Same case as above.
And what about King Tut? He’s not in the Bible, but nobody calls him “Pharaoh Tut.”

There you have it. Solid Biblical exegesis that proves the ancient Egyptian monarchs were titled “Kings” not “Pharaohs,” and that the latter was actually a personal name, not a title. Thus Egyptology as a field of study is completely and utterly shattered and unmasked as the un-Biblical, anti-Christian fraud that it truly is


Brother Gonzalez 01-14-2020 01:04 AM

Re: Scripture Proves Egyptology is an anti-Christian Fraud
 
Luckily enough, Egyptology is like history and science, something people are forced to read on school but they do not pay attention and they forget whatever they have learnt after the semester is done.However, Hollywood take this Egyptology and uses it to make movies about nonsense like living dead and the likes, taking advantage of poor public education (Obama is to blame for this, of course, he destroyed public education in America)
"Sciences" like paleontology, geology, geography, astrology and egyptology should be banned to be taught in school for not adjusting to the reality of the Bible. Same with Hollywood movies. Trump will do it if he can win against the forces of the devil and Nancy Pelocy.
And yes, he can.

WilliamJenningsBryan 01-15-2020 01:20 AM

Re: Scripture Proves Egyptology is an anti-Christian Fraud
 
I always suspected that Zahi ("pee-RA-meeds") Hawass was a crackpot, but I'm not so sure about those Tana leaves. Remember when Bernie Sanders had his "heart attack" recently, and then a day later he was back campaigning? Someone forgot to bring the Tana leaves.

Basilissa 01-15-2020 03:31 PM

Re: Scripture Proves Egyptology is an anti-Christian Fraud
 
Egyptology really is just a branch of archaeology, and aside from True Christian™ Biblical Archaeology (which objective is to prove that the Bible is 100% accurate), archaeology is pure baloney. :thumbdown: Archaeologists claim existence of humans long before the creation of the world 6000 years ago, which automatically proves that archaeologists are dead wrong and on their way to :hell-2:.

I Man Rastafari 01-15-2020 03:56 PM

Re: Scripture Proves Egyptology is an anti-Christian Fraud
 
Greetings!

When I was a boy at the Methodist School in Tivoli Gardens which is located in Kingston Jamaica which is my home if we discount Africa which is my true home though I do not live there just now I used to have an after school job painting ancient Egyptian artifacts which were then sent to Egypt to sell to white tourists. Some of the artifacts I was painting were said to be many thousands of years old but I knew all along that they were really not as old as the Chinese man who owned the shop said because Jah did not create the Earth until about 6,000 years ago according to his word. I have saved a few of these artifacts for my own enjoyment but I know that white people all want an ancient statue or bowl so I would consent to sell some of them due to a chronic shortage of funds if they are wanted by my white friends.

Jah Guide!
Trevor

Joanna Lytton-Vasey 01-15-2020 04:41 PM

Re: Scripture Proves Egyptology is an anti-Christian Fraud
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by I Man Rastafari (Post 1263265)
I have saved a few of these artifacts for my own enjoyment but I know that white people all want an ancient statue or bowl so I would consent to sell some of them due to a chronic shortage of funds if they are wanted by my white friends.

Trevor, do you have anything like these cheerful-looking mummified cats?


http://www.strangehistory.net/blog/w...ptian-cats.jpg


I wouldn't give them house-room, but they sell well at Church fundraisers to the sort of people who like that sort of thing. Most of the originals that were shipped over to Britain were ground up and used for fertilizer.

Basilissa 01-15-2020 05:48 PM

Re: Scripture Proves Egyptology is an anti-Christian Fraud
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Joanna Lytton-Vasey (Post 1263273)
Trevor, do you have anything like these cheerful-looking mummified cats?

I wouldn't give them house-room, but they sell well at Church fundraisers to the sort of people who like that sort of thing. Most of the originals that were shipped over to Britain were ground up and used for fertilizer.

That is a very good use of them, as most of them are forgeries - ancient forgeries:

Quote:

It’s a scandal thousands of years in the making: Recently, scientists at the Manchester Museum and University of Manchester discovered that a third of the museum’s collection of Ancient Egyptian animal mummies were empty...
After analyzing over 800 mummies of all shapes and sizes, the team was stunned to discover that only a third contained intact remains. Another third of the animal mummy collection was stuffed with partial remains and the last third had no animal parts whatsoever...
Mummy makers would have had a hard time keeping up with demand, and turned to other materials to fill out their quotas.
:link:

Mary Etheldreda 01-15-2020 06:15 PM

Re: Scripture Proves Egyptology is an anti-Christian Fraud
 
Cats are vile and dangerous creatures, and now even secular science can no longer deny the reason why Egyptians hailed them as gods and Puritans knew them as Witches' Familiars: They channel the Devil Himself and invite Demons into one's home.

