Re: Roman Catholic sex scandal of the day
 

Amen, dear Sister Mary. Amen!! I think that that Pell pervert thinks he can hide his sins behind his fancy robes, but he won't be fooling anybody other than himself when he stands before the :lord-fancy: :jesus-fancy: in the halls of Judgment!

Matthew 12:36 "But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment."

A blessed day to you, dear Sister Mary,
Sincerely, Isabella W.
https://www.thesaturdaypaper.com.au/...?itok=VdmJrtdF

Re: Roman Catholic sex scandal of the day
 

And in today's news ... yet another mention of more nonsense from the Cathyolick Church! This time, it's about the Vatican and how it funded money toward a film production about that perverted Elton John person, with regard to a movie based on his life.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/va...ohns-rocketman

"ROME, December 6, 2019 — The biographical musical film based on the life of Sir Elton John, the first movie by a major film studio to include a male homosexual sex scene, was partly financed by the Vatican, Italian media are reporting. According to Corriere della Sera, recent inquiries into Vatican finances have revealed that at last €1 million in the Catholic faithful’s offerings to Peter’s Pence, a Vatican fund used “for the many different needs of the Universal Church and for the relief of those most in need,” was invested in “Rocketman,” with an additional €3 million going to the most recent “Men in Black.”

Certainly, this comes as no surprise to the :true-fancy: believers here at :forum-fancy:. Considering the many scandals involving the Cathyolick priests and their sinful acts of raping so many altar boys over the years, I suppose this donation of money to a sinful :hell-4:ywood film is just another business transaction. At least, the transfer of money does not involve a pay-out to victims of abuse -- for once!

A blessed day to all,
Sincerely, Isabella W.


https://external-content.duckduckgo....jpg&f=1&nofb=1

Re: Roman Catholic sex scandal of the day
 

I have just one question, Sister: is this the photo of the bishop who financed the movie? :fear2:

Re: Roman Catholic sex scandal of the day
 

Oh, dear Sister Basilissa, I do think you are onto something there. It is probably a "Cardinal", on his way to a costume party. They do have closets full of such outfits, as you may well know.

A blessed day to you, Dear,
Sincerely, Isabella W.
https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-7C36VW_mK...dinal+hat.jpeg

Re: Roman Catholic sex scandal of the day
 

They certainly do have full closets, Sister! :giggle:
:hmmm: But the second photo - I believe this is not a Catholic Cardinal, but the queen of England?

Re: Roman Catholic sex scandal of the day
 

Oh, my, I think you are correct here, dear Sister Basilissa. I guess I'm just so used to seeing the Queen wearing a crown that I didn't quite recognize her in that photo. One thing is for sure, though: one old queen is pretty much the same as the next, wouldn't you agree?

A blessed evening to you, Dear,
Sincerely, Isabella W.
https://external-content.duckduckgo....jpg&f=1&nofb=1

Re: Roman Catholic sex scandal of the day
 

The Papist Cult in Buffalo, NY would rather claim bankruptcy than offer the reparations asked for by their parishioners whom they repeatedly abused and humiliated. 260 cases against the global institution that functions to give pedophiles safe harbor seems to have woken up the cult. The diocese already paid $17.5 million to 106 victims in 2018 under a voluntary compensation program. The priests shelled out as little as $2000 for some buggery, and $650,000 for others. :ph34r:

Re: Roman Catholic sex scandal of the day
 

Surely the Vatican has enough money to shell out an average of $165,000 for every man, woman and child in Buffalo? The total would amount to about six months' of cleaning charges for wiping unmentionable stuff off the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel.

Re: Roman Catholic sex scandal of the day
 

Ousted Cardinal McCarrick ran sex ring at N.J. beach house

Re: Roman Catholic sex scandal of the day
 

Why would a Catholic cardinal run a sex ring out of a beach house? Was the church building closed for renovation?

Re: Roman Catholic sex scandal of the day
 

Seminarian is such a poor choice of word here, don't you think? Semenarium might have been more appropriate.

Re: Roman Catholic sex scandal of the day
 

I never understood those Mary-Worshippers. Why do they support these men who rape innocent boys?

Either way, they're all going to Hell.

Re: Roman Catholic sex scandal of the day
 

Sitting on billions, the Catholic Church amassed tax payer aid. There is no going too low for this greedy, slimy, club of pedophiles when it comes to Jewing the people out of their hard-earned money. Even during a pandemic when funds are desperately low, the bishops hoard more for themselves.

Re: Roman Catholic sex scandal of the day
 

I wonder if Mr. Rovagnati has something to say about this.

Is it truly selfish to molest dogs over kids?

Re: Roman Catholic sex scandal of the day
 

I think they should keep far away from both. I like all the animals around me but I would not sacrifice the altar boys instead.

Re: Roman Catholic sex scandal of the day
 

Well, it appears that there will be the usual attempts by the Cathyolick priests to cover up the truth — such as by disguising the new victims!

https://cdn.studentmoneysaver.co.uk/...15.05_.44_.png

Re: Roman Catholic sex scandal of the day
 

Re: Roman Catholic sex scandal of the day
 

It's not the priest's fault if he ends up getting seduced by kids (or even dogs). The entire clergy tries the best to avoid that.

Re: Roman Catholic sex scandal of the day
 

it does not stop:

https://twitter.com/Newsweek/status/1559942379506917378


Yic ,


Phil

Re: Roman Catholic sex scandal of the day
 

Gobbledygook follows:


In a number of cases where so-called Church Assets were discussed and reported on, it transpired that nobody actually "owned" anything, other than individual private citizens who comprise the dioceses. Church buildings have some weird category of title and there's a labyrinthine connection developed over many centuries whereby bizarre entities in Vatican City i.e. the state not the church, have access to resources unless that would create liability in which case it's the church not the state. Funds flowing from a diocese to third parties essentially come out of the collection plate, the word "diocese" signifying the congregation rather than any real assets.

The linked piece addresses this to some extent but any explanations I've ever heard just become more ridiculous the longer you listen. Vatican archives probably cover this in more detail but whatever details you've sought will not be found in whatever document you're reading because you'll have ferreted out the wrong document. I'm putting that at 100% and it's nice to have certainty because no explanation vomited forth so far has ever addressed the question being asked.