Should fetuses below the age of 6 weeks be allowed to marry?
Now the Supreme Court has finally recognized the rights of fetuses less than 6 weeks old, it's time to reevaluate all their legal rights. For so many years marriage has been assaulted with man-man, man-trans, trans-trans, man-dog, dog-trans, trans-dog-pig, man-bear-pig and other disgusting combinations. It has degraded the very meaning of marriage.
To restore its holy sanctity, it's time to ban weird perversions and only allow normal humans to get married. Including the previously disenfranchised 0-6 week age group. I'm sure there are plenty of Christian men who are lonely tonight who would sign up for one of these baby-wives. Men have rights too. |
Re: Should fetuses below the age of 6 weeks be allowed to marry?
Quote:
|
Re: Should fetuses below the age of 6 weeks be allowed to marry?
Quote:
Quote:
Solution: Prayer! Matthew 21:22 And all things, whatsoever ye shall ask in prayer, believing, ye shall receive. We'll just ask Jesus to reveal the sex of the embryo and then we can proceed with the nuptials. :thumbsup: Yours in Christ, Elmer :bye: |
Re: Should fetuses below the age of 6 weeks be allowed to marry?
Thank you, Dr. White, for explaining why it is difficult to know gender early in the personhood life. As you say, it would be helpful if God gave us some sign of the gender from day one.
Yet, gender does not prevent ownership of assets or wealth. If, for example, I were to father a child and wanted him/her to be financially comfortable (what parent does not want this for his child), I would be searching about for an appropriate mate. Bill Gates' child of, say, four weeks would be a great match. I would make certain, however, Gates actually willed some of his billions to that child. As soon as that ownership was documented the courtship and gender issues could be sorted out. |
Re: Should fetuses below the age of 6 weeks be allowed to marry?
I believe there are problems creating trusts or bequeathing assets to people who have not been born yet. Similarly for financial instruments (such as a promissory notes) which need to be made out to extant persons. Could this be an area meriting attention?
Whether retroactive paper could be established somehow for one's own benefit is an interesting point. Some of these things go stale after a while, some do not. Assets for the use generations not yet born is one area addressed by Nehemiah – including which spouses of those unborn should be excluded. This is perhaps where to look for guidance on the topic. NEHEMIAH 10 click internal link for chapter-by-chapter reading |
Re: Should fetuses below the age of 6 weeks be allowed to marry?
Quote:
So far so good, but what is the situation if the fetus was a female. Who owns the 11 year old then? Phil |
Re: Should fetuses below the age of 6 weeks be allowed to marry?
Quote:
I've wondered about a wealthy man who wills everything he owns to his "firstborn." He has both a girlfriend and a wife. Let's say he has sex with the girlfriend on the tenth of the month. Two nights later, on the 12th, he has sex with his wife. Then, the wife gives birth before the girlfriend. Obviously, the girlfriend's child should get all the inheritance. The girlfriend's child became a human the night of intimacy. The wife's child might abandon Biblical rules and claim to be born first. We are coming to a time when couples will need to keep a long on their private business. |
Re: Should fetuses below the age of 6 weeks be allowed to marry?
Quote:
I think this sort of dilemma only shows the importance of maintaining accurate and up-to-date family records. |
Re: Should fetuses below the age of 6 weeks be allowed to marry?
Quote:
Hebrews 7:10 For he was yet in the loins of his father, when Melchisedec met him. Quote:
Ruth 2:1, 22-23; 3:1-4 And Naomi had a kinsman of her husband's, a mighty man of wealth, of the family of Elimelech; and his name was Boaz . . . And Naomi said unto Ruth her daughter in law, It is good, my daughter, that thou go out with his maidens, that they meet thee not in any other field. So she kept fast by the maidens of Boaz to glean unto the end of barley harvest and of wheat harvest; and dwelt with her mother in law . . . Then Naomi her mother in law said unto her, My daughter, shall I not seek rest for thee, that it may be well with thee? And now is not Boaz of our kindred, with whose maidens thou wast? Behold, he winnoweth barley to night in the threshingfloor. Wash thyself therefore, and anoint thee, and put thy raiment upon thee, and get thee down to the floor: but make not thyself known unto the man, until he shall have done eating and drinking. And it shall be, when he lieth down, that thou shalt mark the place where he shall lie, and thou shalt go in, and uncover his feet, and lay thee down; and he will tell thee what thou shalt do. |
Re: Should fetuses below the age of 6 weeks be allowed to marry?
I am hoping that this female is a godly True Christian™ who understands the stakes in this matter and not some Liebral loser trying to scam our innocent, hardworking traffic courts.
Pregnant woman claims that her fetus counts as a person when driving in designated two person highway lane. |
Re: Should fetuses below the age of 6 weeks be allowed to marry?
Quote:
But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons. Hebrews 12:8 |
Re: Should fetuses below the age of 6 weeks be allowed to marry?
Now that we've established that the fetus is an actual human being from conception, we need to re-think s*xual intercourse during pregnancy.
|
Re: Should fetuses below the age of 6 weeks be allowed to marry?
Quote:
|
Re: Should fetuses below the age of 6 weeks be allowed to marry?
Quote:
|
Re: Should fetuses below the age of 6 weeks be allowed to marry?
Quote:
So which male baby carries on the line of property succession (or royal titles for that matter). Is it the first fertilized, or the first birth canal exit? God is the only one who knows which is the first fertilized. Maybe He will strike down the pretender before he can exert property rights. Then there is the case of monozygotic male twins. In fairness there should be a 50/50 ownership of the girl, but the secular authorities will probably go 100% to the first one out the birth canal. Phil |
Re: Should fetuses below the age of 6 weeks be allowed to marry?
1 Attachment(s)
Back when my wife, Mrs. Hutchins was around, she had a midwife woman that inspected my wife for 'female issues'. When the midwife decided my wife was going to have a female, I immediately put the child on the list on the Church Bulletin board 'Girls looking for Husband'. No need to put off to tomorrow what you can do today. Since I did not have a photograph, I used the following (with a disclaimer that she may appear different.
|
Re: Should fetuses below the age of 6 weeks be allowed to marry?
Of course fetuses should be able to marry, provided, of course, that their fathers have properly arranged the marriage and that the agreed dowry has been paid. But we should not permit the consummation of the marriage until they are 8 to 10 years old. After all, we don't want to sexualize children!
|
Re: Should fetuses below the age of 6 weeks be allowed to marry?
Quote:
|
Re: Should fetuses below the age of 6 weeks be allowed to marry?
That ten year old pregnant child is exactly why God gave us Deuteronomy 22.
The fellow who fathered her child should have paid the proper price to the little girl's dad and then married her with no possibility of divorce. That's the Biblical way of handling things; not abortion. |
Re: Should fetuses below the age of 6 weeks be allowed to marry?
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:53 AM. |
Powered by Jesus - vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Landover Baptist Forums © 1620, 2022 all rights reserved