Christianity Today explains a recent study that shows regular church-goers are far less likely to own cats as pets than Hell-bound atheists who are not only lonely, but bitterly so:
Quote:

Perry said that the findings could be down to personality, but that it could also suggest that atheists use pets to replace the human interaction they would otherwise have if they were part of a religious community.


Dennis Lukes 01-16-2020 03:39 AM

Re: Scripture Proves Egyptology is an anti-Christian Fraud
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mary Etheldreda (Post 1263278)
Hell-bound atheists who are not only lonely, but bitterly so

I often find myself feeling almost sorry for the atheists, but then I remember that they brought their misery upon themselves (Psalm 53:1) and God hates them for it just as much as he hates the Egyptians who mocked Him by worshipping demons and creating mummies.

Basilissa 01-16-2020 04:03 PM

Re: Scripture Proves Egyptology is an anti-Christian Fraud
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dennis Lukes (Post 1263287)
God hates them for it just as much as he hates the Egyptians who mocked Him by worshipping demons and creating mummies.

Well, at least ancient Egyptian mummies can be used for something - which cannot really be said about atheists. :thumbdown:

Here are some of the practical uses of ancient mummies (human and animal):

1. Fertilizer (as noted by Sister Joanna).
Quote:

...mud-bricked houses, for example, are to this day mined as nitrogen fertiliser. The cats eventually enjoyed a similar fate both at home and, interestingly, abroad. ‘Some were quickly sold to local farmers, and the bigger lots found their way to an Alexandrian merchant – then by the steamers Pharos and Thebes to Liverpool.’ At Liverpool in the UK they were sold at auction for £3, 13 s. 9d a ton and ground up and spread over English fields: the auctioneer, in a questionable attempt at humour, used a Beni-Hasan cat skull as his auction hammer. A second auction was even more successful.
2. Paint (so called Mummy Brown).
Quote:

If the paintings of the Pre-Raphaelite brotherhood look otherworldly, that’s because in some ways they are. The brown paint the artists used was called Mummy Brown, because it was actually made out of ground up Egyptian mummies.
Here is an example of a painting painted with ground up Egyptian mummies:


3. Fake relics of Catholic "saints."
Quote:

Bones thought to be the holy remains of 15th Century French heroine Joan of Arc were in fact made from an Egyptian mummy and a cat, research has revealed.

4. Medicine (sold as Mumia vera powder).
Quote:

Sabine Bernschneider-Reif, head of Corporate History at Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, remembers finding a glass box encased in wood on one of her first days on the job in Darmstadt in 1999. “Crammed into the box were two heads, a bandaged of feet, and a single uncovered foot,” she recalls. She was not shocked by this discovery. Thanks to her degree in pharmacology and Ph.D. in the history of pharmacology, she was familiar with its label, Mumia vera aegyptiaca. “Mummy parts from Egypt were used as medicine until the early 20th century,” she explains. As late as 1924, a kilogram of mummy powder cost 12 gold marks, according to the price list of Firma E. Merck Darmstadt, Germany.


Among other contestants for use of Egyptian mummies is production of paper and use as fuel in steam engine trains, but those remain unproven.

Pim Pendergast 01-17-2020 01:27 PM

Re: Scripture Proves Egyptology is an anti-Christian Fraud
 
1 Attachment(s)
Secular historians claim Egyptian chronology disproves the Bible. They seem to think we should blindly believe a collection of pseudo-historical books written in the Middle East thousands of years ago despite the following glaring omissions:
  1. Joseph saving the Egyptians from starvation
  2. The enslavement of the Israelites
  3. The Ten Plagues, including the death of Pharaoh's eldest son
  4. The Exodus

Egyptian chroniclers also neglected to mention the Great Flood. Apparently Egyptian civilisation somehow carried on as if it never even happened! The people at Answers in Genesis have a helpful table showing the discrepancies between Egyptian chronology and Biblical chronology.

Attachment 28620

Egyptologists even claim the pyramids were built before – and survived – the Flood. But, as AiG reminds us, "The pyramids do not come with labels declaring their dates." Like evolutionism, Egyptologism crumbles when exposed to the light of God's word.


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:15 PM.

Powered by Jesus - vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Landover Baptist Forums © 1620, 2022 all rights reserved